Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
Zionist Fascist Traitors give that answer.
And mentally ill morons give your answer.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Zionist Fascist Traitors give that answer.
Wudda you mean,"100,000"? Which 2 digits are you looking at?2 significant digits from 100,000 plus years ago
The significance of trailing zeros in a number not containing a decimal point can be ambiguous. For example, it may not always be clear if the number 1300 is precise to the nearest unit (just happens coincidentally to be an exact multiple of a hundred) or if it is only shown to the nearest hundreds due to rounding or uncertainty. Many conventions exist to address this issue. However, these are not universally used and would only be effective if the reader is familiar with the convention:
As the conventions above are not in general use, the following more widely recognized options are available for indicating the significance of number with trailing zeros:
- An overline, sometimes also called an overbar, or less accurately, a vinculum, may be placed over the last significant figure; any trailing zeros following this are insignificant. For example, 1300 has three significant figures (and hence indicates that the number is precise to the nearest ten).
- Less often, using a closely related convention, the last significant figure of a number may be underlined; for example, "1300" has two significant figures.
- A decimal point may be placed after the number; for example "1300." indicates specifically that trailing zeros are meant to be significant.[8]
- Eliminate ambiguous or non-significant zeros by changing the unit prefix in a number with a unit of measurement. For example, the precision of measurement specified as 1300 g is ambiguous, while if stated as 1.30 kg it is not. Likewise 0.0123 L can be rewritten as 12.3 mL
- Eliminate ambiguous or non-significant zeros by using Scientific Notation: For example, 1300 with three significant figures becomes 1.30×103. Likewise 0.0123 can be rewritten as 1.23×10−2. The part of the representation that contains the significant figures (1.30 or 1.23) is known as the significand or mantissa. The digits in the base and exponent (103 or 10−2) are considered exact numbers so for these digits, significant figures are irrelevant.
- Explicitly state the number of significant figures (the abbreviation s.f. is sometimes used): For example "20 000 to 2 s.f." or "20 000 (2 sf)".
- State the expected variability (precision) explicitly with a plus–minus sign, as in 20 000 ± 1%. This also allows specifying a range of precision in-between powers of ten.
And mentally ill morons give your answer.
Wudda you mean,"100,000"? Which 2 digits are you looking at?
First try practicing what you preach:
That's a steel framed building that housed CIA and FBI offices, and that CIA office is where the drone 767 CARGO VERSION that hit the south tower was controlled.
Let all Patriotic Americans see who here is a patriotic American and who is a Zionist Fascist supporter of mass murder, treason, looting America, starting wars over lies and hate hoaxes all to benefit country Israel and the Zionist Fascists who support it...
I'll pray they find a cure for your mental defect.
It is called tectonic plate movement. The original definition of ice age was done under the assumption that land was fixed and did not move. Land does move, and that is a huge problem for the Co2 fraud and the "definition of ice age" they use.
This is the fault in the center of the Atlantic. It slants SW to NE, meaning it is pushing Europe SE (why Europe's glaciers have been melting for tens of millions of years) and Greenland NW (why Greenland just entered continent specific ice age)
Amazing, isn't it. Continents move away from the pole warm. Continents that move towards the pole cool.
Wow.
If you can't understand that...
Patriotism to America is not a "mental defect" and the SS and the KGB were 100% correct about Judaism being
"not a religion, just a conspiracy against everyone else"
and WTC 7 is Exhibit A of the proof...
Patriotism to America is not a "mental defect" and the SS and the KGB were 100% correct about Judaism being
"not a religion, just a conspiracy against everyone else"
and WTC 7 is Exhibit A of the proof...
I actually am a geologist, so know far more about plate tectonics than you ever will. And we have now moved beyond that simple description, because it wasn't accurate enough.
And no, plate tectonics has a very, very small impact on global temps. The SUN, is the driver of climate. Plate tectonics, specifically orographic effects can have an impact, but only in terms of pushing the climate regions around a little bit. The Amazon rain forest has a far greater impact on climate than ALL of the mountains in the region.
I'm using simple terms for you because you are a simpleton.
Why is every piece of land within 600 miles of a pole covered in ice age glacier?
There are 70 million year old dinosaur fossils on Antarctica. Did those live on top of 2 miles of ice age -60F? Where was Antarctica 70 million years ago, on the South Pole or halfway to Africa?
Rejection of the clear truth of Greenland vs NA and Europe is rejection of 100% documented truth and no ability to refute, except by name calling, changing the subject, and lying, all three your treasonous rear end just did for the whole USMB to see regarding WTC 7
You are a FUCKING TRAITOR, an ENEMY of AMERICA. KNOW THAT!!!
Anyone who quotes the SS, and then claims to be a patriotic American is a fucking nutjob.
LACK OF SUNLIGHT WITH SUFFICIENT ENERGY TO WARM THE PLACE UP!
DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
The SUN, is the driver of climate
Everyone who pushes the Solar Cycle here has been unable to answer the following question.
WHAT does the SUN CHANGE on EARTH regarding climate?
A: it doesn't because it is CONSTANT
The SUN is an argument that Faux "News" likes because it is 100% wrong and morons parrot it....
The SUN is NOT constant you uneducated baboon!
For Earth purposes it is. The fluctuations in the output of the Sun are incredibly minor and statistically insignificant, and the weather on Earth proves it.
WHAT DOES THE SUN CHANGE in regards to EARTH CLIMATE??
Start the Jeopardy! music, this is question #2 this sick Zionist Fascist Traitor cannot answer...
Maunder Minimum - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
"The Maunder Minimum, also known as the "prolonged sunspot minimum", was a period around 1645 to 1715 during which sunspots became exceedingly rare. During a 28-year period (1672–1699) within the minimum, observations revealed fewer than 50 sunspots. This contrasts with the typical 40,000–50,000 sunspots seen in modern times over a similar timespan"
TOO FUNNY!!! Tell us of the marvelous EQUIPMENT USED in 1672 to find sunspots....
This is what they did with canes. When the satellites first went up, we saw storms that never hit land that we did not see before the satellites. The Co2 fraud used that to claim "more storms" = not kidding.
"The Maunder Minimum was first noted by Gustav Spörer in publications in 1887 and 1889"
LOL!! "first noted" 200 years later, wow, that's good. FIRST NOTED 200 years LATER....
"The term Maunder Minimum was popularised by John A. Eddy,[7] who published a landmark paper in Science in 1976.[8]"
You cannot make this shit up. Think it through, people, this is a good example of Co2 fraud "science."
WE NOTICED FEWER SUNSPOTS. When? in 1672. Using what equipment???
When did we first record this info? 200 years LATER....
What is the evidence? Well, it was published in Science, so it must be true because a BEAKED BIRDBRAIN can PARROT IT...
wiki also busts little ice age...
The Maunder Minimum occurred within the Little Ice Age, a long period of lower-than-average European (NOT GLOBAL, JUST EUROPE) temperatures.
AS the saying goes, for the SUN (Solar Cycle) Theory which was FUNDED and PUT OUT BY THE Co2 FRAUD (which is why Faux loves it) for IDIOTS to PARROT...
Is this controlled demolition or not?