Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Some sort of religion has existed since man first became aware. not so sure about gays, if that was the case Adam and Eve would have been masterbating and the story of the Bible would have been pretty short.Always?religion has aways existed and homosexual couples cant change that....the excuse of religious zealots who'd like to ignore the 14th and treat gays as second class. ^
Yes. And changing a word does not change that situation.
homosexual couples have always existed and the religious zealots can't ever change that 'situation'.
religions has always existed and no homosexual has ever changed that (not for the lack of trying)religion have aways existed and homosexual couples cant change that....the excuse of religious zealots who'd like to ignore the 14th and treat gays as second class. ^
Yes. And changing a word does not change that situation.
Gay couples have always existed and no religion has ever changed that. (Not for lack of trying)
Im afraid they do if it infringes on their constitutional rights.and a business has a right to exclude for various reasons. A Christian based bakery has legal foundation to deny being involved in a gay wedding.A bakery is not a church. A bakery in a state with PA laws must follow the law.Who was forcing a bakery to bake wedding cakes before gay marriage.not really, to be same means that churches could be forced to perform the wedding.
Who was forcing churches to perform weddings before there was legal gay marriage?
Just like Wal Mart has a right not to sell a confederate flag.
A Business does not get a special exclusion from the law if the owners are Christian.
and a business has a right to exclude for various reasons. A Christian based bakery has legal foundation to deny being involved in a gay wedding.A bakery is not a church. A bakery in a state with PA laws must follow the law.Who was forcing a bakery to bake wedding cakes before gay marriage.Who was forcing churches to perform weddings before there was legal gay marriage?
Just like Wal Mart has a right not to sell a confederate flag.
Not necessarily. It depends upon the state and the protected classes.
yeah that is where I wanted to enter the conversation.
I can see a motel room / medicine / food and I am sure a few more items that would be considered necessary to continue a comfortable life.
I don't see that cakes fall into that train of thought, any one who forces a baker to bake or any one to serve another against the servers personal feelings is wrong.
You can make people do things through laws, but you can't make them like it.
While this SCOTUS see's things that way, it doesn't make it majority popular and is certainly reversable.
I compare you folks to all those old temperance bitch's who danced and celebrated when temperance became law.
That was that America, the America that was right around the corner sure shit all over that law and the temperance movement.
When I read all the spilled milk post by the fag crowd seeking acceptance and waving their legal victories around, I can't help but picture all those fucking Teetotalers and their disappointment when it all came crashing down.
That crash is coming, will the voices of the gays be as loud as those of the temperance movement??
the state can not override your constitutional rights.and a business has a right to exclude for various reasons. A Christian based bakery has legal foundation to deny being involved in a gay wedding.A bakery is not a church. A bakery in a state with PA laws must follow the law.Who was forcing a bakery to bake wedding cakes before gay marriage.not really, to be same means that churches could be forced to perform the wedding.
Who was forcing churches to perform weddings before there was legal gay marriage?
Just like Wal Mart has a right not to sell a confederate flag.
Not necessarily. It depends upon the state and the protected classes.
religion has always existed and homosexual couples cant change that.
after eons of living in the closet and silently accepting second class status out of fear, homosexual couples simply petitioned their state governments for equal treatment under the law..they weren't asking for anything religious from the state.
nonetheless, religious zealots have been freaking out for decades, thus putting the gay "issue" on the nightly news for their children to be horrified over - or not, gasp! - and now the legal path has finally been reconciled regarding gay couples...
imo Jesus would humbly approve.
"render to Caesar that which is Caesar's"
"what you do to the least of my brothers you do unto me"
"do unto others..." etcetera
the state can not override your constitutional rights.and a business has a right to exclude for various reasons. A Christian based bakery has legal foundation to deny being involved in a gay wedding.A bakery is not a church. A bakery in a state with PA laws must follow the law.Who was forcing a bakery to bake wedding cakes before gay marriage.Who was forcing churches to perform weddings before there was legal gay marriage?
Just like Wal Mart has a right not to sell a confederate flag.
Not necessarily. It depends upon the state and the protected classes.
the state can not override your constitutional rights.and a business has a right to exclude for various reasons. A Christian based bakery has legal foundation to deny being involved in a gay wedding.A bakery is not a church. A bakery in a state with PA laws must follow the law.Who was forcing a bakery to bake wedding cakes before gay marriage.Who was forcing churches to perform weddings before there was legal gay marriage?
