Yes, illegal aliens have constitutional rights

[Lakhota]

Subject to court review - and maybe even input from Congress.

Enumerated powers under the Constitution are NOT SUBJECT TO REVIEW!

It's like you are arguing... quite literally... that the court can "review" a Declaration of War by Congress! It cannot! It has no Constitutional jurisdiction. Declaring wars is an enumerated power granted to Congress and only to Congress... NOT THE COURT!

Good heavens..... Boss is making a 100% accurate and logically sound argument, and you people things that's funny?

This is how stupid left-wingers are. In Left-wing land, if the courts ruled the constitution, unconstitutional, some idiot left-wingers would be celebrating the brilliance of the ruling.

I'm not going to lie...I'm thoroughly enjoying watching you own Lakhota with facts. She just makes stuff up as she goes so watching her get taken to school is amusing.

Yes, it's hilarious watching NaziCons respond to shit they made up.

 

[LeftofLeft]

These words, from Section One of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution rank along with the Constitution's Bill of Rights as — in these precincts — the most important in world and American history:

No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.​

The critics all claim that undocumented workers or immigrants or migrants — whichever label is the flavor of the day — don't have legal rights because they are lawbreakers by entering the country illegally and owe no loyalty to the United States. They claim that only U.S. citizens (natural born or naturalized) are protected by the Constitution. The critics are not only wrong — they are really, truly and sincerely wrong.

The U.S. Supreme Court settled the issue well over a century ago. But even before the court laid the issue to rest, a principal author of the Constitution, James Madison, the second president of the United States, wrote: "that as they [aliens], owe, on the one hand, a temporary obedience, they are entitled, in return, to their [constitutional] protection and advantage."

More recently, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Zadvydas v. Davis (2001) that "due process" of the 14th Amendment applies to all aliens in the United States whose presence maybe or is "unlawful, involuntary or transitory."

In summary, the entire case of illegal aliens being covered by and protected by the Constitution has been settled law for 129 years and rests on one word: "person." It is the word "person" that connects the dots of "due process" and "equal protection" in the 14th Amendment to the U.S Constitution and it is those five words that make the Constitution of the United States and its 14th amendment the most important political document since the Magna Carta in all world history.

"Aliens," legal and illegal, have the full panoply of constitutional protections American citizens have with three exceptions: voting, some government jobs and gun ownership (and that is now in doubt) — Glenn Beck and others notwithstanding.

More w/Supporting Cases: Yes, illegal aliens have constitutional rights

That should be clear enough for everyone to understand.

Then please explain why this didn't apply to Native Americans?

It wasn't until 1924 they were even recognized as citizens.
It wasn't until 1935 their religious freedom was protected.
Other basic civil rights didn't come until 1968. (100 years after ratification of the 14th)

So now you are claiming the Constitution and 14th applies to illegal aliens who have no legal right to be in the country but it did not apply to indigenous people who were here before we came.

And you wonder why people think you're a moron?

What about blacks and women?

Well, since you asked, under several African edicts, Blacks still have the rights to sell other Blacks. Under Sharia, Women have the right to get the shit beaten out of them for driving a car or going to school. What about homosexual rights?

 

[Lakhota]

These words, from Section One of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution rank along with the Constitution's Bill of Rights as — in these precincts — the most important in world and American history:

No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.​

The critics all claim that undocumented workers or immigrants or migrants — whichever label is the flavor of the day — don't have legal rights because they are lawbreakers by entering the country illegally and owe no loyalty to the United States. They claim that only U.S. citizens (natural born or naturalized) are protected by the Constitution. The critics are not only wrong — they are really, truly and sincerely wrong.

The U.S. Supreme Court settled the issue well over a century ago. But even before the court laid the issue to rest, a principal author of the Constitution, James Madison, the second president of the United States, wrote: "that as they [aliens], owe, on the one hand, a temporary obedience, they are entitled, in return, to their [constitutional] protection and advantage."

More recently, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Zadvydas v. Davis (2001) that "due process" of the 14th Amendment applies to all aliens in the United States whose presence maybe or is "unlawful, involuntary or transitory."

