You know who else has NOT read Mueller's report???.....Yep, Bill Barr

[edward37]

address the O/P where it ASKS the why Barr did not know about Manafort's treasonous act

Treason? LOL!

Definition of TREASON......the crime of betraying one's country,

Definition of TREASON......the crime of betraying one's country,

Is that what it says in the Constitution?

If that's what it says Trumps guilty He is supposed to PROTECT this nation Instead he has his arms over the shoulders of dictators ,one of which attacked our election process

If that's what it says Trumps guilty

Show what it really says.

Instead he has his arms over the shoulders of dictators

Is he getting all flexible?

What Obama said and what trump says are 2 different things Did Obama say he trusted Putin more than our own agencies ? Did Obama have to fire lead FBI guy because he wouldn't stop investigation ?

 

[imawhosure]

A seldom mentioned exchange between Barr's testimony before the senate committee, occurred when Booker asked Barr about Manafort's exchanging poll data with a Russian spy during the lead-in to the Republican convention.......

Booker asked Barr about the legality of such collusion with the Russians and Barr responded that he didn't know anything about it.....even though it is clearly written in Mueller's report. Booker mentioned that current law prevents such polling data to be shared with U.S, PACS, the fact that Manafort shared these same data with a hostile, foreign entity seems to be now fully acceptable.

There's only two ways to interpret Barr's "lack of knowledge" of such an event....First, he may be a fucking idiot who has NOT read the Mueller report although he was more than willing to state that the report "fully exonerated Trump"....or........... second, he is a lying stooge..........You choose.

Booker mentioned that current law prevents such polling data to be shared with U.S, PACS, the fact that Manafort shared these same data with a hostile, foreign entity seems to be now fully acceptable.

Polling data can't be shared with PACS or hostile foreigners?
Link?

If I see a poll in the newspaper, can I share it without getting in trouble?
If a PAC or hostile foreigner reads that paper, is the paper in trouble?

A seldom mentioned exchange between Barr's testimony before the senate committee, occurred when Booker asked Barr about Manafort's exchanging poll data with a Russian spy during the lead-in to the Republican convention.......

Booker asked Barr about the legality of such collusion with the Russians and Barr responded that he didn't know anything about it.....even though it is clearly written in Mueller's report. Booker mentioned that current law prevents such polling data to be shared with U.S, PACS, the fact that Manafort shared these same data with a hostile, foreign entity seems to be now fully acceptable.

There's only two ways to interpret Barr's "lack of knowledge" of such an event....First, he may be a fucking idiot who has NOT read the Mueller report although he was more than willing to state that the report "fully exonerated Trump"....or........... second, he is a lying stooge..........You choose.

Mueller is The one that saw no crime not Barr.. it was muellers job to find lawbreaking ..

You know who has never talked to Mueller? Yep, just about everyone except Bill Barr. Why do lefties think they know it all? Let it go or the sake of your mental health.

Moron....we WILL be talking to Mueller.........and direct questions will be asked about what he WROTE and you nitwits will have to deal with Barr's "interpretation" of a report that he did NOT read and his Trump ass kissing.

Folks, Nat...…..is well, a GNAT, while also being incompetent, irrelevant, and immaterial! It is the SPECIAL COUNSELS job to recommend to indict, or NOT indict. His recommendation was, NO!

Now, The Charming and Delightful GNAT can complain and point fingers all he/she wants. Barr has NOTHING to do with this at all. It was Muellers case to prove, he got everything he asked for, and no executive priv was ever invoked. The ONLY way this would ever work for the GNAT-En-Fuher, is if the Mueller team recommended indictment, and Barr ignored it, then instead of being known as GNAT, we would be calling him her NAT; and NAT would have a case.

Now then, what GNAT doesn't understand is-----------> CONGRESS can NOT indict anybody! Did you know that GNAT? Only the DOJ can, and the DOJ is part of the executive branch!

By the same token, the DOJ can NOT IMPEACH anyone, only congress can! Is that clear enough to you?

