Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Those are 2 of the DUMBEST videos I've ever seen.
1. Dinner Scene - so all the 100% correct things the cop said about unqualified Blacks getting hired ahead of qualified Whites, and putting his life possibly in danger, is supposed to be wiped out, because he used the N word, right ? WRONG. With or without the N word, what he said about AA was right.
2. Curb Kill Scene - There you go. Portray white people as some hateful, Nazi, criminal killers who look like the image of the devil. You slipped up though. The cops who busted him were also White. Shouldn't they have been replaced by Black guys ? - using AA (in your racist mindset that is)
I have no doubt that you missed the point. It's why you think the way you do in 2015. You actually made my point.
The movie American History X shows us how we are taught racism, sometimes from a very young age. The kicker and not so happy ending shows us the results of acting this way since we learned our mistakes too late.
Not a failure. It was pointing out that speaking vaguely doesn't make good discussion in a computer forum. It was pointing out that too much form, can result in obsuring content. Substance is more important than style. Get it ?Sorry. We speak ENGLISH in here.of course. we don't need affirmative action if we can rely on the moral absolutism of the rule of law.
I'm sure you thought you were "winning" when you posted this but It's clearly a failure on your part. It's extremely funny.
I wouldn't bet on that. In the meantime, you might work on your form/content balance. And I'm not worried. It's your problem, not mine.don't worry; Everyone with any clue and any Cause; got it.Sorry. We speak ENGLISH in here.of course. we don't need affirmative action if we can rely on the moral absolutism of the rule of law.
The only "playing field" needing to be leveled is among economic classes, not race, dum dum. By your dopey scenario, you would be giving AA preference to Black millionaires over poor Whites. Think about how stupid you are. Take a couple of weeks off. Then come back.The words bitter old loon don't even come close when describing you and if I was any more white I'd be classified as albino.No it isn't. You can't pay back at people who had nothing to do with what you're paying back for. Are you an IDIOT ?AA is payback, Whitey, for so many generations of fucking the darkies, literally at times.Any one's person's experience is irrelevant. No matter which way you try to spin it, AA is racist, evil discrimination, and YOU KNOW it.That must be why you spend so much time bitching about how the ******* got all the breaks and fucked you.Where do you get this >? Dreaming out loud ? I've been quite successful in my life, in many ways.
And your use of the word "Whitey", further shows your racism (you might also note that I'm not entirely "White" I'm 50% Hispanic, and I speak fluent Spanish) I don't pretend to be 100% White, like you do. That is just what you WANT to be, not what you are.
And it doesn't matter whether it was your boot on their necks or not, the playing field needed to be leveled and AA helped with that. The sins of the father matter, see the Ten Commandments.
it is a diversion and that form of fallacy for your Cause; only incompetent infidels, protestants, and renegades to their Cause, do that.Not a failure. It was pointing out that speaking vaguely doesn't make good discussion in a computer forum. It was pointing out that too much form, can result in obsuring content. Substance is more important than style. Get it ?Sorry. We speak ENGLISH in here.of course. we don't need affirmative action if we can rely on the moral absolutism of the rule of law.
I'm sure you thought you were "winning" when you posted this but It's clearly a failure on your part. It's extremely funny.
That's the way loon liberals are programmed to see it.Guys, maybe you can tell me, why seeing racism in everything(by black people) is normal, but seeing racism in everything, or at least calling black people racists too(by white people) is always "awful?"
I won't even bother to ask, whaaaaat ??? Maybe you have form disease.[
it is a diversion and that form of fallacy for your Cause; only incompetent infidels, protestants, and renegades to their Cause, do that.
seems more like a reading comprehension issue on your part.I won't even bother to ask, whaaaaat ???it is a diversion and that form of fallacy for your Cause; only incompetent infidels, protestants, and renegades to their Cause, do that.Not a failure. It was pointing out that speaking vaguely doesn't make good discussion in a computer forum. It was pointing out that too much form, can result in obsuring content. Substance is more important than style. Get it ?Sorry. We speak ENGLISH in here.of course. we don't need affirmative action if we can rely on the moral absolutism of the rule of law.
