WTC building 7

[Hollie]

Hey Penny,I never heard back from you if you watched these four videos here of mine yet?

WTC building 7 Page 72 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

the trolls here wont listen to them and talk about the information and evidence in them,so would sure like to hear you discuss them since you DONT cover your ears and close your eyes each time they are shown. they wont listen to them so would like SOMEONE to comment on the facts discussed in them and comment on them.

WTC building 7 Page 72 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

thats what you end up doing when you discuss this with trolls,they evade the facts and wont watch your videos you post just engaging in childish name calling one liners,so i have no choice but to ask a fellow truther to discuss the information in them.lol

Why would anyone be persuaded by goofy conspiracy theories.

because no one can explain the free fall collapse of building 7 and over 2000 architects, engineers, have put there names and reputations on the line to publicly say WTC 7 was a controlled demolition
World Trade Center Building 7 Demolished on 9 11 - Home

There was no free fall collapse, except for the collapse of your goofy conspiracy theory.

 

[Hollie]

why would anyone care what caused the collapse of building 7? The people were all out------the air was already poisoned. I have heard 'stories' that it was demolished
as if were it demolished that would be a REALLY BIG DEAL Even I can think of reasons why it would be a good idea to put it down. People later died
of inhaling that poisoned air-------did anyone miss that fact?. If it contained fires---
that would be another good reason to put it down -----fires spread----the sky was
BLACK over manhattan. Can someone explain this giant issue to me?

you are getting repetitive...you can not explain the free fall collapse of building 7 is the issue

There was no free fall collapse.... except that of your silly conspiracy theories.

I do not see the issue even if the velocity of the fall did approach free fall

There is no question of free fall and simply what it means is all structure all resistance below had to be removed simultaneously something that can only be achieved with a well planed and timed demolition..NIST makes no attempt to explain the collapses or free fall as the computer model ends at initiation of collapse sequence

There's no question of free fall. The Jooooos are responsible for the thermite charges that started the building fires and the massive explosion.

 

[Hollie]

why would anyone care what caused the collapse of building 7? The people were all out------the air was already poisoned. I have heard 'stories' that it was demolished
as if were it demolished that would be a REALLY BIG DEAL Even I can think of reasons why it would be a good idea to put it down. People later died
of inhaling that poisoned air-------did anyone miss that fact?. If it contained fires---
that would be another good reason to put it down -----fires spread----the sky was
BLACK over manhattan. Can someone explain this giant issue to me?

you are getting repetitive...you can not explain the free fall collapse of building 7 is the issue

What free fall collapse?

 

[eots]

why would anyone care what caused the collapse of building 7? The people were all out------the air was already poisoned. I have heard 'stories' that it was demolished
as if were it demolished that would be a REALLY BIG DEAL Even I can think of reasons why it would be a good idea to put it down. People later died
of inhaling that poisoned air-------did anyone miss that fact?. If it contained fires---
that would be another good reason to put it down -----fires spread----the sky was
BLACK over manhattan. Can someone explain this giant issue to me?

you are getting repetitive...you can not explain the free fall collapse of building 7 is the issue

oh----the APPROXIMATED velocity of fall-----approachting free fall. SO?
maybe it was demolished via IMPLOSION SO?

So then NIST was a cover -up and the entire NIST investigation is in question and prior knowledge of the impending terror attacks and preplanning would of been required

 

[Hollie]

why would anyone care what caused the collapse of building 7? The people were all out------the air was already poisoned. I have heard 'stories' that it was demolished
as if were it demolished that would be a REALLY BIG DEAL Even I can think of reasons why it would be a good idea to put it down. People later died
of inhaling that poisoned air-------did anyone miss that fact?. If it contained fires---
that would be another good reason to put it down -----fires spread----the sky was
BLACK over manhattan. Can someone explain this giant issue to me?

you are getting repetitive...you can not explain the free fall collapse of building 7 is the issue

oh----the APPROXIMATED velocity of fall-----approachting free fall. SO?
maybe it was demolished via IMPLOSION SO?