So now, you explain to all these nice people how your team of partisans, could NOT come up with enough evidence to indict the President after 2 years, 1.5 million documents, 500 interviews, and no executive priv ever invoked, but you want Barr to prosecute him. Explain that EXACTLY, since you must be a lawyer and know more than the special counsel, and the AG combined-)

Now then, you CAN impeach him, and I say-------->go for it! But you can't tell Barr to do what can not be done without evidence, you need to scream and your boys and girls in the House!

Of course, it then goes to the Senate, where it needs a 2/3rds vote, and good luck with that!

You may not like how it works, how our laws work, or anything else, but it is the best system in the world. Just because a little GNAT like you is pissed off, doesn't give any weight to change it!

Oh by the way GNAT, as a little side note I am sure you will be interested in--------------> Remember the Hilly e-mail deal? Well, guess who cleared her-) Oppps, that is correct, it was NOT the AG, it was your homey, Jim Comey! Little problem with that, he can not DO that!

So guess what is now being revisited, lol. I will give you 3 guesses, and the 1st, 2 do not count! You really should have prayed for Loretta Lynch when she was AG to also clear Hilly, because that would be considered SETTLED law. She didn't! It was politically to hot of a potato for her, and Comey did it for her, although he can't as he is NOT a prosecutor.

You had better grab your ankles, cause this is going to get real good, pretty fast!

 

[The Irish Ram]

He admits to sexually assulting a female

DON"T go there when defending the orange "pussy grabber".......

I look at your avie and am convinced that you are the orange pussy grabber, and should be labeled as such when anyone here responds to your treasonous tirades...
All those legs, up in the air, spread a part. Nat, the pussy grabber. You are one sick dude. You should be in jail.
There ya go...

 

[Hutch Starskey]

This is yesterday's news, it's over.
The democrats have had their asses handed to them by Barr, time to move on.

Dems will do nothing about it, because they know they have nothing.

That's a nice daily admonition. Tell yourself that throughout the day each and every day. It will shield you and keep you on the righteous path.

 

[edward37]

He admits to sexually assulting a female

DON"T go there when defending the orange "pussy grabber".......

I look at your avie and am convinced that you are the orange pussy grabber, and should be labeled as such when anyone here responds to your treasonous tirades...
All those legs, up in the air, spread a part. Nat, the pussy grabber. You are one sick dude. You should be in jail.
There ya go...

Treason ?? Trump refuses to protect our country from election hacking and fraud from his pal Putin and you repubs kiss the lying trumps butt?

 

[edward37]

This is yesterday's news, it's over.
The democrats have had their asses handed to them by Barr, time to move on.

Dems will do nothing about it, because they know they have nothing.

That's a nice daily admonition. Tell yourself that throughout the day each and every day. It will shield you and keep you on the righteous path.

Barr faces contempt charges on Mon

 

[kyzr]

Its Barr's report he can read it or wipe with it. He can make paper airplanes with it. He can shred it. He can paper his walls with it. Whatever the fuck he wants to do with it. Barr does not have to memorize it. All Barr needed to do is interpret it, and his interpretation is NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION. End of the Mueller report, all done.

Do you want Barr to also wear a brown shirt and jack boots while he makes paper airplanes out of the report???...................You morons are on VERY dangerous grounds.

The Senate is done with the Mueller investigation. The House can stir the pot until 2020, including sending the Sgt. at Arms to arrest Barr, or the House can impeach Trump and/or Barr. What will happen? Nothing. You keep avoiding the next investigation regarding the deep state conspirators. That is the next "big thing". I can hear your wailing about living in a banana republic already. Keep fighting the last war...

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

A seldom mentioned exchange between Barr's testimony before the senate committee, occurred when Booker asked Barr about Manafort's exchanging poll data with a Russian spy during the lead-in to the Republican convention.......

Booker asked Barr about the legality of such collusion with the Russians and Barr responded that he didn't know anything about it.....even though it is clearly written in Mueller's report. Booker mentioned that current law prevents such polling data to be shared with U.S, PACS, the fact that Manafort shared these same data with a hostile, foreign entity seems to be now fully acceptable.

