World Trade Center's North Tower on Sept. 11, 2001.

[Gamolon]

.how did the mass increase when the concrete was pulverized and huge steel beams were sent flying outward ?were did the energy to do that come from in a free fall collapse ? ...if it happened as you say you would expect to see floors stacked like pancakes and the core remaining

Are you telling me that if I have a 10 ton slab of concrete and pulverize it, I no longer have ten tons?

Holy shit!



The mass increased because as the mass came down it gathered the mass of the other floors and components as each was destroyed.

 

[Gamolon]

...if it happened as you say you would expect to see floors stacked like pancakes and the core remaining

You mean like records on a spindle? Where the spindle is the core and the records are the floors?

Do you realize what was on the mechanical floors in the core itself? Huge elevator motors? Huge control panels?

The mass above the failed structural components tore everything apart on it's way down. Why do you think the perimeter columns peeled away like banana peels? Explain how this occurred?

 

[MikeK]

Putting aside all the Physics 101 exercises there are but two possible ways the Twin Towers and Building #7 could have been collapsed. One way is that which we've all seen and what we've been told, which is the effect of the fires caused by the two airliners crashing into Towers 1 & 2. The other way is the so-called "Inside Job" conspiracy.

If there was in fact a conspiracy to bring down the Towers by coordinating a controlled demolition with strikes by two airliners having been successfully hijacked by suicidal Islamic shahids the questions I have are:

(1) Who would be in a position to conceive, organize, finance and manage such an elaborate and intricate project and what would motivate such an individual?

(2) Considering that a demolition project of this size has never been attempted, and that there are only three demolition contractors in the entire U.S. who are capable of attempting such an extraordinary project (provided the Towers are empty during the work), and that access to the utility corridors, where an intricately timed web of charges would be wired, is controlled by an armed security force, and that those corridors are constantly in use by maintenance crews who necessarily would observe the progress of the incredibly bizzare activity, and keeping mind that the smaller the individual crews the longer the job would take, how many of the highly-skilled and experienced sappers would be required?

(3) Considering the size and scope of a crime of this magnitude, even if it were possible to carry out is it conceivable that so many individuals, most of whom are very ordinary and patriotic Americans, would agree to take part in it and to never reveal the horrific secret to anyone for any reason?

Does anyone really believe it is possible?

 

[DiveCon]

Pills are science-based, so you don't believe in them.

dont tell me what i do or dont believe in, moron

You're a science-denier.

nope, clearly thats you if you believe the troofer bullshit

 

[Obamerican]

You have the formula...do your own math fuck head....

See I know the answer.
You dont, but you keep referring to this magic mythical number. Provide it so people can judge for themselves if it is reasonable.

What was the design capacity for each floor and what was the combined weight of the floors about the impact site?

I know the answer I am just not playing your childish game...and if it is seconds instead of MPH...it is hardly a magical number...dipshit

Still spewing shit, asswipe? Fucking moron.

 

[eots]

.how did the mass increase when the concrete was pulverized and huge steel beams were sent flying outward ?were did the energy to do that come from in a free fall collapse ? ...if it happened as you say you would expect to see floors stacked like pancakes and the core remaining

Are you telling me that if I have a 10 ton slab of concrete and pulverize it, I no longer have ten tons?

Holy shit!

that is like comparing water to steam or rock to dust...if the dust was mot dispersed into giant clouds and contained you would then only be ables to maintain the same mass

 

[eots]

If an EXTERIOR panel fell in the range of 10 seconds, that might be close to free fall. OF course, there's nothing to impede the fall of an EXTERIOR panel, so that conclusion isn't exactly a surprise, now, is it?

The estimates (should I put "estimates" in bold and large font?) for the collapse of the INTERIOR structures do not come CLOSE to 10 seconds. This MIGHT have something to do with the fact that there WAS stuff impeding the fall of INTERIOR items.

"FREE FALL" claim these Troofer idiots.

"No," respond the folks who prove that the Troofers are making shit up.

"But but but, NIST said it," respond the idiot Troofers.

"Again, no," point out the ones trying to educate the Troofers, "that's not what NIST said!"

And then the Troofers simply and mindlessly loop what they've already said.

how could the outer stucture offer zero resitence ??
and what was visable to you in the interior as the exteror felll rapidly before it ?

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

The majority of the towers consisted of open space between the core and the out supports.
What outside forces present would have made the towers collapse in any manner other then into its own footprint?

uneven damage...uneven distribution of fire would not create a symetrical and complete collapse in seconds not once but three times !!!...give your head a shake

So fire is going to cause the mass fueled by increasing kinetic energy of the falling object to deviate away from its foot print in the alloted time?