I'm sure you thought you were "winning" when you posted this but It's clearly a failure on your part. It's extremely funny.
Yeah, I heard what you said. I know exactly what you said. You're wrong. Take an English comprehension course.Like I have already stated, Everyone with a clue and a Cause; got it, already.
That is EXACTLY what it is your PART. Your inability to properly balance form and content, to the point where your form (of less importance) washes out your content (of greater importance). Get it ?seems more like a reading comprehension issue on your part.I won't even bother to ask, whaaaaat ???it is a diversion and that form of fallacy for your Cause; only incompetent infidels, protestants, and renegades to their Cause, do that.Not a failure. It was pointing out that speaking vaguely doesn't make good discussion in a computer forum. It was pointing out that too much form, can result in obsuring content. Substance is more important than style. Get it ?Sorry. We speak ENGLISH in here.
I'm sure you thought you were "winning" when you posted this but It's clearly a failure on your part. It's extremely funny.
why? Everyone else but You, got it; apparently.Yeah, I heard what you said. I know exactly what you said. You're wrong. Take an English comprehension course.Like I have already stated, Everyone with a clue and a Cause; got it, already.
no, it is Your limited vocabulary that is the problem.That is EXACTLY what it is your PART. Your inability to properly balance form and content, to the point where your form (of less importance) washes out your content (of greater importance). Get it ?seems more like a reading comprehension issue on your part.I won't even bother to ask, whaaaaat ???it is a diversion and that form of fallacy for your Cause; only incompetent infidels, protestants, and renegades to their Cause, do that.Not a failure. It was pointing out that speaking vaguely doesn't make good discussion in a computer forum. It was pointing out that too much form, can result in obsuring content. Substance is more important than style. Get it ?I'm sure you thought you were "winning" when you posted this but It's clearly a failure on your part. It's extremely funny.
I've been seeing other posters say the same thing to you that I'm saying (for 2 years now), except they're a little less specific about the form/content aspect. Most of us just ignore you, and let you ramble on. So go ahead.why? Everyone else but You, got it; apparently.Yeah, I heard what you said. I know exactly what you said. You're wrong. Take an English comprehension course.Like I have already stated, Everyone with a clue and a Cause; got it, already.
So you have a DENIAL problem too. Well, NOT MY PROBLEM.no, it is Your limited vocabulary that is the problem.
yes, your denial problem only leads you to fallacies.So you have a DENIAL problem too. Well, NOT MY PROBLEM.no, it is Your limited vocabulary that is the problem.
You've got 2 tasks. Form vs content balance, and denial. You can take my advice or not. NOT MY PROBLEM. Good luck.yes, your denial problem only leads you to fallacies.So you have a DENIAL problem too. Well, NOT MY PROBLEM.no, it is Your limited vocabulary that is the problem.
Everyone but You got it; good luck yourself.You've got 2 tasks. Form vs content balance, and denial. You can take my advice or not. NOT MY PROBLEM. Good luck.yes, your denial problem only leads you to fallacies.So you have a DENIAL problem too. Well, NOT MY PROBLEM.no, it is Your limited vocabulary that is the problem.
Everyone but You got it; good luck yourself.You've got 2 tasks. Form vs content balance, and denial. You can take my advice or not. NOT MY PROBLEM. Good luck.yes, your denial problem only leads you to fallacies.So you have a DENIAL problem too. Well, NOT MY PROBLEM.no, it is Your limited vocabulary that is the problem.
just the Clueless and Causeless bandwagon; it is like a bunch of renegades claiming they are an honest Injeun contingent.Everyone but You got it; good luck yourself.You've got 2 tasks. Form vs content balance, and denial. You can take my advice or not. NOT MY PROBLEM. Good luck.yes, your denial problem only leads you to fallacies.So you have a DENIAL problem too. Well, NOT MY PROBLEM.no, it is Your limited vocabulary that is the problem.
Sure. Is that why there's dozens of posts in this forum answering you with >what ?
And the TOPIC is Affirmative Action and Michelle Obama. Not you.
