🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

With the 4th largest proven oil reserves what is Iran's need for "peaceful purposes" nuclear program

The Iran nuke deal was never about peaceful nuclear power. Anyone who makes that claim is either a liar, an idiot, or both.

Obozo wants his brother muslims in Iran to have nukes so they can destroy their common enemy Israel.

Some day you fools on the left will realize that obama is not who and what you think he is.

Obama doesn't want Republicans invading Iran. Simples.


But he wants Iran to destroy Israel. Got it.

You fools who think it was either this so-called deal or war are almost as stupid as the incompetent Kerry and Obama. This was not a deal, it was a surrender agreement.

Yes, I understand the rhetoric coming out of Iran.

However the US wanted to destroy the USSR and the USSR wanted to destroy the US. Did this mean that they actually threw nukes at each other?

Stupid? No. Actually people use their brains. Iran won't destroy Israel because they know what would come back at them. It's called MAD.

Saudi Arabia also wants to destroy Israel. The US lets them have loads of weapons.
 
Anyone who doesn't realize Iran will do what ever it takes to get a nuke is a fucking idiot.

Anyone who sees that Iran with nukes isn't going to get invaded by the US, will realise why Iran is so desperate.

I mean, look what happened to Iraq and Libya. Other OPEC countries who didn't like the US.

And then you realise why the right is so desperate to stop Iran getting nukes.
 
The Iran nuke deal was never about peaceful nuclear power. Anyone who makes that claim is either a liar, an idiot, or both.

Obozo wants his brother muslims in Iran to have nukes so they can destroy their common enemy Israel.

Some day you fools on the left will realize that obama is not who and what you think he is.

Obama doesn't want Republicans invading Iran. Simples.


But he wants Iran to destroy Israel. Got it.

You fools who think it was either this so-called deal or war are almost as stupid as the incompetent Kerry and Obama. This was not a deal, it was a surrender agreement.

Yes, I understand the rhetoric coming out of Iran.

However the US wanted to destroy the USSR and the USSR wanted to destroy the US. Did this mean that they actually threw nukes at each other?

Stupid? No. Actually people use their brains. Iran won't destroy Israel because they know what would come back at them. It's called MAD.

Saudi Arabia also wants to destroy Israel. The US lets them have loads of weapons.

I lived through the Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) and believe you me they didn't teach us to "duck and cover" based on guesses.
PLUS YOU are a f...king f...king LIAR.
Never in the history of the USA has there EVER BEEN a declared government policy to destroy another country! NEVER and much less
USSR! Where did you get your totally ignorant basic history of the USA???

Dumb s...ts like you fostering this anti-American rhetoric just as that dumb f...k president espousing the USA is the source of all ills!
half a million dead American soldiers are rolling over in their graves right now for your stupid ass-h...e comment "wanted to destroy USSR!

YOU and your comments ARE why we have dumb f...k terrorists wanting to destroy the USA!
They hear idiots like you espouse the USA wanted to destroy the USSR and they say "yup... goes right with what those politicians
were saying below and why we sending bomb-laden children to blow up US troops!"!!!
YOU don't even deserve to live in the USA with that kind of idiotic statement!

Remember John Kerry EARLIER wanted Bush to:
"Without a question, we need to disarm Saddam. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime .... to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real .... "Kerry , Jan . 23. 2003

Then he says this:
Senator Kerry (D) "American soldiers going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children."

U.S. Rep. John Murtha(D)"Our troops killed innocent civilians in cold blood,”
NOTE: Do you not believe the terrorists LOVED to hear our troops were cold blooded killers???

Durbin (D) "must have been done by Nazis, Soviets"--action of Americans in the treatment of their prisoners.

then Senator Obama said "troops are air-raiding villages and killing civilians,"

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid(D) "The war is lost, the surge is not accomplishing anything "

Don't you idiots get it??? Every time you faux-elite idiots make statements like "USA wanted destroy USSR" you are not only
spreading a f...king gigantic LIE but definitely performing a traitor's action by giving "aid and comfort to the enemy"!

MAD was what kept idiots like Nikita Khrushchev from expanding on his tantrum in the UN which I'm sure you've never heard about!

Nikita Khrushchev and the UN Shoe-Banging Incident
 
The Iran nuke deal was never about peaceful nuclear power. Anyone who makes that claim is either a liar, an idiot, or both.

Obozo wants his brother muslims in Iran to have nukes so they can destroy their common enemy Israel.

Some day you fools on the left will realize that obama is not who and what you think he is.

