Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
really since 911 have there been any aircraft strikes on high rises ? any that were damaged by other collapsing high rises.liar...nextonly because the same condition are not present....next!funny thing is there was molten metal and fire would not weaken a concrete a steel hi -rise to the point of collapse never has before 9/`11 or afterView attachment 40559funny thing about it is it's a red herring.But if all you want is to see steel melt, any old blowtorch will do the job. The metal at the end of the process will be useless for pretty much any technical purposes, though.
there is something called "metal fatigue" <<< so poetic. Hubby depends on a STEEL BRACE-----that itself depends on a nice solid steel ---really strong---well made SWISS craftsmanship-----screw------it happens----now and then-----
the screw breaks and he is on the floor BANG!!!!!!. <<<< all simply because a 150lb male walks on this brace. (he does not even play soccer anymore)
Somehow the CT nuts imagine they are going to convince me that a plane crash
onto a steel frame building-----a fire burning for more than an hour thruout and stuff falling all over the place is not going to bother a few steel beams?
the steel beams did not need to melt and did not .
all that was required was for them to be weakened and to bend shifting the load and gravity did the rest.
the amount of melted "metal" is so small it's inconsequential.
why do you say that when NIST says fire not damage brought done the wtc7..who is it you are trying to deceivereally since 911 have there been any aircraft strikes on high rises ? any that were damaged by other collapsing high rises.liar...nextonly because the same condition are not present....next!funny thing is there was molten metal and fire would not weaken a concrete a steel hi -rise to the point of collapse never has before 9/`11 or afterView attachment 40559funny thing about it is it's a red herring.there is something called "metal fatigue" <<< so poetic. Hubby depends on a STEEL BRACE-----that itself depends on a nice solid steel ---really strong---well made SWISS craftsmanship-----screw------it happens----now and then-----
the screw breaks and he is on the floor BANG!!!!!!. <<<< all simply because a 150lb male walks on this brace. (he does not even play soccer anymore)
Somehow the CT nuts imagine they are going to convince me that a plane crash
onto a steel frame building-----a fire burning for more than an hour thruout and stuff falling all over the place is not going to bother a few steel beams?
the steel beams did not need to melt and did not .
all that was required was for them to be weakened and to bend shifting the load and gravity did the rest.
the amount of melted "metal" is so small it's inconsequential.
any long burning fires that were not fought for long because of no water?
the answer is no so the conditions are not present and you tripped over your dick again.
no plane wtc 7 dumbassso people can just blow up a 47 floor skyscraper on 9/11 and no one should care ?..the real question is why are you and cronies still talking about it..so why are youa plane did not but wtc 1 did.I certainly BELIEVE that------ a plane crashed into the damn thing-----the event provided a few hundred reasons for fires to start up in a big building with all kinds
of machinery around, and electrical connections and------of course some chick with nail polish remover in her purse ........well ---anyway ----lots of reasons ----OH----the SEVEN building!!!!!!!!!-----that had all kinds of stuff FALL on it-----same thing
right are we still talking about that building? As far as I recall there was
no one in it when it went down
what makes you think "people BLEW IT UP? " I did not see the first plane hit---
but I saw the second----------the people controlling those planes were, clearly,
VERY MOTIVATED and the people celebrating the event (on Atlantic Avenue, Brooklyn) were very delighted with the event and the motivation of the people who controlled the planes
why do you say that when NIST says fire not damage brought done the wtc7..who is it you are trying to deceivereally since 911 have there been any aircraft strikes on high rises ? any that were damaged by other collapsing high rises.
any long burning fires that were not fought for long because of no water?
the answer is no so the conditions are not present and you tripped over your dick again.
"really since 911 have there been any aircraft strikes on high rises ? any that were damagedwhy do you say that when NIST says fire not damage brought done the wtc7..who is it you are trying to deceivereally since 911 have there been any aircraft strikes on high rises ? any that were damaged by other collapsing high rises.
any long burning fires that were not fought for long because of no water?
the answer is no so the conditions are not present and you tripped over your dick again.
I just read Daw's post. Nowhere does he claim that the damage from falling buildings brought down WTC7. It did, however, cause the fires that did bring down WTC7.
So who is it you are trying to deceive?