So then NIST was a cover -up and the entire NIST investigation is in question and prior knowledge of the impending terror attacks and preplanning would of been required

NIST was controlled by the same Joooooos who planted the thermite charges in building 7.

 

[irosie91]

why would anyone care what caused the collapse of building 7? The people were all out------the air was already poisoned. I have heard 'stories' that it was demolished
as if were it demolished that would be a REALLY BIG DEAL Even I can think of reasons why it would be a good idea to put it down. People later died
of inhaling that poisoned air-------did anyone miss that fact?. If it contained fires---
that would be another good reason to put it down -----fires spread----the sky was
BLACK over manhattan. Can someone explain this giant issue to me?

you are getting repetitive...you can not explain the free fall collapse of building 7 is the issue

oh----the APPROXIMATED velocity of fall-----approachting free fall. SO?
maybe it was demolished via IMPLOSION SO?

So then NIST was a cover -up and the entire NIST investigation is in question and prior knowledge of the impending terror attacks and preplanning would of been required

nope-----seven stood for many many hours after one and two dropped. If they decided to do a controlled demo of that relatively little building----they probably
could have managed to do so------maybe there is some national security issue
in simply not revealing the circumstances of getting rid of seven

 

[irosie91]

why would anyone care what caused the collapse of building 7? The people were all out------the air was already poisoned. I have heard 'stories' that it was demolished
as if were it demolished that would be a REALLY BIG DEAL Even I can think of reasons why it would be a good idea to put it down. People later died
of inhaling that poisoned air-------did anyone miss that fact?. If it contained fires---
that would be another good reason to put it down -----fires spread----the sky was
BLACK over manhattan. Can someone explain this giant issue to me?

you are getting repetitive...you can not explain the free fall collapse of building 7 is the issue

oh----the APPROXIMATED velocity of fall-----approachting free fall. SO?
maybe it was demolished via IMPLOSION SO?

So then NIST was a cover -up and the entire NIST investigation is in question and prior knowledge of the impending terror attacks and preplanning would of been required

NIST was controlled by the same Joooooos who planted the thermite charges in building 7.

OOOH.... dem da ones who called in sick that morning

 

[eots]

why would anyone care what caused the collapse of building 7? The people were all out------the air was already poisoned. I have heard 'stories' that it was demolished
as if were it demolished that would be a REALLY BIG DEAL Even I can think of reasons why it would be a good idea to put it down. People later died
of inhaling that poisoned air-------did anyone miss that fact?. If it contained fires---
that would be another good reason to put it down -----fires spread----the sky was
BLACK over manhattan. Can someone explain this giant issue to me?

you are getting repetitive...you can not explain the free fall collapse of building 7 is the issue

There was no free fall collapse.... except that of your silly conspiracy theories.

I do not see the issue even if the velocity of the fall did approach free fall

There is no question of free fall and simply what it means is all structure all resistance below had to be removed simultaneously something that can only be achieved with a well planed and timed demolition..NIST makes no attempt to explain the collapses or free fall as the computer model ends at initiation of collapse sequence

There's no question of free fall. The Jooooos are responsible for the thermite charges that started the building fires and the massive explosion.

Israeli involvement could not occur without complicity with elements within our government
and jooos would be no more responsible for the 9'11 attacks than the average American

 

[Hollie]

why would anyone care what caused the collapse of building 7? The people were all out------the air was already poisoned. I have heard 'stories' that it was demolished
as if were it demolished that would be a REALLY BIG DEAL Even I can think of reasons why it would be a good idea to put it down. People later died
of inhaling that poisoned air-------did anyone miss that fact?. If it contained fires---
that would be another good reason to put it down -----fires spread----the sky was
BLACK over manhattan. Can someone explain this giant issue to me?

you are getting repetitive...you can not explain the free fall collapse of building 7 is the issue

oh----the APPROXIMATED velocity of fall-----approachting free fall. SO?
maybe it was demolished via IMPLOSION SO?

So then NIST was a cover -up and the entire NIST investigation is in question and prior knowledge of the impending terror attacks and preplanning would of been required

NIST was controlled by the same Joooooos who planted the thermite charges in building 7.