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

The majority of the towers consisted of open space between the core and the out supports.
What outside forces present would have made the towers collapse in any manner other then into its own footprint?

uneven damge...uneven distrubiton of fire would not create a symetrical and complete collapse in seconds not once but three times !!!...give your head a shake

Given the uneven heating on the floor joist what would the effect be on the angle clps

I guess you missed this question.

 

[Obamerican]

uneven damge...uneven distrubiton of fire would not create a symetrical and complete collapse in seconds not once but three times !!!...give your head a shake

Given the uneven heating on the floor joist what would the effect be on the angle clps

I guess you missed this question.

No he didn't.

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

Putting aside all the Physics 101 exercises there are but two possible ways the Twin Towers and Building #7 could have been collapsed. One way is that which we've all seen and what we've been told, which is the effect of the fires caused by the two airliners crashing into Towers 1 & 2. The other way is the so-called "Inside Job" conspiracy.

If there was in fact a conspiracy to bring down the Towers by coordinating a controlled demolition with strikes by two airliners having been successfully hijacked by suicidal Islamic shahids the questions I have are:

(1) Who would be in a position to conceive, organize, finance and manage such an elaborate and intricate project and what would motivate such an individual?

(2) Considering that a demolition project of this size has never been attempted, and that there are only three demolition contractors in the entire U.S. who are capable of attempting such an extraordinary project (provided the Towers are empty during the work), and that access to the utility corridors, where an intricately timed web of charges would be wired, is controlled by an armed security force, and that those corridors are constantly in use by maintenance crews who necessarily would observe the progress of the incredibly bizzare activity, and keeping mind that the smaller the individual crews the longer the job would take, how many of the highly-skilled and experienced sappers would be required?

(3) Considering the size and scope of a crime of this magnitude, even if it were possible to carry out is it conceivable that so many individuals, most of whom are very ordinary and patriotic Americans, would agree to take part in it and to never reveal the horrific secret to anyone for any reason?

Does anyone really believe it is possible?

The people who planted the explosive were the 168 "victims" of the Oklahoma bombing lead by T.Mcviegh, a CIA operative and an Alien from another Galaxy .It was conceived of by the Joooos .

 

[eots]

Putting aside all the Physics 101 exercises there are but two possible ways the Twin Towers and Building #7 could have been collapsed. One way is that which we've all seen and what we've been told, which is the effect of the fires caused by the two airliners crashing into Towers 1 & 2. The other way is the so-called "Inside Job" conspiracy.

If there was in fact a conspiracy to bring down the Towers by coordinating a controlled demolition with strikes by two airliners having been successfully hijacked by suicidal Islamic shahids the questions I have are:

(1) Who would be in a position to conceive, organize, finance and manage such an elaborate and intricate project and what would motivate such an individual?

(2) Considering that a demolition project of this size has never been attempted, and that there are only three demolition contractors in the entire U.S. who are capable of attempting such an extraordinary project (provided the Towers are empty during the work), and that access to the utility corridors, where an intricately timed web of charges would be wired, is controlled by an armed security force, and that those corridors are constantly in use by maintenance crews who necessarily would observe the progress of the incredibly bizzare activity, and keeping mind that the smaller the individual crews the longer the job would take, how many of the highly-skilled and experienced sappers would be required?

(3) Considering the size and scope of a crime of this magnitude, even if it were possible to carry out is it conceivable that so many individuals, most of whom are very ordinary and patriotic Americans, would agree to take part in it and to never reveal the horrific secret to anyone for any reason?

Does anyone really believe it is possible?

The people who planted the explosive were the 168 "victims" of the Oklahoma bombing lead by T.Mcviegh, a CIA operative and an Alien from another Galaxy .It was conceived of by the Joooos .

how does any of this explain the failure of NIST ?

 

[Liability]

If an EXTERIOR panel fell in the range of 10 seconds, that might be close to free fall. OF course, there's nothing to impede the fall of an EXTERIOR panel, so that conclusion isn't exactly a surprise, now, is it?

The estimates (should I put "estimates" in bold and large font?) for the collapse of the INTERIOR structures do not come CLOSE to 10 seconds. This MIGHT have something to do with the fact that there WAS stuff impeding the fall of INTERIOR items.

"FREE FALL" claim these Troofer idiots.

"No," respond the folks who prove that the Troofers are making shit up.

"But but but, NIST said it," respond the idiot Troofers.

"Again, no," point out the ones trying to educate the Troofers, "that's not what NIST said!"

And then the Troofers simply and mindlessly loop what they've already said.

how could the outer stucture offer zero resitence ??
and what was visable to you in the interior as the exteror felll rapidly before it ?

The outer stucture [sic] fell -- outward. The only resitence [sic] would be -- air -- you moron.

Not much of anything was visable [sic] in the interior as the exteror [sic] felll [sic], douchey.