In summary, the entire case of illegal aliens being covered by and protected by the Constitution has been settled law for 129 years and rests on one word: "person." It is the word "person" that connects the dots of "due process" and "equal protection" in the 14th Amendment to the U.S Constitution and it is those five words that make the Constitution of the United States and its 14th amendment the most important political document since the Magna Carta in all world history.

"Aliens," legal and illegal, have the full panoply of constitutional protections American citizens have with three exceptions: voting, some government jobs and gun ownership (and that is now in doubt) — Glenn Beck and others notwithstanding.

More w/Supporting Cases: Yes, illegal aliens have constitutional rights

That should be clear enough for everyone to understand.

Then please explain why this didn't apply to Native Americans?

It wasn't until 1924 they were even recognized as citizens.
It wasn't until 1935 their religious freedom was protected.
Other basic civil rights didn't come until 1968. (100 years after ratification of the 14th)

So now you are claiming the Constitution and 14th applies to illegal aliens who have no legal right to be in the country but it did not apply to indigenous people who were here before we came.

And you wonder why people think you're a moron?

What about blacks and women?

Well, since you asked, under several African edicts, Blacks still have the rights to sell other Blacks. Under Sharia, Women have the right to get the shit beaten out of them for driving a car or going to school. What about homosexual rights?

Oh, are we now living in Africa or some other foreign country? Damn, I can't keep up...

 

[WillowTree]

These words, from Section One of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution rank along with the Constitution's Bill of Rights as — in these precincts — the most important in world and American history:

No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.​

The critics all claim that undocumented workers or immigrants or migrants — whichever label is the flavor of the day — don't have legal rights because they are lawbreakers by entering the country illegally and owe no loyalty to the United States. They claim that only U.S. citizens (natural born or naturalized) are protected by the Constitution. The critics are not only wrong — they are really, truly and sincerely wrong.

The U.S. Supreme Court settled the issue well over a century ago. But even before the court laid the issue to rest, a principal author of the Constitution, James Madison, the second president of the United States, wrote: "that as they [aliens], owe, on the one hand, a temporary obedience, they are entitled, in return, to their [constitutional] protection and advantage."

More recently, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Zadvydas v. Davis (2001) that "due process" of the 14th Amendment applies to all aliens in the United States whose presence maybe or is "unlawful, involuntary or transitory."

In summary, the entire case of illegal aliens being covered by and protected by the Constitution has been settled law for 129 years and rests on one word: "person." It is the word "person" that connects the dots of "due process" and "equal protection" in the 14th Amendment to the U.S Constitution and it is those five words that make the Constitution of the United States and its 14th amendment the most important political document since the Magna Carta in all world history.

"Aliens," legal and illegal, have the full panoply of constitutional protections American citizens have with three exceptions: voting, some government jobs and gun ownership (and that is now in doubt) — Glenn Beck and others notwithstanding.

More w/Supporting Cases: Yes, illegal aliens have constitutional rights

That should be clear enough for everyone to understand.

They have the right to be deported.

 

[P@triot]

Damn, I can't keep up...

Yes...we are well aware of that dear. We've been saying that for years.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Subject to court review - and maybe even input from Congress.

Enumerated powers under the Constitution are NOT SUBJECT TO REVIEW!

It's like you are arguing... quite literally... that the court can "review" a Declaration of War by Congress! It cannot! It has no Constitutional jurisdiction. Declaring wars is an enumerated power granted to Congress and only to Congress... NOT THE COURT!

Good heavens..... Boss is making a 100% accurate and logically sound argument, and you people things that's funny?

This is how stupid left-wingers are. In Left-wing land, if the courts ruled the constitution, unconstitutional, some idiot left-wingers would be celebrating the brilliance of the ruling.

I'm not going to lie...I'm thoroughly enjoying watching you own Lakhota with facts. She just makes stuff up as she goes so watching her get taken to school is amusing.

Yes, it's hilarious watching NaziCons respond to shit they made up.

Like what? The 9th didn't really rule the 2nd Amendment unconstitutional?

 

[P@triot]

This is the dumbest thread ever and even Laky doesn't believe it. All she's attempting to do is generate support for a false narrative. She's hoping some young, impressionable soul will read this, buy into it, and start spreading the lie as well.

The only people in the world who have constitutional rights are U.S. citizens on U.S. soil. A U.S. citizen on foreign soil has no constitutional rights and a foreigner on U.S. soil has no constitutional rights. It is not an international document.

