Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dear, China is a state and so is ohio and both want jobs!! Ohio could ban trade , make their own cars, and thus create 1000's of jobs, 1+1=2 Do you understand??
I understand you're a fucking idiot. China is a country... a Communist country. It's not a state and not part of the United States. Ohio can't ban trade because they are a state in the United States who has a Constitution with a Commerce Clause... so just shut your ignorant pie hole.
You seem so determined to always show how stupid you are? Why? Now Chinese purchase 22 million a year. This is growth from 0, 30 years under liberal communism. there is every reason to think cars and movie sales and general standards of living will continue to improve for all in China at 5-10% per year well into the future.That means, about 150 million Chinese are among the ruling class... they purchased 7.2 million cars in 2006.
Dear, China is a state and so is ohio and both want jobs!! Ohio could ban trade , make their own cars, and thus create 1000's of jobs, 1+1=2 Do you understand??
I understand you're a fucking idiot. China is a country... a Communist country. It's not a state and not part of the United States. Ohio can't ban trade because they are a state in the United States who has a Constitution with a Commerce Clause... so just shut your ignorant pie hole.
dear, the point is that if idiot liberals had their way ohio would ban trade with other states and nations to preserve jobs in Ohio. They could create 1000's of jobs by making their own cars for example. Now have I made it simple enough for you to understand
You seem so determined to always show how stupid you are? Why? Now Chinese purchase 22 million a year. This is growth from 0, 30 years under liberal communism. there is every reason to think cars and movie sales and general standards of living will continue to improve for all in China at 5-10% per year well into the future.That means, about 150 million Chinese are among the ruling class... they purchased 7.2 million cars in 2006.
Now do you understand?
China doesn't play by our rules and has a completely different rule book.
Dear, China is a state and so is ohio and both want jobs!! Ohio could ban trade , make their own cars, and thus create 1000's of jobs, 1+1=2 Do you understand??
I understand you're a fucking idiot. China is a country... a Communist country. It's not a state and not part of the United States. Ohio can't ban trade because they are a state in the United States who has a Constitution with a Commerce Clause... so just shut your ignorant pie hole.
dear, the point is that if idiot liberals had their way ohio would ban trade with other states and nations to preserve jobs in Ohio. They could create 1000's of jobs by making their own cars for example. Now have I made it simple enough for you to understand
No, I doubt the people of Ohio are as stupid as you... so they wouldn't. For instance, they would realize they have no iron ore or coal to make steel with and they need steel to build a car. And this is the case with most things that are manufactured... you have to first have resources... they don't just magically appear because you want to make something.
So no jobs would be created and there would be no car production in Ohio. This is ultimately why our founders created something called the "commerce clause" ...so that trade between states would happen, ensuring that all states have the opportunity to obtain various things from other states and sell things they make in their state. And this works well in a free market system because we're all playing by the same rules and using the same rule book... the Constitution. China doesn't play by our rules and has a completely different rule book.
You seem so determined to always show how stupid you are? Why? Now Chinese purchase 22 million a year. This is growth from 0, 30 years under liberal communism. there is every reason to think cars and movie sales and general standards of living will continue to improve for all in China at 5-10% per year well into the future.That means, about 150 million Chinese are among the ruling class... they purchased 7.2 million cars in 2006.
Now do you understand?
Well, I was responding to the graphic posted which showed 7.2 million sold in 2006 and that's what I said... So go fuck yourself.
The only place standards of living are improving in China is among the ruling class elite, which comprise about 15% of their population. Those people are doing quite well but they are the vast minority of the population. The other 85% are living in abject poverty, the likes of which you will never know.
. But I'm not going to continue wasting my time responding to you.
The only place standards of living are improving in China is among the ruling class elite, which comprise about 15% of their population. Those people are doing quite well but they are the vast minority of the population. The other 85% are living in abject poverty, the likes of which you will never know.
It's been done in the past , it can be done in the future.Could a protectionist win either party's nomination?
It's been done in the past , it can be done in the future.Could a protectionist win either party's nomination?
Licoln was both republican and protectionist.
It's been done in the past , it can be done in the future.Could a protectionist win either party's nomination?
Licoln was both republican and protectionist.
Well, sure, mercantilism was America's economic system until 1947 GATT. We haven't had a protectionist president in over a half century though.
It's been done in the past , it can be done in the future.Could a protectionist win either party's nomination?
Licoln was both republican and protectionist.
It's been done in the past , it can be done in the future.Could a protectionist win either party's nomination?
Licoln was both republican and protectionist.
protecting and crippling our companies is an idea so 100% stupid only a liberal would approve of it.
protecting and crippling our companies is an idea so 100% stupid only a liberal would approve of it.It's been done in the past , it can be done in the future.Could a protectionist win either party's nomination?
Licoln was both republican and protectionist.
protecting and crippling our companies is an idea so 100% stupid only a liberal would approve of it.
Lol. What?
"Free Trade" Was Never Really About Trade
"Free trade" is not trade. Basically, trade is when each country makes things of value for export and gets things of comparable value in imports. In modern globalization, other countries manipulate their currencies, use tax strategies that distort exports and imports, and apply effective well-designed industrial policies to build manufacturing capacity. They export more products to us, and import fewer products from us.
Our trade deficits since NAFTA are over $8 trillion. With trade deficits this large, we are not trading. We are letting other countries produce for us. We borrow, de-industrialize, and ultimately fail to capitalize on future production opportunities. That's not trade. That's getting picked clean.
protecting and crippling our companies is an idea so 100% stupid only a liberal would approve of it.It's been done in the past , it can be done in the future.Could a protectionist win either party's nomination?
Licoln was both republican and protectionist.
protecting and crippling our companies is an idea so 100% stupid only a liberal would approve of it.
Lol. What?