Obama doesn't want Republicans invading Iran. Simples.


But he wants Iran to destroy Israel. Got it.

You fools who think it was either this so-called deal or war are almost as stupid as the incompetent Kerry and Obama. This was not a deal, it was a surrender agreement.

Yes, I understand the rhetoric coming out of Iran.

However the US wanted to destroy the USSR and the USSR wanted to destroy the US. Did this mean that they actually threw nukes at each other?

Stupid? No. Actually people use their brains. Iran won't destroy Israel because they know what would come back at them. It's called MAD.

Saudi Arabia also wants to destroy Israel. The US lets them have loads of weapons.


what you are missing is that islamic radicals are not afraid of being blown to bits. thats how they get to meet muhammed and allah.

you are also totally wrong about saudi arabia. The saudis are more afraid of Iran and ISIS than they are of Israel. The Saudis do not want a nuclear Iran. But Obama does. Do you ever wondery why?
 
Anyone who doesn't realize Iran will do what ever it takes to get a nuke is a fucking idiot.

Anyone who sees that Iran with nukes isn't going to get invaded by the US, will realise why Iran is so desperate.

I mean, look what happened to Iraq and Libya. Other OPEC countries who didn't like the US.

And then you realise why the right is so desperate to stop Iran getting nukes.


Do you have any idea why the OPEC countries in the mid east do not like us? I can't wait to hear your answer.
 
WHY the f..k don't they use thorium instead of uranium?

What are the downsides of Thorium?
  • We don’t have as much experience with Th. The nuclear industry is quite conservative, and the biggest problem with Thorium is that we are lacking in operational experience with it. When money is at stake, it’s difficult to get people to change from the norm.
  • Thorium fuel is a bit harder to prepare. Thorium dioxide melts at 550 degrees higher temperatures than traditional Uranium dioxide, so very high temperatures are required to produce high-quality solid fuel. Additionally, Th is quite inert, making it difficult to chemically process. This is irrelevant for fluid-fueled reactors discussed below.
  • Irradiated Thorium is more dangerously radioactive in the short term. The Th-U cycle invariably produces some U-232, which decays to Tl-208, which has a 2.6 MeV gamma ray decay mode. Bi-212 also causes problems. These gamma rays are very hard to shield, requiring more expensive spent fuel handling and/or reprocessing.
  • Thorium doesn’t work as well as U-Pu in a fast reactor. While U-233 an excellent fuel in the thermal spectrum, it is between U-235 and Pu-239 in the fast spectrum. So for reactors that require excellent neutron economy (such as breed-and-burn concepts), Thorium is not ideal.

    What is nuclear? / Thorium As Nuclear Fuel: the good and the bad
 
Anyone who doesn't realize Iran will do what ever it takes to get a nuke is a fucking idiot.

Anyone who sees that Iran with nukes isn't going to get invaded by the US, will realise why Iran is so desperate.

I mean, look what happened to Iraq and Libya. Other OPEC countries who didn't like the US.

And then you realise why the right is so desperate to stop Iran getting nukes.


Do you have any idea why the OPEC countries in the mid east do not like us? I can't wait to hear your answer.

Your very question is fraught with such stupidity!
A) The very purpose of OPEC was to sell oil to the west dummy! Without the West there would be NO OPEC dumb f...K!
B) If they don't like us why are they doing business with the west? GEEZ how stupid!
OPEC countries:

Venezuela
298.40 billion barrels of proved reserves
$373.98 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 29.99 million

Saudi Arabia
265.79 billion barrels of proved reserves
$745.27 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 29.99 million

Iran
157.80 billion barrels of proved reserves
$366.26 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 77.10 million

Iraq
144.21 billion barrels of proved reserves
$229.33 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 35.10 million

Kuwait
101.5 billion barrels of proved reserves
$184.03 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 3.96 million

United Arab Emirates (UAE)
97.80 billion barrels of proved reserves
$396.24 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 8.46 million

Libya
48.36 billion barrels of proved reserves
$73.76 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 6.30 million

Nigeria
37.07 billion barrels of proved reserves
$515.79 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 172.29 million

Qatar
25.24 billion barrels of proved reserves
$202.17 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 2.01 million

Algeria
12.20 billion barrels of proved reserves
$223.86 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 38.30 million

Angola
9.01 billion barrels of proved reserves
$120.51 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 19.18 million

Ecuador
8.83 billion barrels of proved reserves
$93.58 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 15.78 million
Who Are the 12 OPEC Members? - 24/7 Wall St. Who Are the 12 OPEC Members?

