Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And many of those same senators continue to ignore Trump’s corruption and criminality, particularly with regard to Trump being impeached a second time for his criminal, treasonous efforts to overturn the 2020 election – crimes which may result in Trump’s second Federal indictment.Right. I just think it's poetic justice that he is being indicted for essentially the same crimes Repub senators let him off the hook for. It's a bad look for every senator who voted to acquit. Will they be held to account by their constituents for their votes? Absolutely not.
Link?"Smith is a liberal hack who has had most of his stuff overturned and rejected."
"I just think it's poetic justice that he is being indicted for essentially the same crimes Repub senators let him off the hook for."
The impending indictment is about more than the events of 1/6. But Smith will present ample evidence to sustain a guilty verdict on the charge of obstructing an official act of Congress. Namely, the certification of the newly elected prez.I am not a defender of all things Orange, but I really thought the second impeachment was a farce as will be any indictment of Trump related to January 6th unless they can directly connect him to planning a violent protest. Nothing would surprise me from the clown car of people around him by that point, but unless you can put Trump's fingerprints on the starting gun, then nope.
Yes. Explained by the same reason they voted to acquit him. His continued popularity with the voting base. The truth be damned.And many of those same senators continue to ignore Trump’s corruption and criminality, particularly with regard to Trump being impeached a second time for his criminal, treasonous efforts to overturn the 2020 election – crimes which may result in Trump’s second Federal indictment.
Every senator who voted to acquit should be held to account in the voting booth. But I recognize that will not happen.Link?
Or merely an unvetted opinion on an internet social media site by an anonymous individual using a fake name?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You know, poster berg, that is an observation that had eluded me ---until you pointed it out.
Of course, you are right.
What that second impeachment was about is very likely what we will hear the DOJ prosecutors present as their case against Don Trump. In my personal opinion, we will hear many echoes from the riveting testimony we all watched on the telly in the J6 Congressional hearings last summer.
Don Trump was indicted (the impeachment) but not convicted due to jury nullification within the Senate. Think OJ Simpson. He too, was not convicted.
The parallels are obvious.
Link?
Or merely an unvetted opinion on an internet social media site by an anonymous individual using a fake name?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You know, poster berg, that is an observation that had eluded me ---until you pointed it out.
Of course, you are right.
What that second impeachment was about is very likely what we will hear the DOJ prosecutors present as their case against Don Trump. In my personal opinion, we will hear many echoes from the riveting testimony we all watched on the telly in the J6 Congressional hearings last summer.
Don Trump was indicted (the impeachment) but not convicted due to jury nullification within the Senate. Think OJ Simpson. He too, was not convicted.
The parallels are obvious.
americafirstpolicy.com
Link?
Or merely an unvetted opinion on an internet social media site by an anonymous individual using a fake name?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You know, poster berg, that is an observation that had eluded me ---until you pointed it out.
Of course, you are right.
What that second impeachment was about is very likely what we will hear the DOJ prosecutors present as their case against Don Trump. In my personal opinion, we will hear many echoes from the riveting testimony we all watched on the telly in the J6 Congressional hearings last summer.
Don Trump was indicted (the impeachment) but not convicted due to jury nullification within the Senate. Think OJ Simpson. He too, was not convicted.
The parallels are obvious.
The main crime of Trump's is not the riot alone, but the interference and obstruction, of the peaceful, constitutional transfer of power....I am not a defender of all things Orange, but I really thought the second impeachment was a farce as will be any indictment of Trump related to January 6th unless they can directly connect him to planning a violent protest. Nothing would surprise me from the clown car of people around him by that point, but unless you can put Trump's fingerprints on the starting gun, then nope.
The impending indictment is about more than the events of 1/6. But Smith will present ample evidence to sustain a guilty verdict on the charge of obstructing an official act of Congress. Namely, the certification of the newly elected prez.
Our constitution, hence our government, allows for interference and obstruction. Our constitution is designed to make things difficult. If anybody could do things easily, the democrats years ago would of changed us into a tyrannical dictatorship, which it is becoming.The main crime of Trump's is not the riot alone, but the interference and obstruction, of the peaceful, constitutional transfer of power....