What big explosion occurred at wtc 7 according to NIST ?no plane wtc 7 dumbassso people can just blow up a 47 floor skyscraper on 9/11 and no one should care ?..the real question is why are you and cronies still talking about it..so why are youa plane did not but wtc 1 did.
right are we still talking about that building? As far as I recall there was
no one in it when it went down
what makes you think "people BLEW IT UP? " I did not see the first plane hit---
but I saw the second----------the people controlling those planes were, clearly,
VERY MOTIVATED and the people celebrating the event (on Atlantic Avenue, Brooklyn) were very delighted with the event and the motivation of the people who controlled the planes
right ---no plane-----big fire and big explosion as WTC 1 and 2 collapsed MORON
What big explosion occurred at wtc 7 according to NIST ?no plane wtc 7 dumbassso people can just blow up a 47 floor skyscraper on 9/11 and no one should care ?..the real question is why are you and cronies still talking about it..so why are youright are we still talking about that building? As far as I recall there was
no one in it when it went down
what makes you think "people BLEW IT UP? " I did not see the first plane hit---
but I saw the second----------the people controlling those planes were, clearly,
VERY MOTIVATED and the people celebrating the event (on Atlantic Avenue, Brooklyn) were very delighted with the event and the motivation of the people who controlled the planes
right ---no plane-----big fire and big explosion as WTC 1 and 2 collapsed MORON
What big explosion occurred at wtc 7 according to NIST ?no plane wtc 7 dumbassso people can just blow up a 47 floor skyscraper on 9/11 and no one should care ?..the real question is why are you and cronies still talking about it..so why are youright are we still talking about that building? As far as I recall there was
no one in it when it went down
what makes you think "people BLEW IT UP? " I did not see the first plane hit---
but I saw the second----------the people controlling those planes were, clearly,
VERY MOTIVATED and the people celebrating the event (on Atlantic Avenue, Brooklyn) were very delighted with the event and the motivation of the people who controlled the planes
right ---no plane-----big fire and big explosion as WTC 1 and 2 collapsed MORON
Newton s laws of motion A simple introductionWhat big explosion occurred at wtc 7 according to NIST ?no plane wtc 7 dumbassso people can just blow up a 47 floor skyscraper on 9/11 and no one should care ?..the real question is why are you and cronies still talking about it..so why are you
what makes you think "people BLEW IT UP? " I did not see the first plane hit---
but I saw the second----------the people controlling those planes were, clearly,
VERY MOTIVATED and the people celebrating the event (on Atlantic Avenue, Brooklyn) were very delighted with the event and the motivation of the people who controlled the planes
right ---no plane-----big fire and big explosion as WTC 1 and 2 collapsed MORON
the explosion -----ie BIG TIME ENERGY release----was the collapses of building one and two ------the shock wave w
What big explosion occurred at wtc 7 according to NIST ?no plane wtc 7 dumbassso people can just blow up a 47 floor skyscraper on 9/11 and no one should care ?..the real question is why are you and cronies still talking about it..so why are you
what makes you think "people BLEW IT UP? " I did not see the first plane hit---
but I saw the second----------the people controlling those planes were, clearly,
VERY MOTIVATED and the people celebrating the event (on Atlantic Avenue, Brooklyn) were very delighted with the event and the motivation of the people who controlled the planes
right ---no plane-----big fire and big explosion as WTC 1 and 2 collapsed MORON
the big time explosion ---huge release of energy was the collapses of buildings one and two------cast debris all over Manhattan Other buildings in the area were also damaged----an historic church----had to be rebuilt
Newton s laws of motion A simple introductionWhat big explosion occurred at wtc 7 according to NIST ?no plane wtc 7 dumbasswhat makes you think "people BLEW IT UP? " I did not see the first plane hit---
but I saw the second----------the people controlling those planes were, clearly,
VERY MOTIVATED and the people celebrating the event (on Atlantic Avenue, Brooklyn) were very delighted with the event and the motivation of the people who controlled the planes
right ---no plane-----big fire and big explosion as WTC 1 and 2 collapsed MORON
the explosion -----ie BIG TIME ENERGY release----was the collapses of building one and two ------the shock wave w
What big explosion occurred at wtc 7 according to NIST ?no plane wtc 7 dumbasswhat makes you think "people BLEW IT UP? " I did not see the first plane hit---
but I saw the second----------the people controlling those planes were, clearly,
VERY MOTIVATED and the people celebrating the event (on Atlantic Avenue, Brooklyn) were very delighted with the event and the motivation of the people who controlled the planes
right ---no plane-----big fire and big explosion as WTC 1 and 2 collapsed MORON
the big time explosion ---huge release of energy was the collapses of buildings one and two------cast debris all over Manhattan Other buildings in the area were also damaged----an historic church----had to be rebuilt
do try and keep up agent rosie troll.Like all shills,you ran away with your tail between your legs from my four videos. like clockwork,you agents are so predictable.lolno plane wtc 7 dumbassso people can just blow up a 47 floor skyscraper on 9/11 and no one should care ?..the real question is why are you and cronies still talking about it..so why are youa plane did not but wtc 1 did.I certainly BELIEVE that------ a plane crashed into the damn thing-----the event provided a few hundred reasons for fires to start up in a big building with all kinds
of machinery around, and electrical connections and------of course some chick with nail polish remover in her purse ........well ---anyway ----lots of reasons ----OH----the SEVEN building!!!!!!!!!-----that had all kinds of stuff FALL on it-----same thing
right are we still talking about that building? As far as I recall there was
no one in it when it went down
what makes you think "people BLEW IT UP? " I did not see the first plane hit---
but I saw the second----------the people controlling those planes were, clearly,
VERY MOTIVATED and the people celebrating the event (on Atlantic Avenue, Brooklyn) were very delighted with the event and the motivation of the people who controlled the planes
if there was one but there was not...next!the use of an Incendiary
Nor was there molten steel.
