OohPooPahDoo
Gold Member
- May 11, 2011
- 15,347
- 985
I believe my social security contributions should go in to an account that I have control over. I should be able to invest it or assign an investment manager to handle investing it for me. The money in the account should be my property, the government should not be able to include it in the general fund and 'borrow' it as they do now. If I pass away before I collect my contributions the remaining balance should be transferred to my heirs.
How do we pay current beneficiares?
The leftists keep telling us the fund is solvent. Therefore, technically there is sufficient funds to pay current beneficiaries while those coming up can be gradually weaned off the system. If we don't do it, the whole thing collapses somewhere on down the line.
I agree with OohPoo except that I don't think the government should be collecting social security taxes at all, but should provide a means for all of us to establish our own tax free accounts as they do now with 401Ks, IRAs and such. Ditto with medical savings accounts that the people can draw from for their medical needs or, if they stay healthy, can use for anything they want after a time. What greater incentive would promote the general welfare than that?
And employers could choose to contribute to those tax free accounts as an extra employee benefit if they chose to do so. What greater incentive would attract quality people to work for you?
There are so many ways to accomplish the general welfare other than a nanny state or forcing people to do what they should be doing for themselves.
I still don't see where the money to pay current beneficiaries is supposed to come from when we divert FICA to private accounts. None of the private-account people seem to want to explain this to me. The Trust Fund itself would only last 4-5 years or so without FICA revenues.