FACTS!!!
in 2014 THE USA had 35% imported from OPEC....
In 1990 The USA had 51% imported from OPEC....
How much petroleum does the United States import and from where? - FAQ - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

Screen Shot 2015-09-12 at 9.18.21 AM.png


SO to answer your dumb ass question OPEC is losing oil exports to USA

Screen Shot 2015-09-12 at 9.28.53 AM.png
 
The Iran nuke deal was never about peaceful nuclear power. Anyone who makes that claim is either a liar, an idiot, or both.

Obozo wants his brother muslims in Iran to have nukes so they can destroy their common enemy Israel.

Some day you fools on the left will realize that obama is not who and what you think he is.

Obama doesn't want Republicans invading Iran. Simples.


But he wants Iran to destroy Israel. Got it.

You fools who think it was either this so-called deal or war are almost as stupid as the incompetent Kerry and Obama. This was not a deal, it was a surrender agreement.

Yes, I understand the rhetoric coming out of Iran.

However the US wanted to destroy the USSR and the USSR wanted to destroy the US. Did this mean that they actually threw nukes at each other?

Stupid? No. Actually people use their brains. Iran won't destroy Israel because they know what would come back at them. It's called MAD.

Saudi Arabia also wants to destroy Israel. The US lets them have loads of weapons.

I lived through the Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) and believe you me they didn't teach us to "duck and cover" based on guesses.
PLUS YOU are a f...king f...king LIAR.
Never in the history of the USA has there EVER BEEN a declared government policy to destroy another country! NEVER and much less
USSR! Where did you get your totally ignorant basic history of the USA???

Dumb s...ts like you fostering this anti-American rhetoric just as that dumb f...k president espousing the USA is the source of all ills!
half a million dead American soldiers are rolling over in their graves right now for your stupid ass-h...e comment "wanted to destroy USSR!

YOU and your comments ARE why we have dumb f...k terrorists wanting to destroy the USA!
They hear idiots like you espouse the USA wanted to destroy the USSR and they say "yup... goes right with what those politicians
were saying below and why we sending bomb-laden children to blow up US troops!"!!!
YOU don't even deserve to live in the USA with that kind of idiotic statement!

Remember John Kerry EARLIER wanted Bush to:
"Without a question, we need to disarm Saddam. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime .... to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real .... "Kerry , Jan . 23. 2003

Then he says this:
Senator Kerry (D) "American soldiers going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children."

U.S. Rep. John Murtha(D)"Our troops killed innocent civilians in cold blood,”
NOTE: Do you not believe the terrorists LOVED to hear our troops were cold blooded killers???

Durbin (D) "must have been done by Nazis, Soviets"--action of Americans in the treatment of their prisoners.

then Senator Obama said "troops are air-raiding villages and killing civilians,"

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid(D) "The war is lost, the surge is not accomplishing anything "

Don't you idiots get it??? Every time you faux-elite idiots make statements like "USA wanted destroy USSR" you are not only
spreading a f...king gigantic LIE but definitely performing a traitor's action by giving "aid and comfort to the enemy"!

MAD was what kept idiots like Nikita Khrushchev from expanding on his tantrum in the UN which I'm sure you've never heard about!

Nikita Khrushchev and the UN Shoe-Banging Incident

Yeah, they didn't teach you duck and cover for nothing. They taught it you to be scared. So they could manipulated you more easily.

As for your argument of "you're a fucking liar", jeez, is this the level we're at, high school nonsense level. Well, I'm out. Bye.
 
Anyone who doesn't realize Iran will do what ever it takes to get a nuke is a fucking idiot.

Anyone who sees that Iran with nukes isn't going to get invaded by the US, will realise why Iran is so desperate.

I mean, look what happened to Iraq and Libya. Other OPEC countries who didn't like the US.

And then you realise why the right is so desperate to stop Iran getting nukes.


Do you have any idea why the OPEC countries in the mid east do not like us? I can't wait to hear your answer.

