Esmeralda
Diamond Member
I wonder why he is not suing for defamation of character. If someone accused you publicly through the written word, would you file a lawsuit for libel?
No?
Of course you wouldn't.
Now, lets get to the question.
Why isn't he suing? Is he suing? Lets keep an eye on it. Cause if he does not file anything, that is all I will need to know.
Oh thats right. The girl "believes she is telling the truth."
Cause marrying their adapted daughter and taking nude of photos of her when he was a middle aged man, is not creepy enough. Yeah, nothing there.
Say, isn't there at least ONE WITNESS to this? The nanny?
One reason that seems very obvious why he doesn't sue: he would look like such a villian! It is something that would be very hurtful to Dylan, whether she was molested or whether it is a false memory: it would be shattering for her, but more important, he would look worse, a worse villian for putting her through more agony. I don't know if he cares about her at all, but he does care about himself, and his image.
Well, we can say there is no evidence. Sometimes the witness being abused is considered to be evidence. In fact, it is often used as evidence. I asked this before. I thought there was one witness, the nanny.
Also, if you need more evidence than that, then you are saying that the girl could be flat out lying. There is no other way to put it. She is emphatic and direct about it. Now, you can do the old liberal thing and take on both sides of the issue by claiming, "well, I believe she believes it happened."
That is just a pathetic attempt to obfuscate from the real contention. You either believe her, or you doubt her claims. Now, if you doubt her claims, that means she is LYING. She went into some real detail, and from the stand point of the EXPERTS who are either criminal forensic psychologists, or people who have experienced these things, they almost all believe her accounts.
Plus, when you consider the other things (marrying a young girl and reportedly taking nude photos of her when she was 18) all coincides with a man whose morals are skewed. At least their judgement is.
You and seemingly the entire left wants to turn this into an official court room. Which is where the notion of INNOCENT TILL PROVEN GUILTY belongs. Opinions on this can be expressed. Yes, even opinions of guilt. People can actually have an opinion of guilt or innocence.
I think he guilty as hell. I think he is creepy as hell.
Now, why don't you tell us your opinion. Don't give us this crap about evidence. What is your opinion? Is the girl lying or not.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Now watch folks. How liberals are totally incapable providing a simple yes or no. What is the definition of "is?"
Behold their double talk and bullshit.
You have very obviously not read any of my previous posts and are just looking for a fight and to make this a political left versus right thing. It isn't. It is not a political issue. And I do not march in lockstep with every liberal in America or on the planet.