The view of the interior was largely obstructed by the crumbling remains of the building, dust and smoke.

Your questions (even discounting your basic illiteracy) are irrelevant.

Feel free to come back and fail yet again, though.

 

[elvis]

If an EXTERIOR panel fell in the range of 10 seconds, that might be close to free fall. OF course, there's nothing to impede the fall of an EXTERIOR panel, so that conclusion isn't exactly a surprise, now, is it?

The estimates (should I put "estimates" in bold and large font?) for the collapse of the INTERIOR structures do not come CLOSE to 10 seconds. This MIGHT have something to do with the fact that there WAS stuff impeding the fall of INTERIOR items.

"FREE FALL" claim these Troofer idiots.

"No," respond the folks who prove that the Troofers are making shit up.

"But but but, NIST said it," respond the idiot Troofers.

"Again, no," point out the ones trying to educate the Troofers, "that's not what NIST said!"

And then the Troofers simply and mindlessly loop what they've already said.

how could the outer stucture offer zero resitence ??
and what was visable to you in the interior as the exteror felll rapidly before it ?

The outer stucture [sic] fell -- outward. The only resitence [sic] would be -- air -- you moron.

Not much of anything was visable [sic] in the interior as the exteror [sic] felll [sic], douchey.

The view of the interior was largely by the crumbling remains of the building, dust and smoke.

Your questions (even discounting your basic illiteracy) are irrelevant.

Feel free to come back and fail yet again, though.

if explosives had been used, there'd have been a big mound of debris, it wouldn't have traveled god knows how many blocks down the street.

 

[eots]

If an EXTERIOR panel fell in the range of 10 seconds, that might be close to free fall. OF course, there's nothing to impede the fall of an EXTERIOR panel, so that conclusion isn't exactly a surprise, now, is it?

The estimates (should I put "estimates" in bold and large font?) for the collapse of the INTERIOR structures do not come CLOSE to 10 seconds. This MIGHT have something to do with the fact that there WAS stuff impeding the fall of INTERIOR items.

"FREE FALL" claim these Troofer idiots.

"No," respond the folks who prove that the Troofers are making shit up.

"But but but, NIST said it," respond the idiot Troofers.


it feel outward...wow the rest of the world must have missed that part
"Again, no," point out the ones trying to educate the Troofers, "that's not what NIST said!"

And then the Troofers simply and mindlessly loop what they've already said.

how could the outer stucture offer zero resitence ??
and what was visable to you in the interior as the exteror felll rapidly before it ?

The outer stucture [sic] fell -- outward. The only resitence [sic] would be -- air -- you moron.

Not much of anything was visable [sic] in the interior as the exteror [sic] felll [sic], douchey.

The view of the interior was largely obstructed by the crumbling remains of the building, dust and smoke.

Your questions (even discounting your basic illiteracy) are irrelevant.

Feel free to come back and fail yet again, though.

wow it fell outward did it ..the rest of the world must have missed that...dimwit

 

[DiveCon]

how could the outer stucture offer zero resitence ??
and what was visable to you in the interior as the exteror felll rapidly before it ?

The outer stucture [sic] fell -- outward. The only resitence [sic] would be -- air -- you moron.

Not much of anything was visable [sic] in the interior as the exteror [sic] felll [sic], douchey.

The view of the interior was largely obstructed by the crumbling remains of the building, dust and smoke.

Your questions (even discounting your basic illiteracy) are irrelevant.

Feel free to come back and fail yet again, though.

wow it fell outward did it ..the rest of the world must have missed that...dimwit

no, it seems only the troofer morons

 

[elvis]

The outer stucture [sic] fell -- outward. The only resitence [sic] would be -- air -- you moron.

Not much of anything was visable [sic] in the interior as the exteror [sic] felll [sic], douchey.

The view of the interior was largely obstructed by the crumbling remains of the building, dust and smoke.

Your questions (even discounting your basic illiteracy) are irrelevant.

Feel free to come back and fail yet again, though.

wow it fell outward did it ..the rest of the world must have missed that...dimwit

no, it seems only the troofer morons

yeah the building collapsed into its own footprint. the debris was limited to the tower property..

 

[DiveCon]

wow it fell outward did it ..the rest of the world must have missed that...dimwit

no, it seems only the troofer morons

yeah the building collapsed into its own footprint. the debris was limited to the tower property..

yeah, just amazing how that stuff struck out at other buildings and magically got right back into the footprint

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

uneven damge...uneven distrubiton of fire would not create a symetrical and complete collapse in seconds not once but three times !!!...give your head a shake

Given the uneven heating on the floor joist what would the effect be on the angle clps

I guess you missed this question.

 

[eots]

lol... dimwit thinks he is the riddler...and that he is actually saying something ...what a dork