There's only two ways to interpret Barr's "lack of knowledge" of such an event....First, he may be a fucking idiot who has NOT read the Mueller report although he was more than willing to state that the report "fully exonerated Trump"....or........... second, he is a lying stooge..........You choose.

Booker mentioned that current law prevents such polling data to be shared with U.S, PACS, the fact that Manafort shared these same data with a hostile, foreign entity seems to be now fully acceptable.

Polling data can't be shared with PACS or hostile foreigners?
Link?

If I see a poll in the newspaper, can I share it without getting in trouble?
If a PAC or hostile foreigner reads that paper, is the paper in trouble?

Manafort shared internal campaign polling data, dope.

And?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

He admits to sexually assulting a female

DON"T go there when defending the orange "pussy grabber".......

I look at your avie and am convinced that you are the orange pussy grabber, and should be labeled as such when anyone here responds to your treasonous tirades...
All those legs, up in the air, spread a part. Nat, the pussy grabber. You are one sick dude. You should be in jail.
There ya go...

I look at your avie and am convinced that you are the orange pussy grabber, and should be labeled as such when anyone here responds to your treasonous tirades...
All those legs, up in the air, spread a part. Nat, the pussy grabber. You are one sick dude. You should be in jail.
There ya go...

That's the flag of Sicily, dope.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

A seldom mentioned exchange between Barr's testimony before the senate committee, occurred when Booker asked Barr about Manafort's exchanging poll data with a Russian spy during the lead-in to the Republican convention.......

Booker asked Barr about the legality of such collusion with the Russians and Barr responded that he didn't know anything about it.....even though it is clearly written in Mueller's report. Booker mentioned that current law prevents such polling data to be shared with U.S, PACS, the fact that Manafort shared these same data with a hostile, foreign entity seems to be now fully acceptable.

There's only two ways to interpret Barr's "lack of knowledge" of such an event....First, he may be a fucking idiot who has NOT read the Mueller report although he was more than willing to state that the report "fully exonerated Trump"....or........... second, he is a lying stooge..........You choose.

Booker mentioned that current law prevents such polling data to be shared with U.S, PACS, the fact that Manafort shared these same data with a hostile, foreign entity seems to be now fully acceptable.

Polling data can't be shared with PACS or hostile foreigners?
Link?

If I see a poll in the newspaper, can I share it without getting in trouble?
If a PAC or hostile foreigner reads that paper, is the paper in trouble?

Manafort shared internal campaign polling data, dope.

And?

And?

It's not publicly available polling, dope.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

A seldom mentioned exchange between Barr's testimony before the senate committee, occurred when Booker asked Barr about Manafort's exchanging poll data with a Russian spy during the lead-in to the Republican convention.......

Booker asked Barr about the legality of such collusion with the Russians and Barr responded that he didn't know anything about it.....even though it is clearly written in Mueller's report. Booker mentioned that current law prevents such polling data to be shared with U.S, PACS, the fact that Manafort shared these same data with a hostile, foreign entity seems to be now fully acceptable.

There's only two ways to interpret Barr's "lack of knowledge" of such an event....First, he may be a fucking idiot who has NOT read the Mueller report although he was more than willing to state that the report "fully exonerated Trump"....or........... second, he is a lying stooge..........You choose.

Booker mentioned that current law prevents such polling data to be shared with U.S, PACS, the fact that Manafort shared these same data with a hostile, foreign entity seems to be now fully acceptable.

Polling data can't be shared with PACS or hostile foreigners?
Link?

If I see a poll in the newspaper, can I share it without getting in trouble?
If a PAC or hostile foreigner reads that paper, is the paper in trouble?

Manafort shared internal campaign polling data, dope.

And?

And?

It's not publicly available polling, dope.

Sounds awful! What law was violated? Can you show me?

 

[Hellokitty]

Manafort has already been charged and will most likely spend the rest of his life in prison. Spartacus needs to ask Mueller why he didn't charge Manafort on sharing the polling data.
Barr doesn't have time to look over every detail of Mueller's report he's to busy investigating the illegal spying done under the Obama administration.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

A seldom mentioned exchange between Barr's testimony before the senate committee, occurred when Booker asked Barr about Manafort's exchanging poll data with a Russian spy during the lead-in to the Republican convention.......