OOOH.... dem da ones who called in sick that morning

Yep. It was that series of phone calls among the few Jooooooo conspirators to alert the others of the planned attacks.

 

[eots]

why would anyone care what caused the collapse of building 7? The people were all out------the air was already poisoned. I have heard 'stories' that it was demolished
as if were it demolished that would be a REALLY BIG DEAL Even I can think of reasons why it would be a good idea to put it down. People later died
of inhaling that poisoned air-------did anyone miss that fact?. If it contained fires---
that would be another good reason to put it down -----fires spread----the sky was
BLACK over manhattan. Can someone explain this giant issue to me?

you are getting repetitive...you can not explain the free fall collapse of building 7 is the issue

oh----the APPROXIMATED velocity of fall-----approachting free fall. SO?
maybe it was demolished via IMPLOSION SO?

So then NIST was a cover -up and the entire NIST investigation is in question and prior knowledge of the impending terror attacks and preplanning would of been required

nope-----seven stood for many many hours after one and two dropped. If they decided to do a controlled demo of that relatively little building----they probably
could have managed to do so------maybe there is some national security issue
in simply not revealing the circumstances of getting rid of seven

a 47 seven story skyscraper is not a little building it would be the tallest building in many major cities and you scenario still makes all NIST findings invalid

 

[eots]

you are getting repetitive...you can not explain the free fall collapse of building 7 is the issue

oh----the APPROXIMATED velocity of fall-----approachting free fall. SO?
maybe it was demolished via IMPLOSION SO?

So then NIST was a cover -up and the entire NIST investigation is in question and prior knowledge of the impending terror attacks and preplanning would of been required

NIST was controlled by the same Joooooos who planted the thermite charges in building 7.

OOOH.... dem da ones who called in sick that morning

Yep. It was that series of phone calls among the few Jooooooo conspirators to alert the others of the planned attacks.

???

 

[Hollie]

you are getting repetitive...you can not explain the free fall collapse of building 7 is the issue

There was no free fall collapse.... except that of your silly conspiracy theories.

I do not see the issue even if the velocity of the fall did approach free fall

There is no question of free fall and simply what it means is all structure all resistance below had to be removed simultaneously something that can only be achieved with a well planed and timed demolition..NIST makes no attempt to explain the collapses or free fall as the computer model ends at initiation of collapse sequence

There's no question of free fall. The Jooooos are responsible for the thermite charges that started the building fires and the massive explosion.

Israeli involvement could not occur without complicity with elements within our government
and jooos would be no more responsible for the 9'11 attacks than the average American

Correct. The illuminati, Freemasons and a secret society of alternate reality Girl Scouts, all managed by the Joooooos, who were responsible.

 

[Hollie]

oh----the APPROXIMATED velocity of fall-----approachting free fall. SO?
maybe it was demolished via IMPLOSION SO?

So then NIST was a cover -up and the entire NIST investigation is in question and prior knowledge of the impending terror attacks and preplanning would of been required

NIST was controlled by the same Joooooos who planted the thermite charges in building 7.

OOOH.... dem da ones who called in sick that morning

Yep. It was that series of phone calls among the few Jooooooo conspirators to alert the others of the planned attacks.

???

Good answer.

Mums the word. If anyone asks, you weren't there and you never got the secret phone call.

What thermite?

 

[irosie91]

So then NIST was a cover -up and the entire NIST investigation is in question and prior knowledge of the impending terror attacks and preplanning would of been required

NIST was controlled by the same Joooooos who planted the thermite charges in building 7.

OOOH.... dem da ones who called in sick that morning

Yep. It was that series of phone calls among the few Jooooooo conspirators to alert the others of the planned attacks.

???

Good answer.

Mums the word. If anyone asks, you weren't there and you never got the secret phone call.

What thermite?

the secret code word that morning was "SHACHARIT" sssshhhhhhhhhh.....

 

[eots]

There was no free fall collapse.... except that of your silly conspiracy theories.

I do not see the issue even if the velocity of the fall did approach free fall

There is no question of free fall and simply what it means is all structure all resistance below had to be removed simultaneously something that can only be achieved with a well planed and timed demolition..NIST makes no attempt to explain the collapses or free fall as the computer model ends at initiation of collapse sequence

There's no question of free fall. The Jooooos are responsible for the thermite charges that started the building fires and the massive explosion.

