martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 83,049
- 34,365
You believe roofie-rape is a cake walk that doesn't cause harm?StMDEFEND already posted it.Nah, you might get more guys slobbering over you but that doesn't make them rapists. Go ahead and show us the data that proves your point.It doesn't make the victim responsible unless the law is changed to say that the victims' dress is a mitigating factor.
You are dealing with absolutes, not risk. So you are telling me there is no increase in risk for a woman if she dresses provocatively in a bar? Zero risk increase?
Show me the data that proves it isn't.
I want to see you type it, "Appearance does not increase the risk of rape, either violent on the street rape, or roofie-bar rape"
Appearance does not increase the risk of rape, either violent on the street rape, or roofie-bar type rape.
Rape is not about sex. It is about hurting people.
Some forms of rape is not about sex, for on the street pull the woman in the corner rape, it's about power. I disagree on some of the roofie guys though, for them its about getting laid the easiest way possible.
Some pathologies cannot be typcast in neat little boxes.
Not even close. Both are rape, and both are to be punished as severely as the law allows. I'm discussing the pathologies of the people perpetrating them, not saying roofie guy should get a pass because he is roofie guy. Roofie guy is probably worse from a law enforcement perspective because his method leaves the victim often without memory of what actually happened.
Again, you have to separate a frank discussion or risk factors and mitigation of those risks, vs. any desire to see a woman ignoring said risk factors being held against her. (for the record, I don't see any of these risk factors, dress, travel mode, location as grounds for mitigation of the crime. Punish the bastards no matter what, and do it hard.