WTC-7 Was NOT A Controlled Demolition Inside Job

[DiveCon]

Wow. You really ARE fucking stupid aren't you? The whole argument here is whether steel structures can be affected by office fires to a point of failure. I am trying to explain to that it IS possible in that there are two ways

.

the question dickhead was at what temperature does steel start to weaken and when it starts to weaken is not relevant what is relevant is at what temperature is steel weakened enough to initiate a collapse...stupid...

Why you and everyone else keeps stating that steel needs to melt in order to fail is beyond me. You people (truthers) are the only people on this planet who don't get the fact that steel weakens AND expands and can cause structures to fail

no one said it had to melt stupid..the claim is there was molten metal present at the wtc

this building is still standing chump

That's it? You did your best? Your "best" is providing incorrect information as evidence to support your claim based on what you THINK you remember?

yes and two mins later i found and posted the correct information....moron

not the metal only part, moronic chump

 

[eots]

Wow. You really ARE fucking stupid aren't you? The whole argument here is whether steel structures can be affected by office fires to a point of failure. I am trying to explain to that it IS possible in that there are two ways

.

the question dickhead was at what temperature does steel start to weaken and when it starts to weaken is not relevant what is relevant is at what temperature is steel weakened enough to initiate a collapse...stupid...





no one said it had to melt stupid..the claim is there was molten metal present at the wtc

this building is still standing chump

That's it? You did your best? Your "best" is providing incorrect information as evidence to support your claim based on what you THINK you remember?

yes and two mins later i found and posted the correct information....moron

not the metal only part, moronic chump

apples and oranges ..chumply

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zv7BImVvEyk]YouTube - WTC7 -- This is an Orange[/ame]

 

[DiveCon]

.

the question dickhead was at what temperature does steel start to weaken and when it starts to weaken is not relevant what is relevant is at what temperature is steel weakened enough to initiate a collapse...stupid...





no one said it had to melt stupid..the claim is there was molten metal present at the wtc

this building is still standing chump





yes and two mins later i found and posted the correct information....moron

not the metal only part, moronic chump

apples and oranges ..chumply

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zv7BImVvEyk]YouTube - WTC7 -- This is an Orange[/ame]

sorry, but its apples to apples

 

[candycorn]

.

the question dickhead was at what temperature does steel start to weaken and when it starts to weaken is not relevant what is relevant is at what temperature is steel weakened enough to initiate a collapse...stupid...





no one said it had to melt stupid..the claim is there was molten metal present at the wtc

this building is still standing chump





yes and two mins later i found and posted the correct information....moron

not the metal only part, moronic chump

apples and oranges ..chumply

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zv7BImVvEyk]YouTube - WTC7 -- This is an Orange[/ame]

 

[Gamolon]

The problem with the Thermal Expansion Theory is that heat energy passes back and forth within the steel-frame networks from hotter to cooler areas, which spreads the energy out evenly to 'all' areas. There was simply NOT nearly enough building fire energy to even begin expanding the entire steel-frame network to do this:

This Is Controlled Demolition!!

What a dope.

The yield strength of steel is reduced to about half at 550 ºC. At 1000 ºC, the yield strength is 10 percent or less. Because of its high thermal conductivity, the temperature of unprotected internal steelwork normally will vary little from that of the fire. Structural steelwork is, therefore, usually insulated.

The above quote is taken from this site The Effects of Fire on Structural Systems | ASHI Reporter

You need to educate yourself.

The point is that thermal expansion makes steel expand thus snapping bolted/welded connections. Not only that, but fire will reduce the strength of steel. These TWO things put together can cause failure.

The fact that you are denying that these two particular affects do not happen just goes to show how stupid you really are.

 

[Gamolon]

apples and oranges ..chumply

Nope. Both steel structure collapsed due to fire. Even though the entire building did not collapse, the steel part did. This PROVES that a steel structure can collapse due to fire.

 

[Trojan]

apples and oranges ..chumply

Nope. Both steel structure collapsed due to fire. Even though the entire building did not collapse, the steel part did. This PROVES that a steel structure can collapse due to fire.

