would hillary clinton have invaded Venezuela yet?

[TNHarley]

Considering she likes to beat the war drums herself, my money says yes.
Would the democrats back her in that decision?

 

[Likkmee]

Wrong question again. Would BILL ? Answer ? NO WAY. He's a lot of things. Stupid isn't on that list.

 

[Tehon]

Considering she likes to beat the war drums herself, my money says yes.
Would the democrats back her in that decision?

The roles would be entirely reversed.

And you wouldn't be trying to deflect.

 

[tycho1572]

Sober or drunk?

 

[MisterBeale]

Considering she likes to beat the war drums herself, my money says yes.
Would the democrats back her in that decision?

The roles would be entirely reversed.

And you wouldn't be trying to deflect.

Not sure your post makes any sense.

It's a hypothetical question. What is the deflection? What roles are reversed?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Considering she likes to beat the war drums herself, my money says yes.
Would the democrats back her in that decision?

Is this your way of diverting attention away from the empty threats by Pompeo?

 

[Timmy]

Considering she likes to beat the war drums herself, my money says yes.
Would the democrats back her in that decision?

Based on what ? When has she been a war hawk?

 

[Tehon]

Considering she likes to beat the war drums herself, my money says yes.
Would the democrats back her in that decision?

The roles would be entirely reversed.

And you wouldn't be trying to deflect.

Not sure your post makes any sense.

It's a hypothetical question. What is the deflection? What roles are reversed?

The partisan roles would be reversed. For and against.

What purpose does it serve to ask a hypothetical question at this point?

 

[Tehon]

Considering she likes to beat the war drums herself, my money says yes.
Would the democrats back her in that decision?

Based on what ? When has she been a war hawk?

You're not serious?

 

[JGalt]

Considering she likes to beat the war drums herself, my money says yes.
Would the democrats back her in that decision?

She would have, and probably would have gotten a number of American soldiers killed in the process. Obama's and Hillary's concept of "Rules of Engagement" are not the way you want to go to war by.

 

[Manonthestreet]

Better question, would she have gotten us into a confrontation with Russia over Assad?

 

[tycho1572]

Considering she likes to beat the war drums herself, my money says yes.
Would the democrats back her in that decision?

Based on what ? When has she been a war hawk?

You're not serious?

Timmy is another example of the democrats voter base.

 

[TNHarley]

Considering she likes to beat the war drums herself, my money says yes.
Would the democrats back her in that decision?

The roles would be entirely reversed.

And you wouldn't be trying to deflect.

Deflect from what?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Considering she likes to beat the war drums herself, my money says yes.
Would the democrats back her in that decision?

No idea, pointless speculation

 

[Rambunctious]

We would be so bogged down in the middle east she wouldn't be able to rally support but she would try....
Thank God for Trump...like him or hate him he kept that lunatic woman out of the White House......

 

[TNHarley]

Considering she likes to beat the war drums herself, my money says yes.
Would the democrats back her in that decision?

Is this your way of diverting attention away from the empty threats by Pompeo?

I was simply asking a question.
I fully believe, and wouldnt be surprised, if trump went in there. And i damn sure wouldnt support it.
Does hillary get you all hot and sweaty or something?
Is that why you completely ignore the OP?

 

[TNHarley]

Considering she likes to beat the war drums herself, my money says yes.
Would the democrats back her in that decision?

The roles would be entirely reversed.

And you wouldn't be trying to deflect.

Not sure your post makes any sense.

It's a hypothetical question. What is the deflection? What roles are reversed?

The partisan roles would be reversed. For and against.

What purpose does it serve to ask a hypothetical question at this point?

What purpose do most of these political threads have?

 

[TNHarley]

Considering she likes to beat the war drums herself, my money says yes.
Would the democrats back her in that decision?

She would have, and probably would have gotten a number of American soldiers killed in the process. Obama's and Hillary's concept of "Rules of Engagement" are not the way you want to go to war by.

You wouldnt support trump if he invaded?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Considering she likes to beat the war drums herself, my money says yes.
Would the democrats back her in that decision?

Is this your way of diverting attention away from the empty threats by Pompeo?

I was simply asking a question.
I fully believe, and wouldnt be surprised, if trump went in there. And i damn sure wouldnt support it.
Does hillary get you all hot and sweaty or something?
Is that why you completely ignore the OP?

If it were not for you people on this forum that are still obsessed with her, I would honestly go the rest of my life and never think about her.

Not once have I looked at situation in the last 2 years and thought "I wonder what Hillary would have done".

but, if it makes you happy to still obsess over her, more power to you.

 

[Tehon]

Considering she likes to beat the war drums herself, my money says yes.
Would the democrats back her in that decision?

The roles would be entirely reversed.

And you wouldn't be trying to deflect.

Deflect from what?

Never mind, it's not important.
I think we would be in about the same predicament.

But if she had already invaded, then we would be in the driver's seat.