Your very question is fraught with such stupidity!
A) The very purpose of OPEC was to sell oil to the west dummy! Without the West there would be NO OPEC dumb f...K!
B) If they don't like us why are they doing business with the west? GEEZ how stupid!
OPEC countries:

Venezuela
298.40 billion barrels of proved reserves
$373.98 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 29.99 million

Saudi Arabia
265.79 billion barrels of proved reserves
$745.27 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 29.99 million

Iran
157.80 billion barrels of proved reserves
$366.26 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 77.10 million

Iraq
144.21 billion barrels of proved reserves
$229.33 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 35.10 million

Kuwait
101.5 billion barrels of proved reserves
$184.03 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 3.96 million

United Arab Emirates (UAE)
97.80 billion barrels of proved reserves
$396.24 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 8.46 million

Libya
48.36 billion barrels of proved reserves
$73.76 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 6.30 million

Nigeria
37.07 billion barrels of proved reserves
$515.79 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 172.29 million

Qatar
25.24 billion barrels of proved reserves
$202.17 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 2.01 million

Algeria
12.20 billion barrels of proved reserves
$223.86 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 38.30 million

Angola
9.01 billion barrels of proved reserves
$120.51 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 19.18 million

Ecuador
8.83 billion barrels of proved reserves
$93.58 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 15.78 million
Who Are the 12 OPEC Members? - 24/7 Wall St. Who Are the 12 OPEC Members?

FACTS!!!
in 2014 THE USA had 35% imported from OPEC....
In 1990 The USA had 51% imported from OPEC....
How much petroleum does the United States import and from where? - FAQ - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

View attachment 50014

SO to answer your dumb ass question OPEC is losing oil exports to USA

View attachment 50015


don't attack me, I am on your side. maybe you responded to the wrong post.
 
Anyone who doesn't realize Iran will do what ever it takes to get a nuke is a fucking idiot.

Anyone who sees that Iran with nukes isn't going to get invaded by the US, will realise why Iran is so desperate.

I mean, look what happened to Iraq and Libya. Other OPEC countries who didn't like the US.

And then you realise why the right is so desperate to stop Iran getting nukes.


Do you have any idea why the OPEC countries in the mid east do not like us? I can't wait to hear your answer.

Your very question is fraught with such stupidity!
A) The very purpose of OPEC was to sell oil to the west dummy! Without the West there would be NO OPEC dumb f...K!
B) If they don't like us why are they doing business with the west? GEEZ how stupid!
OPEC countries:

Venezuela
298.40 billion barrels of proved reserves
$373.98 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 29.99 million

Saudi Arabia
265.79 billion barrels of proved reserves
$745.27 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 29.99 million

Iran
157.80 billion barrels of proved reserves
$366.26 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 77.10 million

Iraq
144.21 billion barrels of proved reserves
$229.33 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 35.10 million

Kuwait
101.5 billion barrels of proved reserves
$184.03 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 3.96 million

United Arab Emirates (UAE)
97.80 billion barrels of proved reserves
$396.24 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 8.46 million

Libya
48.36 billion barrels of proved reserves
$73.76 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 6.30 million

Nigeria
37.07 billion barrels of proved reserves
$515.79 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 172.29 million

Qatar
25.24 billion barrels of proved reserves
$202.17 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 2.01 million

Algeria
12.20 billion barrels of proved reserves
$223.86 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 38.30 million

Angola
9.01 billion barrels of proved reserves
$120.51 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 19.18 million

Ecuador
8.83 billion barrels of proved reserves
$93.58 billion in 2013 GDP
Population – 15.78 million
Who Are the 12 OPEC Members? - 24/7 Wall St. Who Are the 12 OPEC Members?

FACTS!!!
in 2014 THE USA had 35% imported from OPEC....
In 1990 The USA had 51% imported from OPEC....
How much petroleum does the United States import and from where? - FAQ - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

View attachment 50014

SO to answer your dumb ass question OPEC is losing oil exports to USA

View attachment 50015

All the while selling more to China. China, the country that's four times larger in terms of population.

The US is producing oil. OPEC is pumping out more oil to reduce oil prices and impact the US, trying to make it unprofitable for US companies to produce oil so OPEC can have more of an impact in the world.

But then if you knew stuff.....
 
Anyone who doesn't realize Iran will do what ever it takes to get a nuke is a fucking idiot.

Anyone who sees that Iran with nukes isn't going to get invaded by the US, will realise why Iran is so desperate.

I mean, look what happened to Iraq and Libya. Other OPEC countries who didn't like the US.

And then you realise why the right is so desperate to stop Iran getting nukes.


Do you have any idea why the OPEC countries in the mid east do not like us? I can't wait to hear your answer.

Sure. Plenty of reasons. You can't wait..... oh, poor you.
 
Why does Israel have Nukes? Seems to be a pretty big double standard going on. Several nations have Nuclear Weapons. Why not Iran? You have to see how Iran sees this.

I could give a shit how Iran see's anything.