Israeli involvement could not occur without complicity with elements within our government
and jooos would be no more responsible for the 9'11 attacks than the average American

Correct. The illuminati, Freemasons and a secret society of alternate reality Girl Scouts, all managed by the Joooooos, who were responsible.

how does this babble debwunk the controlled demoliton of building 7 ?

 

[eots]

Larry L. Erickson, BS Aeronautical Eng, MS Aeronautical Eng, PhD Eng Mechanics – Retired NASA Aerospace Engineer and Research Scientist. Conducted research in the fields of structural dynamics, aerodynamics, aeroelasticity and flutter. Recipient of NASA's Aerodynamics Division Researcher-of-the-Year Award. 33-year NASA career. Member, American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics. Instructor, Physics and Aerospace Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo 1998 - present. Author and co-author of several scientific papers on aerodynamic analysis. Contributing author to Applied Computational Aerodynamics (1990).

• Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition:
  "Serious technical investigations by experts seem to be lacking from the official explanations." http://www.ae911truth.org

Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11, signed by more than 1,500 Architects and Engineers:

 

[Hollie]

Larry L. Erickson, BS Aeronautical Eng, MS Aeronautical Eng, PhD Eng Mechanics – Retired NASA Aerospace Engineer and Research Scientist. Conducted research in the fields of structural dynamics, aerodynamics, aeroelasticity and flutter. Recipient of NASA's Aerodynamics Division Researcher-of-the-Year Award. 33-year NASA career. Member, American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics. Instructor, Physics and Aerospace Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo 1998 - present. Author and co-author of several scientific papers on aerodynamic analysis. Contributing author to Applied Computational Aerodynamics (1990).

• Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition:
  "Serious technical investigations by experts seem to be lacking from the official explanations." http://www.ae911truth.org

Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11, signed by more than 1,500 Architects and Engineers:

Notice how the Jooooooos are trying to trying to blame the Air Force (run by the Saudi monarchy) for 9/11.

Lt. Col. Robert Bowman, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) –
U.S. Air Force fighter pilot with over 100 combat missions. (PhD in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering, Cal Tech). Former Head of the Department of Aeronautical Engineering and Assistant Dean at the U.S. Air Force Institute of Technology. 22-year Air Force career. Also taught Mathematics and English at the University of Southern California, the University of Maryland, and Phillips University.

• Member: Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth Association Statement:"Scholars and professionals with various kinds of expertise---including architects, engineers, firefighters, intelligence officers, lawyers, medical professionals, military officers, philosophers, religious leaders, physical scientists, and pilots---have spoken out about radical discrepancies between the official account of the 9/11 attacks and what they, as independent researchers, have learned. They have established beyond any reasonable doubt that the official account of 9/11 is false and that, therefore, the official “investigations” have really been cover-up operations.
• Patriots Question 9 11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9 11 Commission Report

 

[eots]

Hey Penny,I never heard back from you if you watched these four videos here of mine yet?

WTC building 7 Page 72 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

the trolls here wont listen to them and talk about the information and evidence in them,so would sure like to hear you discuss them since you DONT cover your ears and close your eyes each time they are shown. they wont listen to them so would like SOMEONE to comment on the facts discussed in them and comment on them.

WTC building 7 Page 72 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

thats what you end up doing when you discuss this with trolls,they evade the facts and wont watch your videos you post just engaging in childish name calling one liners,so i have no choice but to ask a fellow truther to discuss the information in them.lol

Why would anyone be persuaded by goofy conspiracy theories.

because no one can explain the free fall collapse of building 7 and over 2000 architects, engineers, have put there names and reputations on the line to publicly say WTC 7 was a controlled demolition
World Trade Center Building 7 Demolished on 9 11 - Home

There was no free fall collapse, except for the collapse of your goofy conspiracy theory.