 

[Rustic]

These words, from Section One of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution rank along with the Constitution's Bill of Rights as — in these precincts — the most important in world and American history:

No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.​

The critics all claim that undocumented workers or immigrants or migrants — whichever label is the flavor of the day — don't have legal rights because they are lawbreakers by entering the country illegally and owe no loyalty to the United States. They claim that only U.S. citizens (natural born or naturalized) are protected by the Constitution. The critics are not only wrong — they are really, truly and sincerely wrong.

The U.S. Supreme Court settled the issue well over a century ago. But even before the court laid the issue to rest, a principal author of the Constitution, James Madison, the second president of the United States, wrote: "that as they [aliens], owe, on the one hand, a temporary obedience, they are entitled, in return, to their [constitutional] protection and advantage."

More recently, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Zadvydas v. Davis (2001) that "due process" of the 14th Amendment applies to all aliens in the United States whose presence maybe or is "unlawful, involuntary or transitory."

In summary, the entire case of illegal aliens being covered by and protected by the Constitution has been settled law for 129 years and rests on one word: "person." It is the word "person" that connects the dots of "due process" and "equal protection" in the 14th Amendment to the U.S Constitution and it is those five words that make the Constitution of the United States and its 14th amendment the most important political document since the Magna Carta in all world history.

"Aliens," legal and illegal, have the full panoply of constitutional protections American citizens have with three exceptions: voting, some government jobs and gun ownership (and that is now in doubt) — Glenn Beck and others notwithstanding.

More w/Supporting Cases: Yes, illegal aliens have constitutional rights

That should be clear enough for everyone to understand.

Washington Redskin, stay out of the firewater you fucking drunk Indian. You have no reading comprehension.

 

[LeftofLeft]

These words, from Section One of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution rank along with the Constitution's Bill of Rights as — in these precincts — the most important in world and American history:

No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.​

The critics all claim that undocumented workers or immigrants or migrants — whichever label is the flavor of the day — don't have legal rights because they are lawbreakers by entering the country illegally and owe no loyalty to the United States. They claim that only U.S. citizens (natural born or naturalized) are protected by the Constitution. The critics are not only wrong — they are really, truly and sincerely wrong.

The U.S. Supreme Court settled the issue well over a century ago. But even before the court laid the issue to rest, a principal author of the Constitution, James Madison, the second president of the United States, wrote: "that as they [aliens], owe, on the one hand, a temporary obedience, they are entitled, in return, to their [constitutional] protection and advantage."

More recently, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Zadvydas v. Davis (2001) that "due process" of the 14th Amendment applies to all aliens in the United States whose presence maybe or is "unlawful, involuntary or transitory."

In summary, the entire case of illegal aliens being covered by and protected by the Constitution has been settled law for 129 years and rests on one word: "person." It is the word "person" that connects the dots of "due process" and "equal protection" in the 14th Amendment to the U.S Constitution and it is those five words that make the Constitution of the United States and its 14th amendment the most important political document since the Magna Carta in all world history.

"Aliens," legal and illegal, have the full panoply of constitutional protections American citizens have with three exceptions: voting, some government jobs and gun ownership (and that is now in doubt) — Glenn Beck and others notwithstanding.

More w/Supporting Cases: Yes, illegal aliens have constitutional rights

That should be clear enough for everyone to understand.

Then please explain why this didn't apply to Native Americans?

It wasn't until 1924 they were even recognized as citizens.
It wasn't until 1935 their religious freedom was protected.
Other basic civil rights didn't come until 1968. (100 years after ratification of the 14th)

So now you are claiming the Constitution and 14th applies to illegal aliens who have no legal right to be in the country but it did not apply to indigenous people who were here before we came.

And you wonder why people think you're a moron?

What about blacks and women?

Well, since you asked, under several African edicts, Blacks still have the rights to sell other Blacks. Under Sharia, Women have the right to get the shit beaten out of them for driving a car or going to school. What about homosexual rights?

Oh, are we now living in Africa or some other foreign country? Damn, I can't keep up...

You never could keep up.

