Wisconsin heading for a recount, with other states to follow.

[Billy_Bob]

From what I've read, recounts generally don't change the results. The race has to be extremely close for a recount to change it; within 0.1%. That leads me to conclude that unless large scale voter fraud is found and proven, any recounts are probably just going to confirm the results.

Unless the software malware problem is resolved it will do nothing... IF the malware has been removed a scanning of documents and and audit check could make all the difference. over 6,000 votes in each county will add up...

 

[Dogbiscuit]

Here's the trend: in 2016 Rump squeezed out the Terrible Three (Wisc, Mich, Penna) by an all-three-combined total of under 80,000 votes. Biden has now racked up a margin of well over 200k and still counting in flipping those three. Clinton declined to challenge any of them, and they were a lot closer then than they are now.

Why did Clinton not challenge ?
How do we know that the Dems werent scared that fraud would be exposed as well if she were to challenge ?

The Bitch DID challenge. Remember the RECOUNTS by HAND? Jill Stein did NOT pay for those.

Alright then, I was thinking that another member said that Clinton did not challenge.
Thanks for clearing that up.

 

[Pogo]

Here's the trend: in 2016 Rump squeezed out the Terrible Three (Wisc, Mich, Penna) by an all-three-combined total of under 80,000 votes. Biden has now racked up a margin of well over 200k and still counting in flipping those three. Clinton declined to challenge any of them, and they were a lot closer then than they are now.

Why did Clinton not challenge ?
How do we know that the Dems werent scared that fraud would be exposed as well if she were to challenge ?

The Bitch DID challenge. Remember the RECOUNTS by HAND? Jill Stein did NOT pay for those.

Jill Stein challenged, not Clinton.

Prove me wrong.

 

[Dogbiscuit]

Here's the trend: in 2016 Rump squeezed out the Terrible Three (Wisc, Mich, Penna) by an all-three-combined total of under 80,000 votes. Biden has now racked up a margin of well over 200k and still counting in flipping those three. Clinton declined to challenge any of them, and they were a lot closer then than they are now.

Why did Clinton not challenge ?
How do we know that the Dems werent scared that fraud would be exposed as well if she were to challenge ?

How do we know the moon isn't made of green cheese?

A recount is literally that -- a recount. Like a cashier counts the drawer at the end of the day, and then recounts to be sure they have the right figure.

If "fraud" were going on it wouldn't be re-doing the same process already done, all over again, that would expose it. If "fraud" is exposed by counting... it would have been exposed the first time.

Sooooo........... that's how. Sadly for the self-delusionists, the word "fraud" does not mean "we lost".

How do we know the moon isn't made of green cheese?

Thats an excellent question and might be better served in a different forum.

Anyway you said,
Here's the trend: in 2016 Rump squeezed out the Terrible Three (Wisc, Mich, Penna) by an all-three-combined total of under 80,000 votes. Biden has now racked up a margin of well over 200k and still counting in flipping those three. Clinton declined to challenge any of them, and they were a lot closer then than they are now.

Did I misunderstand what you meant by "declined" ?

 

[San Souci]

Here's the trend: in 2016 Rump squeezed out the Terrible Three (Wisc, Mich, Penna) by an all-three-combined total of under 80,000 votes. Biden has now racked up a margin of well over 200k and still counting in flipping those three. Clinton declined to challenge any of them, and they were a lot closer then than they are now.

Why did Clinton not challenge ?
How do we know that the Dems werent scared that fraud would be exposed as well if she were to challenge ?

The Bitch DID challenge. Remember the RECOUNTS by HAND? Jill Stein did NOT pay for those.

Jill Stein challenged, not Clinton.

Prove me wrong.

PROVE? Where did a Green Party Candidate get 5 MILLION in two days? Don't be as stupid as most Democrats/

 

[Pogo]

Here's the trend: in 2016 Rump squeezed out the Terrible Three (Wisc, Mich, Penna) by an all-three-combined total of under 80,000 votes. Biden has now racked up a margin of well over 200k and still counting in flipping those three. Clinton declined to challenge any of them, and they were a lot closer then than they are now.

Why did Clinton not challenge ?
How do we know that the Dems werent scared that fraud would be exposed as well if she were to challenge ?

How do we know the moon isn't made of green cheese?

A recount is literally that -- a recount. Like a cashier counts the drawer at the end of the day, and then recounts to be sure they have the right figure.

If "fraud" were going on it wouldn't be re-doing the same process already done, all over again, that would expose it. If "fraud" is exposed by counting... it would have been exposed the first time.

Sooooo........... that's how. Sadly for the self-delusionists, the word "fraud" does not mean "we lost".

How do we know the moon isn't made of green cheese?

Thats an excellent question and might be better served in a different forum.

