Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah let's bitch about 2% and ignore the other 98%, You extremist piss me off.
Coal, oil and other pollution causing fossil fuels also kill and cause illness in millions of humans. As a former right winger I care more about humans and value them. Wind, solar, hydro and nuclear are the future if we wish to limit this.
Whine about a few dead birds as our cities kill nearly a billion a year. Senseless. The price of civilization comes with billions of dead animals. Our job is to limit that and wind, solar, hydro and nuclear are the key of doing just that.
Rectify and justify, you "former right winger". You're a fucking joke, you choke.
Modern day humanity would not exist without hydrocarbons.
Take a fucking hike, you poser.
Yeah let's bitch about 2% and ignore the other 98%, You extremist piss me off.
Coal, oil and other pollution causing fossil fuels also kill and cause illness in millions of humans. As a former right winger I care more about humans and value them. Wind, solar, hydro and nuclear are the future if we wish to limit this.
Whine about a few dead birds as our cities kill nearly a billion a year. Senseless. The price of civilization comes with billions of dead animals. Our job is to limit that and wind, solar, hydro and nuclear are the key of doing just that.
Rectify and justify, you "former right winger". You're a fucking joke, you choke.
Modern day humanity would not exist without hydrocarbons.
Take a fucking hike, you poser.
Just out of curiosity, Mr. Idiot, have you ever managed to post anything at all that isn't utterly retarded and completely pointless? 'Cause, you know, I've certainly never seen it. And BTW, when it comes to flaming, you really, really suck!
Rectify and justify, you "former right winger". You're a fucking joke, you choke.
Modern day humanity would not exist without hydrocarbons.
Take a fucking hike, you poser.
Just out of curiosity, Mr. Idiot, have you ever managed to post anything at all that isn't utterly retarded and completely pointless? 'Cause, you know, I've certainly never seen it. And BTW, when it comes to flaming, you really, really suck!
That's MISTER Mr. Idiot to you, bub.
Just out of curiosity, Mr. Idiot, have you ever managed to post anything at all that isn't utterly retarded and completely pointless? 'Cause, you know, I've certainly never seen it. And BTW, when it comes to flaming, you really, really suck!
That's MISTER Mr. Idiot to you, bub.
Please try to remove your head from your ass before communicating with me again, Mr. Idiot. I can't make out anything intelligible from your mumbles when you have it rammed so far up your lower intestine like that.
That's MISTER Mr. Idiot to you, bub.
Please try to remove your head from your ass before communicating with me again, Mr. Idiot. I can't make out anything intelligible from your mumbles when you have it rammed so far up your lower intestine like that.
Are you auditioning to be an MSNBC host, or do you just enjoy being a wimpy, death-panel-endorsing wacko?
Here's a clue....
TrollingBlunder is not here because he cares..
Not concerned about ALL birds.. I'm concerned about owls, hawks, eagles and bats.
Not concerned about ALL birds.. I'm concerned about owls, hawks, eagles and bats.
You are very obviously not concerned about anything but the continuation of the fossil fuel industry's profits from selling the stuff that is responsible for changing the Earth's climate patterns in ways that will eventually pose a grave threat to all life on this planet, including all of the birds.
You're just parroting the absurd propaganda being pushed by the fossil fuel polluters in their attempts to attack their clean energy competition in the suddenly changing energy marketplace. You're either their paid agent of disinformation or you are their "useful idiot" dupe.
LOLOLOL....riiiiight....everybody who is informing you about facts that contradict your denier cult myths and misinformation should just shut up. Typical Flat Earther response, fecalhead.STFU Princess.Not concerned about ALL birds.. I'm concerned about owls, hawks, eagles and bats.
You are very obviously not concerned about anything but the continuation of the fossil fuel industry's profits from selling the stuff that is responsible for changing the Earth's climate patterns in ways that will eventually pose a grave threat to all life on this planet, including all of the birds.
You're just parroting the absurd propaganda being pushed by the fossil fuel polluters in their attempts to attack their clean energy competition in the suddenly changing energy marketplace. You're either their paid agent of disinformation or you are their "useful idiot" dupe.