 

[LeftofLeft]

These words, from Section One of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution rank along with the Constitution's Bill of Rights as — in these precincts — the most important in world and American history:

No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.​

The critics all claim that undocumented workers or immigrants or migrants — whichever label is the flavor of the day — don't have legal rights because they are lawbreakers by entering the country illegally and owe no loyalty to the United States. They claim that only U.S. citizens (natural born or naturalized) are protected by the Constitution. The critics are not only wrong — they are really, truly and sincerely wrong.

The U.S. Supreme Court settled the issue well over a century ago. But even before the court laid the issue to rest, a principal author of the Constitution, James Madison, the second president of the United States, wrote: "that as they [aliens], owe, on the one hand, a temporary obedience, they are entitled, in return, to their [constitutional] protection and advantage."

More recently, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Zadvydas v. Davis (2001) that "due process" of the 14th Amendment applies to all aliens in the United States whose presence maybe or is "unlawful, involuntary or transitory."

In summary, the entire case of illegal aliens being covered by and protected by the Constitution has been settled law for 129 years and rests on one word: "person." It is the word "person" that connects the dots of "due process" and "equal protection" in the 14th Amendment to the U.S Constitution and it is those five words that make the Constitution of the United States and its 14th amendment the most important political document since the Magna Carta in all world history.

"Aliens," legal and illegal, have the full panoply of constitutional protections American citizens have with three exceptions: voting, some government jobs and gun ownership (and that is now in doubt) — Glenn Beck and others notwithstanding.

More w/Supporting Cases: Yes, illegal aliens have constitutional rights

That should be clear enough for everyone to understand.

Then please explain why this didn't apply to Native Americans?

It wasn't until 1924 they were even recognized as citizens.
It wasn't until 1935 their religious freedom was protected.
Other basic civil rights didn't come until 1968. (100 years after ratification of the 14th)

So now you are claiming the Constitution and 14th applies to illegal aliens who have no legal right to be in the country but it did not apply to indigenous people who were here before we came.

And you wonder why people think you're a moron?

What about blacks and women?

Well, since you asked, under several African edicts, Blacks still have the rights to sell other Blacks. Under Sharia, Women have the right to get the shit beaten out of them for driving a car or going to school. What about homosexual rights?

Oh, are we now living in Africa or some other foreign country? Damn, I can't keep up...

You just made your own case for Blacks and Women......here.

 

[Wyatt earp]

This is the dumbest thread ever and even Laky doesn't believe it. All she's attempting to do is generate support for a false narrative. She's hoping some young, impressionable soul will read this, buy into it, and start spreading the lie as well.

The only people in the world who have constitutional rights are U.S. citizens on U.S. soil. A U.S. citizen on foreign soil has no constitutional rights and a foreigner on U.S. soil has no constitutional rights. It is not an international document.

Yup that's what Chief bullshit and rderp always do, same ol bullshit hoping it catches on.



.

 

[Lakhota]

These words, from Section One of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution rank along with the Constitution's Bill of Rights as — in these precincts — the most important in world and American history:

No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.​

The critics all claim that undocumented workers or immigrants or migrants — whichever label is the flavor of the day — don't have legal rights because they are lawbreakers by entering the country illegally and owe no loyalty to the United States. They claim that only U.S. citizens (natural born or naturalized) are protected by the Constitution. The critics are not only wrong — they are really, truly and sincerely wrong.

The U.S. Supreme Court settled the issue well over a century ago. But even before the court laid the issue to rest, a principal author of the Constitution, James Madison, the second president of the United States, wrote: "that as they [aliens], owe, on the one hand, a temporary obedience, they are entitled, in return, to their [constitutional] protection and advantage."

More recently, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Zadvydas v. Davis (2001) that "due process" of the 14th Amendment applies to all aliens in the United States whose presence maybe or is "unlawful, involuntary or transitory."

In summary, the entire case of illegal aliens being covered by and protected by the Constitution has been settled law for 129 years and rests on one word: "person." It is the word "person" that connects the dots of "due process" and "equal protection" in the 14th Amendment to the U.S Constitution and it is those five words that make the Constitution of the United States and its 14th amendment the most important political document since the Magna Carta in all world history.

"Aliens," legal and illegal, have the full panoply of constitutional protections American citizens have with three exceptions: voting, some government jobs and gun ownership (and that is now in doubt) — Glenn Beck and others notwithstanding.

