Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Straw man. He's was saying that's how the Democrat party views women and he's right.
Nope, he's wrong, and the term has cost him any opportunity for the candidacy.
He's toast.
He didn't have a shot anyway. He was right. It's not a straw man. That's how democrats really view woman.
More like probably!Huckabee doesn't care about the fate of the GOP at the national level. All he cares about is being able to blow the dog whistle properly for the rightwing nuts that now fill his pockets.
Possibly, but I took his "comments" to be an attempt to place the gop's position that the govt has no role in creating universal access to contraception in a light that not only makes some public policy sense but also shows some moral/social responsibility ... and of course the gop fails miserably at this, which is why we largely only succeed in attracting the female votes of whites, and older whites at that.
Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree - Los Angeles Times
your cheating aint going to work
Pissing on 70 % of Americans wont fly if you cant cheat in elelctions
Doonsbury recently ran a strip in which republican officeholders are being coached by an expert on how to deal with women effectivly, in order to start gaining their trust and support for the GOP. In one panel, the coach asks, "So, let's say that you say something really out of line and insulting about women in general, in the heat of a debate with a woman candidate. What do you do to win back the support of the women ". In the next panel, a senator raises his hand and replies, "Send her flowers?". The coach replies, "You would think so, but, surprisingly....."
I quit reading at "Doonsbury".
Political cartoons are not reality, sport.
This story's punchline:
"In 2005, Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee signed a law mandating Arkansas insurance plans provide contraception coverage, including church-affiliated organizations such as hospitals and universities."
What everybody's getting wrong about Mike Huckabee's 'libido' quip - The Week
Huckabee: Dems say women need government to 'control their libido' - NBC Politics
"If the Democrats want to insult women by making them believe that they are helpless without Uncle Sugar coming in and providing for them a prescription each month for birth control because they cannot control their libido or their reproductive system
What is the matter with you women? Can't keep your legs closed?
These idiots will just never learn, will they.
So if birth control is a die hard guarantee that women won't have unexpected babies...why are there more unexpected babies now than there were in the days before birth control was available?
In other words, your argument sucks.
In the days before birth control, women had 5-6 babies
What does birth control have to do with a womans libido?
This story's punchline:
"In 2005, Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee signed a law mandating Arkansas insurance plans provide contraception coverage, including church-affiliated organizations such as hospitals and universities."
What everybody's getting wrong about Mike Huckabee's 'libido' quip - The Week
Huckabee is Uncle Sugar?
I would think that sexual desire has a lot to do with birth control. The premise of the thread is almost as silly as your question, be it in different ways.What does birth control have to do with a womans libido?
So if birth control is a die hard guarantee that women won't have unexpected babies...why are there more unexpected babies now than there were in the days before birth control was available?
In other words, your argument sucks.
In the days before birth control, women had 5-6 babies
And had conversations with doctors saying things like "MAKE him leave you alone! Because if you get pregnant again, you will die."
This is getting just looney
What does birth control have to do with a womans libido?
What does birth control have to do with a womans libido?
what a troll of your own stupid threads...
None of you libs look intelligent in here
or you pulling my chain: 