• Stage 1 (0 to 1.75 seconds): acceleration less than that of gravity (i.e., slower than free fall).
• Stage 2 (1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall)
• Stage 3 (4.0 to 5.4 seconds): decreased acceleration, again less than that of gravity
• Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation

 

[Hollie]

Hey Penny,I never heard back from you if you watched these four videos here of mine yet?

WTC building 7 Page 72 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

the trolls here wont listen to them and talk about the information and evidence in them,so would sure like to hear you discuss them since you DONT cover your ears and close your eyes each time they are shown. they wont listen to them so would like SOMEONE to comment on the facts discussed in them and comment on them.

WTC building 7 Page 72 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

thats what you end up doing when you discuss this with trolls,they evade the facts and wont watch your videos you post just engaging in childish name calling one liners,so i have no choice but to ask a fellow truther to discuss the information in them.lol

Why would anyone be persuaded by goofy conspiracy theories.

because no one can explain the free fall collapse of building 7 and over 2000 architects, engineers, have put there names and reputations on the line to publicly say WTC 7 was a controlled demolition
World Trade Center Building 7 Demolished on 9 11 - Home

There was no free fall collapse, except for the collapse of your goofy conspiracy theory.

• Stage 1 (0 to 1.75 seconds): acceleration less than that of gravity (i.e., slower than free fall).
• Stage 2 (1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall)
• Stage 3 (4.0 to 5.4 seconds): decreased acceleration, again less than that of gravity
• Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation

Notice how the Jooooooos are trying to trying to blame the Air Force (run by the Saudi monarchy) for 9/11.

Lt. Col. Robert Bowman, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) –
U.S. Air Force fighter pilot with over 100 combat missions. (PhD in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering, Cal Tech). Former Head of the Department of Aeronautical Engineering and Assistant Dean at the U.S. Air Force Institute of Technology. 22-year Air Force career. Also taught Mathematics and English at the University of Southern California, the University of Maryland, and Phillips University.

• Member: Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth Association Statement:"Scholars and professionals with various kinds of expertise---including architects, engineers, firefighters, intelligence officers, lawyers, medical professionals, military officers, philosophers, religious leaders, physical scientists, and pilots---have spoken out about radical discrepancies between the official account of the 9/11 attacks and what they, as independent researchers, have learned. They have established beyond any reasonable doubt that the official account of 9/11 is false and that, therefore, the official “investigations” have really been cover-up operations.
• Patriots Question 9 11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9 11 Commission Report

 

[eots]

Larry L. Erickson, BS Aeronautical Eng, MS Aeronautical Eng, PhD Eng Mechanics – Retired NASA Aerospace Engineer and Research Scientist. Conducted research in the fields of structural dynamics, aerodynamics, aeroelasticity and flutter. Recipient of NASA's Aerodynamics Division Researcher-of-the-Year Award. 33-year NASA career. Member, American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics. Instructor, Physics and Aerospace Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo 1998 - present. Author and co-author of several scientific papers on aerodynamic analysis. Contributing author to Applied Computational Aerodynamics (1990).

• Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition:
  "Serious technical investigations by experts seem to be lacking from the official explanations." http://www.ae911truth.org

Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11, signed by more than 1,500 Architects and Engineers:

Notice how the Jooooooos are trying to trying to blame the Air Force (run by the Saudi monarchy) for 9/11.

Lt. Col. Robert Bowman, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) –
U.S. Air Force fighter pilot with over 100 combat missions. (PhD in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering, Cal Tech). Former Head of the Department of Aeronautical Engineering and Assistant Dean at the U.S. Air Force Institute of Technology. 22-year Air Force career. Also taught Mathematics and English at the University of Southern California, the University of Maryland, and Phillips University.

• Member: Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth Association Statement:"Scholars and professionals with various kinds of expertise---including architects, engineers, firefighters, intelligence officers, lawyers, medical professionals, military officers, philosophers, religious leaders, physical scientists, and pilots---have spoken out about radical discrepancies between the official account of the 9/11 attacks and what they, as independent researchers, have learned. They have established beyond any reasonable doubt that the official account of 9/11 is false and that, therefore, the official “investigations” have really been cover-up operations.
• Patriots Question 9 11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9 11 Commission Report

that would of been the 9/11 commission not the jooos crazy lady