Logic and truthers are not friends

 

[eots]

apples and oranges ..chumply

Nope. Both steel structure collapsed due to fire. Even though the entire building did not collapse, the steel part did. This PROVES that a steel structure can collapse due to fire.

nothing like the controled manner which the wtc 7 fell



[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zv7BImVvEyk]YouTube - WTC7 -- This is an Orange[/ame]

 

[Trojan]

apples and oranges ..chumply

Nope. Both steel structure collapsed due to fire. Even though the entire building did not collapse, the steel part did. This PROVES that a steel structure can collapse due to fire.

nothing like the controled manner which the wtc 7 fell



[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zv7BImVvEyk]YouTube - WTC7 -- This is an Orange[/ame]

The controlled demolitions have loud explosions for all to hear

strange i don't hear them for WTC 7 -- why is that?

Supernanothermite?

 

[Trojan]

. . . and without damaging the surrounding buildings???

GL,

Terral

Fiterman Hall across the street was destroyed in the collapse of WTC 7

Game set match

 

[eots]

. . . and without damaging the surrounding buildings???

GL,

Terral

Fiterman Hall across the street was destroyed in the collapse of WTC 7

Game set match

game set match pffft in your dreams...so how did every vertical support beam at the wtc 7 all fail at precisely the same moment with random and unevenly dispersed fire and damage

 

[DiveCon]

. . . and without damaging the surrounding buildings???

GL,

Terral

Fiterman Hall across the street was destroyed in the collapse of WTC 7

Game set match

game set match pffft in your dreams...so how did every vertical support beam at the wtc 7 all fail at precisely the same moment with random and unevenly dispersed fire and damage

they didnt

thats just another one of your moronic troofer lies

 

[Trojan]

. . . and without damaging the surrounding buildings???

GL,

Terral

Fiterman Hall across the street was destroyed in the collapse of WTC 7

Game set match

game set match pffft in your dreams...so how did every vertical support beam at the wtc 7 all fail at precisely the same moment with random and unevenly dispersed fire and damage

Terral's claim is that WTC7 fell and did not damage nearby buildings -- when it came down, it destroyed the building directly across the street.

He has either lied or is ignorant -- you decide which.

 

[eots]

Fiterman Hall across the street was destroyed in the collapse of WTC 7

Game set match

game set match pffft in your dreams...so how did every vertical support beam at the wtc 7 all fail at precisely the same moment with random and unevenly dispersed fire and damage

they didnt

thats just another one of your moronic troofer lies

really then why did it not then topple over or have a partial collapse ?..how did it fall so quickly and evenly and completely then..

 

[DiveCon]

game set match pffft in your dreams...so how did every vertical support beam at the wtc 7 all fail at precisely the same moment with random and unevenly dispersed fire and damage

they didnt

thats just another one of your moronic troofer lies

really then why did it not then topple over or have a partial collapse ?..how did it fall so quickly and evenly and completely then..

stop lying
the mechanical penthouse went first, and your only using ONE VIEW top make your claim
that is a LIE


and it DID topple over

 

[eots]

they didnt

thats just another one of your moronic troofer lies

really then why did it not then topple over or have a partial collapse ?..how did it fall so quickly and evenly and completely then..

stop lying
the mechanical penthouse went first, and your only using ONE VIEW top make your claim
that is a LIE


and it DID topple over

don't be a retard by fractions of a seconds the penthouse and central supports went first and the rest followed on a slightly leaning angle just like in a controlled demolition

 

[DiveCon]

really then why did it not then topple over or have a partial collapse ?..how did it fall so quickly and evenly and completely then..

stop lying
the mechanical penthouse went first, and your only using ONE VIEW top make your claim
that is a LIE


and it DID topple over

don't be a retard by fractions of a seconds the penthouse and central supports went first and the rest followed on a slightly leaning angle just like in a controlled demolition

wrong, in a controled demo it would have all gone at once and you would have heard LOUD explosions as the support beams were cut with shape charges

and as to your "retard" comment, you and your troofer buddies fit that far more than i do

 

[eots]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pH6JVXk7jpQ&NR=1]YouTube - 9/11 Explosions Heard Loud and Clear: WTC 7[/ame]

 

[DiveCon]

YouTube - 9/11 Explosions Heard Loud and Clear: WTC 7

you dumbass
those were NOT in connection with the collapse

 

[eots]

YouTube - 9/11 Explosions Heard Loud and Clear: WTC 7

you dumbass
those were NOT in connection with the collapse

and how would you know that