You know who else has NOT read Mueller's report???.....Yep, Bill Barr

58978490_2521452434579766_1893010155721719808_n.jpg
 
Mueller is The one that saw no crime not Barr.. it was muellers job to find lawbreaking

WHO told you that Mueller "saw no crime" asshole???.....Did Barr and Hannity tell you that little nugget?

Idiots like you SHOULD read the report before making assholes of yourselves.
 
You know who has never talked to Mueller? Yep, just about everyone except Bill Barr. Why do lefties think they know it all? Let it go or the sake of your mental health.


Moron....we WILL be talking to Mueller.........and direct questions will be asked about what he WROTE and you nitwits will have to deal with Barr's "interpretation" of a report that he did NOT read and his Trump ass kissing.
Barr is NOT right legally or morally People should know the facts Barr is guilty of obstruction
 
Lucky Barr can read as quickly as he can, otherwise like Nancy Pelosi, you would have to pass what Mueller reported before you could see what was in it.

Why doesn't an asshole.....like you......simply address the O/P where it ASKS the why Barr did not know about Manafort's treasonous act......nd that it is CLEARLY written in the Mueller report???

Instead of responding like an ASSHOLE.....Address the question or go back to bed.

address the O/P where it ASKS the why Barr did not know about Manafort's treasonous act

Treason? LOL!
 
Did mueller charge trump jr yes or no?

Mueller CANNOT charge the orange moron because.....as he CLEARLY states.....DOJ policy cannot allow him to charge, indict and bring to trial a sitting president.

WHY CAN'T YOU MORONS READ THE REPORT AND GET THIS THROUGH YOUR HEADS?
 
Did mueller charge trump jr yes or no?

Mueller CANNOT charge the orange moron because.....as he CLEARLY states.....DOJ policy cannot allow him to charge, indict and bring to trial a sitting president.

WHY CAN'T YOU MORONS READ THE REPORT AND GET THIS THROUGH YOUR HEADS?
You can Seal and indictment. And he didn’t .. NO LAWS WERE BROKEN. You listen to booker!? Lol have you seen his district?? He admits to sexually assulting a female
 
A seldom mentioned exchange between Barr's testimony before the senate committee, occurred when Booker asked Barr about Manafort's exchanging poll data with a Russian spy during the lead-in to the Republican convention.......

Booker asked Barr about the legality of such collusion with the Russians and Barr responded that he didn't know anything about it.....even though it is clearly written in Mueller's report. Booker mentioned that current law prevents such polling data to be shared with U.S, PACS, the fact that Manafort shared these same data with a hostile, foreign entity seems to be now fully acceptable.

There's only two ways to interpret Barr's "lack of knowledge" of such an event....First, he may be a fucking idiot who has NOT read the Mueller report although he was more than willing to state that the report "fully exonerated Trump"....or........... second, he is a lying stooge..........You choose.


Wrong

Barr did not read every word

Barr read what was needed

He saw clearly the high priority items

Barr has seen the guilt of high treason by the deep state and now going after this highest of all priority crimes or issues

Barr may go after the southern district of New York corrupt leaders
 
You know who has never talked to Mueller? Yep, just about everyone except Bill Barr. Why do lefties think they know it all? Let it go or the sake of your mental health.


Moron....we WILL be talking to Mueller.........and direct questions will be asked about what he WROTE and you nitwits will have to deal with Barr's "interpretation" of a report that he did NOT read and his Trump ass kissing.
Barr is NOT right legally or morally People should know the facts Barr is guilty of obstruction
59480740_346428132744729_7107830691995320320_n.jpg
 
This is yesterday's news, it's over.
The democrats have had their asses handed to them by Barr, time to move on.

Dems will do nothing about it, because they know they have nothing.
 
address the O/P where it ASKS the why Barr did not know about Manafort's treasonous act

Treason? LOL
!


Definition of TREASON......the crime of betraying one's country,

Definition of TREASON......the crime of betraying one's country,

Is that what it says in the Constitution?
If that's what it says Trumps guilty He is supposed to PROTECT this nation Instead he has his arms over the shoulders of dictators ,one of which attacked our election process
 
address the O/P where it ASKS the why Barr did not know about Manafort's treasonous act

Treason? LOL
!


Definition of TREASON......the crime of betraying one's country,

Definition of TREASON......the crime of betraying one's country,

Is that what it says in the Constitution?
If that's what it says Trumps guilty He is supposed to PROTECT this nation Instead he has his arms over the shoulders of dictators ,one of which attacked our election process

If that's what it says Trumps guilty

Show what it really says.

Instead he has his arms over the shoulders of dictators

Is he getting all flexible?
 
A seldom mentioned exchange between Barr's testimony before the senate committee, occurred when Booker asked Barr about Manafort's exchanging poll data with a Russian spy during the lead-in to the Republican convention.......

Booker asked Barr about the legality of such collusion with the Russians and Barr responded that he didn't know anything about it.....even though it is clearly written in Mueller's report. Booker mentioned that current law prevents such polling data to be shared with U.S, PACS, the fact that Manafort shared these same data with a hostile, foreign entity seems to be now fully acceptable.

There's only two ways to interpret Barr's "lack of knowledge" of such an event....First, he may be a fucking idiot who has NOT read the Mueller report although he was more than willing to state that the report "fully exonerated Trump"....or........... second, he is a lying stooge..........You choose.

Booker mentioned that current law prevents such polling data to be shared with U.S, PACS, the fact that Manafort shared these same data with a hostile, foreign entity seems to be now fully acceptable.

Polling data can't be shared with PACS or hostile foreigners?
Link?

If I see a poll in the newspaper, can I share it without getting in trouble?
If a PAC or hostile foreigner reads that paper, is the paper in trouble?

Manafort shared internal campaign polling data, dope.
 

Forum List

Back
Top