Your crackpot delusions should be embarrassing you but you're unfortunately way too retarded and misinformed to even realize how crazy you are, you poor victim of the Dunning-Kruger Effect.That's why the Audubon Society agrees with ME.. Because THEY are in the claws of fossil fuel producers. You're embarrassing yourself here..
LOLOLOL....riiiiight....everybody who is informing you about facts that contradict your denier cult myths and misinformation should just shut up. Typical Flat Earther response, fecalhead.STFU Princess.You are very obviously not concerned about anything but the continuation of the fossil fuel industry's profits from selling the stuff that is responsible for changing the Earth's climate patterns in ways that will eventually pose a grave threat to all life on this planet, including all of the birds.
You're just parroting the absurd propaganda being pushed by the fossil fuel polluters in their attempts to attack their clean energy competition in the suddenly changing energy marketplace. You're either their paid agent of disinformation or you are their "useful idiot" dupe.
Your crackpot delusions should be embarrassing you but you're unfortunately way too retarded and misinformed to even realize how crazy you are, you poor victim of the Dunning-Kruger Effect.That's why the Audubon Society agrees with ME.. Because THEY are in the claws of fossil fuel producers. You're embarrassing yourself here..
BTW, fecalhead, in what way exactly does your feeble little brain imagine that the Audubon Society agrees with your demented nonsense?
Audubon's Position on Wind Power
Summary
Audubon strongly supports properly sited wind power as a renewable energy source that helps reduce the threat posed to birds and people by climate change. However, we also advocate that wind power facilities should be planned, sited, and operated in ways that minimize harm to birds and other wildlife, and we advocate that wildlife agencies should ensure strong enforcement of the laws that protect birds and other wildlife.
Why Does Audubon Support Properly Sited Wind Power?
Top scientific experts from around the world, including Audubon's own scientists, agree that the effects of climate change are here now and will get worse.[1] Scientists have found that climate change has already affected half of the world's species' breeding, distribution, abundance, and survival rates.[2] The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicts that by mid-century, climate change may contribute to the extinction of 20-30 percent of all species on earth.
Scientists also agree that in order to help prevent species extinctions and other catastrophic effects of climate change, we must significantly reduce pollution from fossil fuels as quickly as possible. This will require rapidly expanding energy efficiency, renewable energy, and alternative fuels and making changes in land use, agriculture, and transportation.
Properly sited wind power is an important part of the strategy to combat climate change. Wind power is currently the most economically competitive form of renewable energy. As of October 2013, it provides more than 60,000 megawatts of power in the United States. With the current transmission infrastructure, the Department of Energy estimates that wind has the potential to generate 20 percent of the nation's energy.[3] Every megawatt-hour produced by wind energy avoids an average of 1,220 pounds of carbon dioxide emissions. If the United States obtains 20 percent of its electricity from wind power by 2020, it will reduce greenhouse gas emissions equivalent to taking 71 million cars off the road or planting 104 million acres of trees. Expanding wind power instead of fossil fuels also avoids the wildlife and human health impacts of oil and gas drilling, coal mining, and burning fossil fuels.
Audubon has testified in Congress about the effects of wind turbines on birds and bats. Audubon also supported and helped develop guidelines for the wind industry to help minimize harm to birds and other wildlife. Of course, in order for those guidelines to be effective, the government must enforce existing laws that protect birds and other wildlife. Audubon is a forceful advocate for enforcement of those protective laws, which is why as of December 2013, we are standing in strong opposition to a new U.S. Interior Department rule that will offer 30-year permits for wind farms to kill and injure Bald and Golden eagles.
LOLOLOL....riiiiight....everybody who is informing you about facts that contradict your denier cult myths and misinformation should just shut up. Typical Flat Earther response, fecalhead.STFU Princess.You are very obviously not concerned about anything but the continuation of the fossil fuel industry's profits from selling the stuff that is responsible for changing the Earth's climate patterns in ways that will eventually pose a grave threat to all life on this planet, including all of the birds.
You're just parroting the absurd propaganda being pushed by the fossil fuel polluters in their attempts to attack their clean energy competition in the suddenly changing energy marketplace. You're either their paid agent of disinformation or you are their "useful idiot" dupe.