The point you miss is that Iran would launch an attack against us if they thought they could get away with it. The mullahs are religious zealots and bat shit crazy to boot.

Israel has nukes but hasn't used them. Israel is a tiny country surrounded by enemies. If not for their nukes I'm sure they would have been attacked again by the Arabs.

Why does the U.S. feel it has the right to decide?

Jesus are you stupid. That's what being a super power is all about.

Doesn't make it right.

Doesn't make it wrong either.

Well, Iran sees it differently. And i'm sure if the situation were reverse, the U.S. would see it the same way. Why should a foreign nation be allowed to dictate things in a sovereign nation?
 
What gives the U.S. the right to decide who should or shouldn't have Nuclear Power? I know that question blows the average American's mind, but it is a valid question. Several nations have Nuclear Weapons. Should they all give them up?

Countries who approve of what terrorists do shouldn't have nukes.

Countries who stop what terrorists do should have nukes.

Not the reality. And the U.S. could be called a Terrorist Nation. How many countries has it invaded in recent years and how many women & children has it killed and maimed in the process? Is the U.S. really one to preach on such issues?
 
What gives the U.S. the right to decide who should or shouldn't have Nuclear Power? I know that question blows the average American's mind, but it is a valid question. Several nations have Nuclear Weapons. Should they all give them up?


Our National Security interests...unless you buy into the multi-cultural claptrap that all cultures and countries are morally and ethically the same.

We wouldn't tolerate foreign nations dictating anything in our country. Why should Iran?
 
What gives the U.S. the right to decide who should or shouldn't have Nuclear Power? I know that question blows the average American's mind, but it is a valid question. Several nations have Nuclear Weapons. Should they all give them up?

Countries who approve of what terrorists do shouldn't have nukes.

Countries who stop what terrorists do should have nukes.

Not the reality. And the U.S. could be called a Terrorist Nation. How many countries has it invaded in recent years and how many women & children has it killed and maimed in the process? Is the U.S. really one to preach on such issues?

Hey move to some country you think has a better humane record?
The country of Iraq was liberated from a dictator. Just too bad you didn't live in that country and see how happy the people really were to be rid of this evil person that used gas on his own people.

NOT one country has ever had to fear that the USA was going to kill thousands unless their leaders screwed the USA.
I am truly ashamed to call you an American if you are and if you aren't you are truly dumb as well as evil.
 
What gives the U.S. the right to decide who should or shouldn't have Nuclear Power? I know that question blows the average American's mind, but it is a valid question. Several nations have Nuclear Weapons. Should they all give them up?


Our National Security interests...unless you buy into the multi-cultural claptrap that all cultures and countries are morally and ethically the same.

We wouldn't tolerate foreign nations dictating anything in our country. Why should Iran?


Given that Iran has declared it will bring about the destruction of one of our allies (Israel), we have both a moral/ethical obligation as well as a national security interest in ensuring that Iran is not capable of carrying out such a campaign.
 
lets see now- Iran hates Israel, hates the US. Iran is a mostly muslim country. Iran has never been honest before- except when they say they hate Israel and want to wipe them off the map. Libs= theres nothing wrong with them having nukes.
 
Plus if they hadn't resumed nuclear weapons research there would be NO sanctions. No sanctions would mean they could sell more oil.
Doesn't make any sense and that is why simple people like me keep pointing out they don't need nuclear energy but want nuclear bombs!

First, who are we to tell a sovereign nation what kind of energy they should be using?

I mean, I'm sure a lot of countries which are suffering the effects of global warming would like to have a word with us about our gas-guzzling SUV's.

Second, energy isn't the only peaceful use of nuclear technology. For instance, it has medical uses.

Third, I'm pretty tired of watching MY COUNTRY say, "how high" every time the Zionists say "Jump".
 
Given that Iran has declared it will bring about the destruction of one of our allies (Israel), we have both a moral/ethical obligation as well as a national security interest in ensuring that Iran is not capable of carrying out such a campaign.

Actually, if the Zionists feel that threatened.

They can go the fuck back to Europe where they came from.
 
lets see now- Iran hates Israel, hates the US. Iran is a mostly muslim country. Iran has never been honest before- except when they say they hate Israel and want to wipe them off the map. Libs= theres nothing wrong with them having nukes.

Whole lot of flaws with that statement.

First, the whole world hates the Zionist Entity. Not just Iran.

Second, if Iran has a beef with us, it's becuase we propped up the Shah.

Iran has never invaded another country,

Andthey agreed to a treaty to give up nukes.
 

Forum List

Back
Top