Same old silly YouTubes. Anyone can say anything and upload a video but none of the "witnesses" you quote tested the material ... NONE. Yet no matter how many times that truth is revealed, you continue to post your silliness.
You don't even listen to them.
do try and keep up agent rosie troll.Like all shills,you ran away with your tail between your legs from my four videos. like clockwork,you agents are so predictable.lolno plane wtc 7 dumbassso people can just blow up a 47 floor skyscraper on 9/11 and no one should care ?..the real question is why are you and cronies still talking about it..so why are youa plane did not but wtc 1 did.
right are we still talking about that building? As far as I recall there was
no one in it when it went down
what makes you think "people BLEW IT UP? " I did not see the first plane hit---
but I saw the second----------the people controlling those planes were, clearly,
VERY MOTIVATED and the people celebrating the event (on Atlantic Avenue, Brooklyn) were very delighted with the event and the motivation of the people who controlled the planes
Well your potty mouth makes up for it. On the bottom of most videos is a closed caption, CC and you can read it, although most of the time the spelling if off, but usually one can keep understand what is being said.do try and keep up agent rosie troll.Like all shills,you ran away with your tail between your legs from my four videos. like clockwork,you agents are so predictable.lolno plane wtc 7 dumbassso people can just blow up a 47 floor skyscraper on 9/11 and no one should care ?..the real question is why are you and cronies still talking about it..so why are youright are we still talking about that building? As far as I recall there was
no one in it when it went down
what makes you think "people BLEW IT UP? " I did not see the first plane hit---
but I saw the second----------the people controlling those planes were, clearly,
VERY MOTIVATED and the people celebrating the event (on Atlantic Avenue, Brooklyn) were very delighted with the event and the motivation of the people who controlled the planes
I don't do videos because I have no speakers. cocksucker
you can buy speakers for 10 bucks..Well your potty mouth makes up for it. On the bottom of most videos is a closed caption, CC and you can read it, although most of the time the spelling if off, but usually one can keep understand what is being said.do try and keep up agent rosie troll.Like all shills,you ran away with your tail between your legs from my four videos. like clockwork,you agents are so predictable.lolno plane wtc 7 dumbassso people can just blow up a 47 floor skyscraper on 9/11 and no one should care ?..the real question is why are you and cronies still talking about it..so why are you
what makes you think "people BLEW IT UP? " I did not see the first plane hit---
but I saw the second----------the people controlling those planes were, clearly,
VERY MOTIVATED and the people celebrating the event (on Atlantic Avenue, Brooklyn) were very delighted with the event and the motivation of the people who controlled the planes
I don't do videos because I have no speakers. cocksucker
Well your potty mouth makes up for it. On the bottom of most videos is a closed caption, CC and you can read it, although most of the time the spelling if off, but usually one can keep understand what is being said.do try and keep up agent rosie troll.Like all shills,you ran away with your tail between your legs from my four videos. like clockwork,you agents are so predictable.lolno plane wtc 7 dumbassso people can just blow up a 47 floor skyscraper on 9/11 and no one should care ?..the real question is why are you and cronies still talking about it..so why are you
what makes you think "people BLEW IT UP? " I did not see the first plane hit---
but I saw the second----------the people controlling those planes were, clearly,
VERY MOTIVATED and the people celebrating the event (on Atlantic Avenue, Brooklyn) were very delighted with the event and the motivation of the people who controlled the planes
I don't do videos because I have no speakers. cocksucker
thanks for proving theory correct... conspiracy believers can't distinguish fact from fiction ...hey new guy, eot's will never give you an honest answer...And you think that this giant army of many different agencies paying people troll hasn't been generally noticed why? None of them have spoken up about being paid to troll and derail discussions about 9/11 why?
That... does not answer my question. So you are claiming that massive groups in every major three letter agency are doing this? Do you realize how many middle managers would have to know?
"Hey Bob, I get why we need to have our people say that ISIS is a bunch of poopy heads, and that the dollar is more stable as a currency than it really is, but why are we being told to troll and disrupt any attempt at a discussion about 9/11?" You don't think that wouldn't raise more questions than it it would squish?
And I suppose that you think you do?
If so, that's laughable since YOU have NEVER posted anything honest or factual about 9/11, you dumbfuck!
