Women, gun control, and the GOP

kidrocks

Gold Member
Jan 23, 2012
3,315
380
130
Someday the NRA will be toppled.







Domestic violence: The next front in gun-control fight - CNN.com

Washington (CNN) -- The scene is intense: A man is ferociously knocking on a door while a woman inside the house calls 911, saying that her ex is trying to break in. A child sits on the couch.

The man bursts in and grabs the child, and the woman yells not to take the toddler. The man pulls out a gun. A shot rings out, and the screen goes black. A child cries out.

The violent domestic scenario is only a television ad from a gun control group, but it attempts to portray what some women face. It also depicts the next front in the gun control debate.
 
Someday the NRA will be toppled.







Domestic violence: The next front in gun-control fight - CNN.com

Washington (CNN) -- The scene is intense: A man is ferociously knocking on a door while a woman inside the house calls 911, saying that her ex is trying to break in. A child sits on the couch.

The man bursts in and grabs the child, and the woman yells not to take the toddler. The man pulls out a gun. A shot rings out, and the screen goes black. A child cries out.

The violent domestic scenario is only a television ad from a gun control group, but it attempts to portray what some women face. It also depicts the next front in the gun control debate.

This is going to backfire on them. What they forget is in most situations the man doesn't need the gun, he's bigger, meaner, and crazier. What WOULD stop the situation is a woman with a gun. Firearms are the great equalizer between the sexes.
 
Another volley in the commiecrats war on women. You always have to paint everyone as victims who require protection from the nanny state. How about they produce an ad showing the same scenario where the woman sends the kid to another room and blasts the SOB with a shotgun as soon as he breaks in the door? Let's empower women to take control of the situation instead of cowering and waiting for the calvary.
 
Commie heathens, the NRA isn't going anywhere and neither are our 300 million guns. You can't put a drooling James Brady, or the half-brained Gabby Giffords out there but they're not going anywhere.
 
Someday the NRA will be toppled.







Domestic violence: The next front in gun-control fight - CNN.com

Washington (CNN) -- The scene is intense: A man is ferociously knocking on a door while a woman inside the house calls 911, saying that her ex is trying to break in. A child sits on the couch.

The man bursts in and grabs the child, and the woman yells not to take the toddler. The man pulls out a gun. A shot rings out, and the screen goes black. A child cries out.

The violent domestic scenario is only a television ad from a gun control group, but it attempts to portray what some women face. It also depicts the next front in the gun control debate.

The counter ad is screamingly obvious.

"The man bursts in"...and the woman pulls out a gun. A shot rings out, and the screen goes black.
 
Last edited:
True "Girl Power" comes from a barrel of a Gun!
 

Attachments

  • $dont-let-them-take-your-gun-away.jpg
    $dont-let-them-take-your-gun-away.jpg
    46.8 KB · Views: 123
Someday the NRA will be toppled.




Domestic violence: The next front in gun-control fight - CNN.com

Washington (CNN) -- The scene is intense: A man is ferociously knocking on a door while a woman inside the house calls 911, saying that her ex is trying to break in. A child sits on the couch.

The man bursts in and grabs the child, and the woman yells not to take the toddler. The man pulls out a gun. A shot rings out, and the screen goes black. A child cries out.

The violent domestic scenario is only a television ad from a gun control group, but it attempts to portray what some women face. It also depicts the next front in the gun control debate.


This "violent domestic scenario" is exactly why a person should own a gun. I've seen the video. If the woman had a gun, the guy would be dead before he got past the door's threshold. He was a clear and present danger and it would've been a clear case of self-defense if the woman fragged him.

But Liberals would rather this woman be murdered and the kid abducted then have the bad guy dead.

The ad is a MAJOR FAIL!!
 
Someday the NRA will be toppled.







Domestic violence: The next front in gun-control fight - CNN.com

Washington (CNN) -- The scene is intense: A man is ferociously knocking on a door while a woman inside the house calls 911, saying that her ex is trying to break in. A child sits on the couch.

The man bursts in and grabs the child, and the woman yells not to take the toddler. The man pulls out a gun. A shot rings out, and the screen goes black. A child cries out.

The violent domestic scenario is only a television ad from a gun control group, but it attempts to portray what some women face. It also depicts the next front in the gun control debate.

Someday you will grow up.

Maybe.

Ever wonder what women think about your paternalistic, misogynistic, attitude? Watch The View.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/media/368023-the-view-reacts-to-bloomberg-s-ad.html#post9533573
 
Someday the NRA will be toppled.