Just like Wal Mart has a right not to sell a confederate flag.
Not necessarily. It depends upon the state and the protected classes.
why would you include me, I agree that homosexual marriage should be allowed. Its just that I also agree that the constitution protects people from catering to them if it is a real religious issue for them.and a business has a right to exclude for various reasons. A Christian based bakery has legal foundation to deny being involved in a gay wedding.A bakery is not a church. A bakery in a state with PA laws must follow the law.Who was forcing a bakery to bake wedding cakes before gay marriage.
Just like Wal Mart has a right not to sell a confederate flag.
Not necessarily. It depends upon the state and the protected classes.
I compare you folks to all those old temperance bitch's who danced and celebrated when temperance became law.
I compare you folks to all those segregation bitches who fought so hard to keep the blacks from being treated equally.
I compare you folks to all those anti-women bitches who wanted to deny women the vote.
You are the haters.
religion has always existed and homosexual couples cant change that.
after eons of living in the closet and silently accepting second class status out of fear, homosexual couples simply petitioned their state governments for equal treatment under the law..they weren't asking for anything religious from the state.
nonetheless, religious zealots have been freaking out for decades, thus putting the gay "issue" on the nightly news for their children to be horrified over - or not, gasp! - and now the legal path has finally been reconciled regarding gay couples...
imo Jesus would humbly approve.
"render to Caesar that which is Caesar's"
"what you do to the least of my brothers you do unto me"
"do unto others..." etcetera
Great a clueless faggot out spoutin scripture like she gonna use it to her defense.
Hey dumb faggot, the bible teaches homosexuality is vile and disgusting
An abomination in the eyes of God and Nature ......................
religions has always existed and no homosexual has ever changed that (not for the lack of trying)religion have aways existed and homosexual couples cant change that....the excuse of religious zealots who'd like to ignore the 14th and treat gays as second class. ^
Yes. And changing a word does not change that situation.
Gay couples have always existed and no religion has ever changed that. (Not for lack of trying)
the state can not override your constitutional rights.and a business has a right to exclude for various reasons. A Christian based bakery has legal foundation to deny being involved in a gay wedding.A bakery is not a church. A bakery in a state with PA laws must follow the law.Who was forcing a bakery to bake wedding cakes before gay marriage.
Just like Wal Mart has a right not to sell a confederate flag.
Not necessarily. It depends upon the state and the protected classes.
True. However, the PA laws have been found by the courts not to do that. So again... it depends upon the state and the protected classes.[/QUOT]
If the PA law states that you have to ignore your Christian belief, then the PA law is violating the constitutional law that says that you are free to exorcise those beliefs.
and a business has a right to exclude for various reasons. A Christian based bakery has legal foundation to deny being involved in a gay wedding.A bakery is not a church. A bakery in a state with PA laws must follow the law.Who was forcing a bakery to bake wedding cakes before gay marriage.
Just like Wal Mart has a right not to sell a confederate flag.
Not necessarily. It depends upon the state and the protected classes.
yeah that is where I wanted to enter the conversation.
I can see a motel room / medicine / food and I am sure a few more items that would be considered necessary to continue a comfortable life.
I don't see that cakes fall into that train of thought, any one who forces a baker to bake or any one to serve another against the servers personal feelings is wrong.
You can make people do things through laws, but you can't make them like it.
While this SCOTUS see's things that way, it doesn't make it majority popular and is certainly reversable.
I compare you folks to all those old temperance bitch's who danced and celebrated when temperance became law.
That was that America, the America that was right around the corner sure shit all over that law and the temperance movement.
When I read all the spilled milk post by the fag crowd seeking acceptance and waving their legal victories around, I can't help but picture all those fucking Teetotalers and their disappointment when it all came crashing down.
That crash is coming, will the voices of the gays be as loud as those of the temperance movement??
The temperance movement lost because they were stopping people from doing what they wanted to do. The anti-SSM movement lost for the same reason. People aren't seeking acceptance, they are demanding it. Good for them.
why would you include me, I agree that homosexual marriage should be allowed. Its just that I also agree that the constitution protects people from catering to them if it is a real religious issue for them.and a business has a right to exclude for various reasons. A Christian based bakery has legal foundation to deny being involved in a gay wedding.A bakery is not a church. A bakery in a state with PA laws must follow the law.