Your crackpot delusions should be embarrassing you but you're unfortunately way too retarded and misinformed to even realize how crazy you are, you poor victim of the Dunning-Kruger Effect.That's why the Audubon Society agrees with ME.. Because THEY are in the claws of fossil fuel producers. You're embarrassing yourself here..
BTW, fecalhead, in what way exactly does your feeble little brain imagine that the Audubon Society agrees with your demented nonsense?
Audubon's Position on Wind Power
Summary
Audubon strongly supports properly sited wind power as a renewable energy source that helps reduce the threat posed to birds and people by climate change. However, we also advocate that wind power facilities should be planned, sited, and operated in ways that minimize harm to birds and other wildlife, and we advocate that wildlife agencies should ensure strong enforcement of the laws that protect birds and other wildlife.
Why Does Audubon Support Properly Sited Wind Power?
Top scientific experts from around the world, including Audubon's own scientists, agree that the effects of climate change are here now and will get worse.[1] Scientists have found that climate change has already affected half of the world's species' breeding, distribution, abundance, and survival rates.[2] The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicts that by mid-century, climate change may contribute to the extinction of 20-30 percent of all species on earth.
Scientists also agree that in order to help prevent species extinctions and other catastrophic effects of climate change, we must significantly reduce pollution from fossil fuels as quickly as possible. This will require rapidly expanding energy efficiency, renewable energy, and alternative fuels and making changes in land use, agriculture, and transportation.
Properly sited wind power is an important part of the strategy to combat climate change. Wind power is currently the most economically competitive form of renewable energy. As of October 2013, it provides more than 60,000 megawatts of power in the United States. With the current transmission infrastructure, the Department of Energy estimates that wind has the potential to generate 20 percent of the nation's energy.[3] Every megawatt-hour produced by wind energy avoids an average of 1,220 pounds of carbon dioxide emissions. If the United States obtains 20 percent of its electricity from wind power by 2020, it will reduce greenhouse gas emissions equivalent to taking 71 million cars off the road or planting 104 million acres of trees. Expanding wind power instead of fossil fuels also avoids the wildlife and human health impacts of oil and gas drilling, coal mining, and burning fossil fuels.
Bird group questions eagle rules - Standard Journal: News
I cant imagine many things more important than protecting a bird so widely regarded as one of this countrys most iconic species, said Dr. George Fenwick, president of the American Bird Conservancy.
Remarkably, this approach relies exclusively on the for-profit wind industry to self-report bird fatalities, even when such information may prove detrimental to the industrys bottom line. While some companies may play by the rules, others may not, making this system highly vulnerable to deception. I dont see how such a system will work to protect eagles, said Fenwick.
Eric Glitzenstein, with the public-interest law firm Meyer Glitzenstein & Crystal, which has worked with ABC on efforts to ensure that wind power projects are developed in a bird-friendly fashion, said the Interior Department "cut legal corners and disregarded public comments in crafting this rule, which is little more than a regulatory subsidy to the wind power industry. We will be reviewing all available legal options to ensure that eagles do not suffer needless death and maiming from this ill-advised and scientifically bankrupt weakening of eagle safeguards."
A 2004 study, prepared for the California Energy Commission, estimates that about 95 eagles were being killed annually in one area alonethe wind facilities at Altamont Pass in California. That estimate suggests that over the 30-year operation of those facilities, perhaps as many as 3,000 Golden Eagles may have been killed, with no prosecution by federal officials.
The 30-year permit action was originally proposed in April 2012 and provided for a 90-day comment period. ABC and the Conservation Law Center led a response effort and sent joint comments opposing the proposal to FWS in July 2012. The National Park Service opposed the proposed action, along with nearly 120 conservation, wildlife and animal protection groups including the Sierra Club, National Audubon Society, Defenders of Wildlife, National Resources Defense Council and The Nature Conservancy. Native American groups such as the Hopi Tribe, the Nez Perce Tribe, the Intertribal Council of Arizona and the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community have also expressed opposition to the change. In addition, thousands of concerned citizens responded to ABC action alerts on the proposal, writing to the U.S. Department of Interior asking that 30-year eagle take permits not be allowed.