Domestic violence: The next front in gun-control fight - CNN.com

Washington (CNN) -- The scene is intense: A man is ferociously knocking on a door while a woman inside the house calls 911, saying that her ex is trying to break in. A child sits on the couch.

The man bursts in and grabs the child, and the woman yells not to take the toddler. The man pulls out a gun. A shot rings out, and the screen goes black. A child cries out.

The violent domestic scenario is only a television ad from a gun control group, but it attempts to portray what some women face. It also depicts the next front in the gun control debate.

This is going to backfire on them. What they forget is in most situations the man doesn't need the gun, he's bigger, meaner, and crazier. What WOULD stop the situation is a woman with a gun. Firearms are the great equalizer between the sexes.






LOL... You'd make a great Hollywood director because it's only in the movies in which your simple little scenario would play out. Not in the real world.

In the real world, it's the bigger, meaner, crazier man who needs and owns that gun that he WILL use to kill. Much easier with a gun and oh so convenient. Firearms are the great destroyer of lives between the sexes in most violent situations.
 
Last edited:
My aunt didn't use a gun on her ex abusive husband, she just open his stomach with a knife and let him bleed to death..
 
Someday the NRA will be toppled.







Domestic violence: The next front in gun-control fight - CNN.com

Washington (CNN) -- The scene is intense: A man is ferociously knocking on a door while a woman inside the house calls 911, saying that her ex is trying to break in. A child sits on the couch.

The man bursts in and grabs the child, and the woman yells not to take the toddler. The man pulls out a gun. A shot rings out, and the screen goes black. A child cries out.

The violent domestic scenario is only a television ad from a gun control group, but it attempts to portray what some women face. It also depicts the next front in the gun control debate.




You truly are a moron. Take away the one thing that can actually save a woman's life. What a total misogynistic asshole you are.
 
Someday the NRA will be toppled.







Domestic violence: The next front in gun-control fight - CNN.com

Washington (CNN) -- The scene is intense: A man is ferociously knocking on a door while a woman inside the house calls 911, saying that her ex is trying to break in. A child sits on the couch.

The man bursts in and grabs the child, and the woman yells not to take the toddler. The man pulls out a gun. A shot rings out, and the screen goes black. A child cries out.

The violent domestic scenario is only a television ad from a gun control group, but it attempts to portray what some women face. It also depicts the next front in the gun control debate.




You truly are a moron. Take away the one thing that can actually save a woman's life. What a total misogynistic asshole you are.

They are most willing to sacrifice a woman and her child if it furthers the progressive agenda.
 

This is going to backfire on them. What they forget is in most situations the man doesn't need the gun, he's bigger, meaner, and crazier. What WOULD stop the situation is a woman with a gun. Firearms are the great equalizer between the sexes.






LOL... You'd make a great Hollywood director because it's only in the movies in which your simple little scenario would play out. Not in the real world.

In the real world, it's the bigger, meaner, crazier man who needs and owns that gun that he WILL use to kill. Much easier with a gun and oh so convenient. Firearms are the great destroyer of lives between the sexes in most violent situations.

Yet three out of four of the hosts of The View feel safer with a gun.

Maybe you should stop pretending you are intelligent.
 
Someday the NRA will be toppled.




Domestic violence: The next front in gun-control fight - CNN.com

Washington (CNN) -- The scene is intense: A man is ferociously knocking on a door while a woman inside the house calls 911, saying that her ex is trying to break in. A child sits on the couch.

The man bursts in and grabs the child, and the woman yells not to take the toddler. The man pulls out a gun. A shot rings out, and the screen goes black. A child cries out.

The violent domestic scenario is only a television ad from a gun control group, but it attempts to portray what some women face. It also depicts the next front in the gun control debate.


This "violent domestic scenario" is exactly why a person should own a gun. I've seen the video. If the woman had a gun, the guy would be dead before he got past the door's threshold. He was a clear and present danger and it would've been a clear case of self-defense if the woman fragged him.

But Liberals would rather this woman be murdered and the kid abducted then have the bad guy dead.

The ad is a MAJOR FAIL!!





If the women had a gun the perp would probably wait and ambush her somewhere along the way.

If the women had a gun there would probably be a shoot-out in which the women and the kid would end up dead.

If the women had a gun she'd have to keep it nearby, ready in a moments notice and that's a big risk (accidental shooting) to put her kid in harms way like that.

If the women had a gun she'd have to have the nerve... most women wouldn't.

In my opinion those are the facts Jack. Consider them all.