Anyway you said,
Here's the trend: in 2016 Rump squeezed out the Terrible Three (Wisc, Mich, Penna) by an all-three-combined total of under 80,000 votes. Biden has now racked up a margin of well over 200k and still counting in flipping those three. Clinton declined to challenge any of them, and they were a lot closer then than they are now.

Did I misunderstand what you meant by "declined" ?

Probably not. Apparently it was suggested that she petition for a recount, and she didn't do that. Ergo she declined that suggestion.

Generally if a state result is under an 0.5% margin a recount is either automatic or available at state expense on request. Jill Stein did petition for recounts; Clinton did not.

For those scoring at home (or even those by themselves at home), the margin in crucial Pennsylvania at last count is beyond that threshold. That means if Rump wants a recount he has to pay for it. And we all know how he is about paying for things. Right, El Paso?

 

[Oz and the Orchestra]

It would take a historic act of courage by the Supreme Court...to state that any ballot not recieved on election day in any state, does not count.....and that any ballot with obvious evidence of being a fake, is rejected...

That courage is not present at this time.

"It would take a historic act of courage by the Supreme Court...to state that any ballot not recieved on election day in any state, does not count."

Friggin hell apart from my replacing "courage" with "stupidity", you have unlike your orange blob master, decided to put your "big boy pants on" and say something logical for once.

Also, it must be at least half a dozen posts in a row that you haven't mentioned "guns".

There is hope for you yet of soon becoming a socialist!

Who'd have thought?

 

[LiberalsLIE]

 

[LiberalsLIE]

^Trump will win

 

[Claudette]

Recount isn't going to mean jack shit, if the fraudulent ballots aren't discovered and rejected and the "glitch" in the tallying software isn't remedied.

I'd bet the Trump people know that and will take steps to make sure everything is working correctly and the ballots are legal. I've heard Fed agents will be watching.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Too many witnesses are coming forward to claim fraud. Even to the extent that they committed the fraudulent act.

 

[LiberalsLIE]

 

[LiberalsLIE]

 

[LiberalsLIE]

 

[ColonelAngus]

PA, MI, WI, AND AZ should all be recounted.

If everything is legit, what are Dims afraid of?

 

[busybee01]

It's far from over. Media news outlets and drunk liberal mobs don't decide elections.

President Donald Trump’s campaign took steps to trigger a recount in Wisconsin on Saturday, coming days the president appeared to narrowly lose the state, leading several news outlets and Democratic nominee Joe Biden’s campaign to declare victory over the weekend.

The final results of the election have not been certified by state legislatures or the Electoral College.

According to The Associated Press and Decision Desk, an organization used by The Epoch Times, Biden has an approximately 21,000-vote lead over Trump in Wisconsin. Biden has 49.5 percent of the vote, while Trump has 48.9 percent.

Justin Clark, Trump’s deputy campaign manager, announced Saturday that his team would initiate a recount and said there were “irregularities” in the election process last Tuesday, while asserting the team is “very concerned about what we’re hearing and seeing.” He didn’t elaborate.

“There were some serious irregularities on election day that we are looking into. We’ve already announced that we’re going to seek a statewide recount in Wisconsin, and we plan to do so,” Clark said in a statement, as reported by the Washington Examiner.

Trump Campaign Moves to Initiate Wisconsin Recount

www.theepochtimes.com

Even Scott Walkser says that a recount eill not change the outcome.

 

[busybee01]

Recount isn't going to mean jack shit, if the fraudulent ballots aren't discovered and rejected and the "glitch" in the tallying software isn't remedied.

Yep..... if there is no way to tell the fake ballots from the real ballots then they will simply recount the fake ballots with the real ballots.......is there any way to know the difference? Cause otherwise it will prove futile, and all those idiots in the street cheering the election of that guy adolf who says he was going to make Germany great, are going to be very surprised in the years ahead....

Donald Trump is the modern day Adolph with you Nazis being the enablers.

 

[the other mike]

Donald Trump is the modern day Adolph with you Nazis being the enablers.

Calm down, Karen.

 

[Coyote]

It would take a historic act of courage by the Supreme Court...to state that any ballot not recieved on election day in any state, does not count.....and that any ballot with obvious evidence of being a fake, is rejected...

That courage is not present at this time.

Not courage. Corruption.

It's up to the states to determine their election laws.

 

[the other mike]

It would take a historic act of courage by the Supreme Court...to state that any ballot not recieved on election day in any state, does not count.....and that any ballot with obvious evidence of being a fake, is rejected...

That courage is not present at this time.

Not courage. Corruption.

It's up to the states to determine their election laws.

Ted Cruz Calls for Investigation of Voting Machine Software

www.theepochtimes.com