Read more: Bird group questions eagle rules - Standard Journal: News
What's truly laughable is that when there is ANY negative impact from alternatives/renewables, it all suddenly becomes "acceptable".
And the same leftard goons that crow about the impact of hydrocarbons have absolutely nothing to offer regarding the impact of agriculture on the environment.
There is not one industrial process without some negative impact on environment or quality of life.
And when it comes to hydrocarbons, the positive impact on quality of life is suddenly ignored.
You're a hugely disgusting anti-science POS. If you ever had any 'buds', they'd also be working for the Koch brothers or Exxon.LOLOLOL....riiiiight....everybody who is informing you about facts that contradict your denier cult myths and misinformation should just shut up. Typical Flat Earther response, fecalhead.STFU Princess.
Your crackpot delusions should be embarrassing you but you're unfortunately way too retarded and misinformed to even realize how crazy you are, you poor victim of the Dunning-Kruger Effect.That's why the Audubon Society agrees with ME.. Because THEY are in the claws of fossil fuel producers. You're embarrassing yourself here..
BTW, fecalhead, in what way exactly does your feeble little brain imagine that the Audubon Society agrees with your demented nonsense?
Audubon's Position on Wind Power
Summary
Audubon strongly supports properly sited wind power as a renewable energy source that helps reduce the threat posed to birds and people by climate change. However, we also advocate that wind power facilities should be planned, sited, and operated in ways that minimize harm to birds and other wildlife, and we advocate that wildlife agencies should ensure strong enforcement of the laws that protect birds and other wildlife.
Why Does Audubon Support Properly Sited Wind Power?
Top scientific experts from around the world, including Audubon's own scientists, agree that the effects of climate change are here now and will get worse.[1] Scientists have found that climate change has already affected half of the world's species' breeding, distribution, abundance, and survival rates.[2] The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicts that by mid-century, climate change may contribute to the extinction of 20-30 percent of all species on earth.
Scientists also agree that in order to help prevent species extinctions and other catastrophic effects of climate change, we must significantly reduce pollution from fossil fuels as quickly as possible. This will require rapidly expanding energy efficiency, renewable energy, and alternative fuels and making changes in land use, agriculture, and transportation.
Properly sited wind power is an important part of the strategy to combat climate change. Wind power is currently the most economically competitive form of renewable energy. As of October 2013, it provides more than 60,000 megawatts of power in the United States. With the current transmission infrastructure, the Department of Energy estimates that wind has the potential to generate 20 percent of the nation's energy.[3] Every megawatt-hour produced by wind energy avoids an average of 1,220 pounds of carbon dioxide emissions. If the United States obtains 20 percent of its electricity from wind power by 2020, it will reduce greenhouse gas emissions equivalent to taking 71 million cars off the road or planting 104 million acres of trees. Expanding wind power instead of fossil fuels also avoids the wildlife and human health impacts of oil and gas drilling, coal mining, and burning fossil fuels.
You're a hugely dishonest SOB.. And all your buds are Eco-Frauds.
Your selective cut and pastes are EXTREMELY dishonest. In terms of your latest hatchet job -- you know FULL WELL that the "Audubon Society agrees with me" because you CENSORED this part of their statement.
Audubon has testified in Congress about the effects of wind turbines on birds and bats. Audubon also supported and helped develop guidelines for the wind industry to help minimize harm to birds and other wildlife. Of course, in order for those guidelines to be effective, the government must enforce existing laws that protect birds and other wildlife. Audubon is a forceful advocate for enforcement of those protective laws, which is why as of December 2013, we are standing in strong opposition to a new U.S. Interior Department rule that will offer 30-year permits for wind farms to kill and injure Bald and Golden eagles.
In essence you are lying to US and the Audubon Society is LYING to themselves with all that MEANINGLESS homage to wind power.. They WILL eventually learn their lesson.. The Audubon Society has taken it up the ass supporting a cause that has made them hypocrits and liars --- and they are pissed.
I'd tell you to 'stay stupid', fecalhead, but that advice would be totally unnecessary and superfluous. You'll never change. That's just how congenital retardation works.Stay crooked my friend....................