Yours is always a perfect scenario, (women shoots, kills perp, end of story). In the real world all of the above actually come into play.
 
This is going to backfire on them. What they forget is in most situations the man doesn't need the gun, he's bigger, meaner, and crazier. What WOULD stop the situation is a woman with a gun. Firearms are the great equalizer between the sexes.






LOL... You'd make a great Hollywood director because it's only in the movies in which your simple little scenario would play out. Not in the real world.

In the real world, it's the bigger, meaner, crazier man who needs and owns that gun that he WILL use to kill. Much easier with a gun and oh so convenient. Firearms are the great destroyer of lives between the sexes in most violent situations.

Yet three out of four of the hosts of The View feel safer with a gun.

Maybe you should stop pretending you are intelligent.





WOW! 3 out of the 4 hosts of the View, huh?

LOL... how ignorant can YOU get?

I'll await.
 


This "violent domestic scenario" is exactly why a person should own a gun. I've seen the video. If the woman had a gun, the guy would be dead before he got past the door's threshold. He was a clear and present danger and it would've been a clear case of self-defense if the woman fragged him.

But Liberals would rather this woman be murdered and the kid abducted then have the bad guy dead.

The ad is a MAJOR FAIL!!





If the women had a gun the perp would probably wait and ambush her somewhere along the way.

If the women had a gun there would probably be a shoot-out in which the women and the kid would end up dead.

If the women had a gun she'd have to keep it nearby, ready in a moments notice and that's a big risk (accidental shooting) to put her kid in harms way like that.

If the women had a gun she'd have to have the nerve... most women wouldn't.

In my opinion those are the facts Jack. Consider them all.

Yours is always a perfect scenario, (women shoots, kills perp, end of story). In the real world all of the above actually come into play.






So, using your logic (is that what this sort of thinking is called???) ALL cops should immediately be disarmed based on the fact that a high percentage are shot by their own weapons.

Is that what you're saying?
 
so my post didnt show up

this is the exact reason

the woman should be fully trained and have access to a firearm

then such needless tragedies will stop

---------------------------

“They’re very upset,” says Brett King, defense attorney for the alleged shooter. “There was a domestic incident that morning. The deceased was actually escorted off the property and actually taken to Jefferson County. And best we know right now is he actually walked on foot back the seven miles, was back in the house when he was discovered by the mother and the son. And soon there after he was shot.”
“There is a history of domestic violence,” says King. “And it is our understanding that he aggressively attacked her the day before the shooting in Jefferson County.”
Although there is only one incident of a domestic dispute on record in Blount County at the Locust Fork home, it’s on the same day as the fatal shooting. Famed defense attorney Charles Salvagio, who is not representing the family, believes this is a clear cut case of self defense.

Locust Fork shooting could fall under ?stand your ground? | WIAT 42
 


This "violent domestic scenario" is exactly why a person should own a gun. I've seen the video. If the woman had a gun, the guy would be dead before he got past the door's threshold. He was a clear and present danger and it would've been a clear case of self-defense if the woman fragged him.

But Liberals would rather this woman be murdered and the kid abducted then have the bad guy dead.

The ad is a MAJOR FAIL!!





If the women had a gun the perp would probably wait and ambush her somewhere along the way.

If the women had a gun there would probably be a shoot-out in which the women and the kid would end up dead.

If the women had a gun she'd have to keep it nearby, ready in a moments notice and that's a big risk (accidental shooting) to put her kid in harms way like that.

If the women had a gun she'd have to have the nerve... most women wouldn't.

In my opinion those are the facts Jack. Consider them all.

Yours is always a perfect scenario, (women shoots, kills perp, end of story). In the real world all of the above actually come into play.


If the women had a gun she'd have to have the nerve... most women wouldn't.

bs

A single mother in Georgia used a firearm to stop a car thief on Friday night. The attempted theft took place just one night after the woman’s apartment was broken into.
Among the items stolen – the spare key to her Jeep. Fearing that the suspect(s) may return, the woman kept her handgun close by.
When she heard someone trying to steal her car the very next night, she leapt into action. The woman saw what was happening from her balcony and then ran outside with her firearm.
The woman told the suspect to stop, but he did not comply. The woman then opened fire on the suspect, emptying the magazine of her firearm.
The suspect jumped out of the passenger door of the vehicle and fled the scene. He remains at large.

Mom shoots at burglar trying to steal her car - WTVM.com-Columbus, GA News Weather & Sports
 

Forum List

Back
Top