Just like Wal Mart has a right not to sell a confederate flag.
Not necessarily. It depends upon the state and the protected classes.
I compare you folks to all those old temperance bitch's who danced and celebrated when temperance became law.
I compare you folks to all those segregation bitches who fought so hard to keep the blacks from being treated equally.
I compare you folks to all those anti-women bitches who wanted to deny women the vote.
You are the haters.
I know the left is an all or nothing type of group but really, its possible for everyone to be satisfied here with just a little common sense.
and a business has a right to exclude for various reasons. A Christian based bakery has legal foundation to deny being involved in a gay wedding.A bakery is not a church. A bakery in a state with PA laws must follow the law.
Just like Wal Mart has a right not to sell a confederate flag.
Not necessarily. It depends upon the state and the protected classes.
yeah that is where I wanted to enter the conversation.
I can see a motel room / medicine / food and I am sure a few more items that would be considered necessary to continue a comfortable life.
I don't see that cakes fall into that train of thought, any one who forces a baker to bake or any one to serve another against the servers personal feelings is wrong.
You can make people do things through laws, but you can't make them like it.
While this SCOTUS see's things that way, it doesn't make it majority popular and is certainly reversable.
I compare you folks to all those old temperance bitch's who danced and celebrated when temperance became law.
That was that America, the America that was right around the corner sure shit all over that law and the temperance movement.
When I read all the spilled milk post by the fag crowd seeking acceptance and waving their legal victories around, I can't help but picture all those fucking Teetotalers and their disappointment when it all came crashing down.
That crash is coming, will the voices of the gays be as loud as those of the temperance movement??
The temperance movement lost because they were stopping people from doing what they wanted to do. The anti-SSM movement lost for the same reason. People aren't seeking acceptance, they are demanding it. Good for them.
The society had fallen into such disgust and vile that it was easy for the Christians to come in and put homosexuality back into the closet in Rome.
.
Great a clueless faggot out spoutin scripture like she gonna use it to her defense.
Hey dumb faggot, the bible teaches homosexuality is vile and disgusting
An abomination in the eyes of God and Nature ......................
and a business has a right to exclude for various reasons. A Christian based bakery has legal foundation to deny being involved in a gay wedding.A bakery is not a church. A bakery in a state with PA laws must follow the law.
Just like Wal Mart has a right not to sell a confederate flag.
Not necessarily. It depends upon the state and the protected classes.
yeah that is where I wanted to enter the conversation.
I can see a motel room / medicine / food and I am sure a few more items that would be considered necessary to continue a comfortable life.
I don't see that cakes fall into that train of thought, any one who forces a baker to bake or any one to serve another against the servers personal feelings is wrong.
You can make people do things through laws, but you can't make them like it.
While this SCOTUS see's things that way, it doesn't make it majority popular and is certainly reversable.
I compare you folks to all those old temperance bitch's who danced and celebrated when temperance became law.
That was that America, the America that was right around the corner sure shit all over that law and the temperance movement.
When I read all the spilled milk post by the fag crowd seeking acceptance and waving their legal victories around, I can't help but picture all those fucking Teetotalers and their disappointment when it all came crashing down.
That crash is coming, will the voices of the gays be as loud as those of the temperance movement??
The temperance movement lost because they were stopping people from doing what they wanted to do. The anti-SSM movement lost for the same reason. People aren't seeking acceptance, they are demanding it. Good for them.
The temperance movement lost because that is not who we were societally.
Religion forced that change, gays have forced this change.
Eventually the good people will have enough and things will change.
That's the way it went down in Rome.
The society had fallen into such disgust and vile that it was easy for the Christians to come in and put homosexuality back into the closet in Rome.
History will repeat itself.
Matthew 10:15, "Truly I say to you, it will be more tolerable for theland of Sodom and Gomorrah in the day of judgment than for that city."
- Matthew 19:4-6, "And He answered and said, 'Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning made them male and female, 5 and said, ‘For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’? 6 So they are no longer two, but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate.'”
You do realize that the big thing in Sodom and Gomorrah was the practice of homosexuality right?
and it goes on to specify that marriage, or the joining is between a man and his wife.
Indirectly Jesus does speak against homosexuality.
look up and read the beatitudes, they also mention that the homosexual will not inherit the riches of Heaven.
but, you knew all of this already.