More w/Supporting Cases: Yes, illegal aliens have constitutional rights

That should be clear enough for everyone to understand.

Then please explain why this didn't apply to Native Americans?

It wasn't until 1924 they were even recognized as citizens.
It wasn't until 1935 their religious freedom was protected.
Other basic civil rights didn't come until 1968. (100 years after ratification of the 14th)

So now you are claiming the Constitution and 14th applies to illegal aliens who have no legal right to be in the country but it did not apply to indigenous people who were here before we came.

And you wonder why people think you're a moron?

What about blacks and women?

Well, since you asked, under several African edicts, Blacks still have the rights to sell other Blacks. Under Sharia, Women have the right to get the shit beaten out of them for driving a car or going to school. What about homosexual rights?

Oh, are we now living in Africa or some other foreign country? Damn, I can't keep up...

You just made your own case for Blacks and Women......here.

By here - do you mean that blacks and women didn't have FULL constitutional rights when the Constitution was ratified?

 

[jillian]

Nothing is ever settled.

Everything like this challenged time and time again.

Look at the terrible Citizens United.

actually that is pretty settled law. you can't divest people of their due process and you can't discriminate based on religion.

great country america. pity you scum want to reshape it into a white christian supremacist haven.

 

[Rustic]

Nothing is ever settled.

Everything like this challenged time and time again.

Look at the terrible Citizens United.

actually that is pretty settled law. you can't divest people of their due process and you can't discriminate based on religion.

great country america. pity you scum want to reshape it into a white christian supremacist haven.

...

 

[Andylusion]

Nothing is ever settled.

Everything like this challenged time and time again.

Look at the terrible Citizens United.

actually that is pretty settled law. you can't divest people of their due process and you can't discriminate based on religion.

great country america. pity you scum want to reshape it into a white christian supremacist haven.

You have the right to be wrong. By all means continue.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Then please explain why this didn't apply to Native Americans?

It wasn't until 1924 they were even recognized as citizens.
It wasn't until 1935 their religious freedom was protected.
Other basic civil rights didn't come until 1968. (100 years after ratification of the 14th)

So now you are claiming the Constitution and 14th applies to illegal aliens who have no legal right to be in the country but it did not apply to indigenous people who were here before we came.

And you wonder why people think you're a moron?

What about blacks and women?

Well, since you asked, under several African edicts, Blacks still have the rights to sell other Blacks. Under Sharia, Women have the right to get the shit beaten out of them for driving a car or going to school. What about homosexual rights?

Oh, are we now living in Africa or some other foreign country? Damn, I can't keep up...

You just made your own case for Blacks and Women......here.

By here - do you mean that blacks and women didn't have FULL constitutional rights when the Constitution was ratified?

US changed that. Why are you adhering to the past? While you are there, how come you are not asking Africa and Muslim countries as to why they have not evolved when it comes to rights? Come on Lakhota, are you not concerned about Blacks and Women worldwide or who simple most concerned with your narrative?

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Nothing is ever settled.

Everything like this challenged time and time again.

Look at the terrible Citizens United.

actually that is pretty settled law. you can't divest people of their due process and you can't discriminate based on religion.

great country america. pity you scum want to reshape it into a white christian supremacist haven.

It wasn't originally settled...ever hear of the Slaughter House Cases ?

It really became "settled" when Roosevelts hand picked morons introduced the concept of selective incorporation.

Love how people who think different from you are "scum".........a true left-winger.

 

[12icer]

You apparently have no idea what the 14th says. it refers to the State laws of this country. It states vey specifically that a state can't make a law that OVERRIDES the constitutional rights of a citizen of this country.

 

[12icer]

It wasn't originally settled...ever hear of the Slaughter House Cases ?

It really became "settled" when Roosevelts hand picked morons introduced the concept of selective incorporation.

Love how people who think different from you are "scum".........a true left-winger.

And a left winger with the same old shit labels intimidation lies and talking points from the indoctrination center.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

It wasn't originally settled...ever hear of the Slaughter House Cases ?

It really became "settled" when Roosevelts hand picked morons introduced the concept of selective incorporation.

Love how people who think different from you are "scum".........a true left-winger.

And a left winger with the same old shit labels intimidation lies and talking points from the indoctrination center.

Watching them continually flush themselves down the toilet never really gets boring.