Booker asked Barr about the legality of such collusion with the Russians and Barr responded that he didn't know anything about it.....even though it is clearly written in Mueller's report. Booker mentioned that current law prevents such polling data to be shared with U.S, PACS, the fact that Manafort shared these same data with a hostile, foreign entity seems to be now fully acceptable.

There's only two ways to interpret Barr's "lack of knowledge" of such an event....First, he may be a fucking idiot who has NOT read the Mueller report although he was more than willing to state that the report "fully exonerated Trump"....or........... second, he is a lying stooge..........You choose.

Booker mentioned that current law prevents such polling data to be shared with U.S, PACS, the fact that Manafort shared these same data with a hostile, foreign entity seems to be now fully acceptable.

Polling data can't be shared with PACS or hostile foreigners?
Link?

If I see a poll in the newspaper, can I share it without getting in trouble?
If a PAC or hostile foreigner reads that paper, is the paper in trouble?

Manafort shared internal campaign polling data, dope.

And?

And?

It's not publicly available polling, dope.

Sounds awful! What law was violated? Can you show me?

LOL...

You tell me, dope.

 

[edward37]

And speaking of trump and his friends How's his buddy Un from NK doing with his missile launches??

 

[caddo kid]

There is no surprise that some fat assed lazy looking piece of turd such as Barr never read the Mueller report, and really; who expected the fucking lap dog AG for Orange Trump to actually function as AG?

That is not what Barr is in place to function as; Barr is in place to seek retribution for his master, Orange Trump.

ALSO: 99.99% of the members here @ USMB that comment on the issue have NEVER read a fucking single sentence of the report.

In Mueller's report, on page 182 of Volume II, page 394 of the PDF, is the following.


IV. CONCLUSION

Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment, we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President' s conduct. The evidence we obtained about the President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment. At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.

Funny as Hell; not a single, sorry Trump supporter has touched that post in five pages since posting.

Too much truth there & we all know Trump supporters hate truth. LOFL

 

[WTH_Progs?]

A seldom mentioned exchange between Barr's testimony before the senate committee, occurred when Booker asked Barr about Manafort's exchanging poll data with a Russian spy during the lead-in to the Republican convention.......

Booker asked Barr about the legality of such collusion with the Russians and Barr responded that he didn't know anything about it.....even though it is clearly written in Mueller's report. Booker mentioned that current law prevents such polling data to be shared with U.S, PACS, the fact that Manafort shared these same data with a hostile, foreign entity seems to be now fully acceptable.

There's only two ways to interpret Barr's "lack of knowledge" of such an event....First, he may be a fucking idiot who has NOT read the Mueller report although he was more than willing to state that the report "fully exonerated Trump"....or........... second, he is a lying stooge..........You choose.

The OP is a prog-lie written by a prog-delusional dressed for propaganda, including the suggestion of "collusion", "legality", "spy", "hostile"..............Read this and you'll see that once again progs are twisting reality, just like what initiated the investigation to begin with.........http://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/breaking-down-barrs-summary.754617/#post-22309261

 

[edward37]

There is no surprise that some fat assed lazy looking piece of turd such as Barr never read the Mueller report, and really; who expected the fucking lap dog AG for Orange Trump to actually function as AG?

That is not what Barr is in place to function as; Barr is in place to seek retribution for his master, Orange Trump.

ALSO: 99.99% of the members here @ USMB that comment on the issue have NEVER read a fucking single sentence of the report.

In Mueller's report, on page 182 of Volume II, page 394 of the PDF, is the following.


IV. CONCLUSION

Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment, we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President' s conduct. The evidence we obtained about the President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment. At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.

Funny as Hell; not a single, sorry Trump supporter has touched that post in five pages since posting.

Too much truth there & we all know Trump supporters hate truth. LOFL

AND a ONE hour conversation with Putin that NEVER mentions russian interference with our elections??? Trump is a FN JOKE

 

[The Irish Ram]

He admits to sexually assulting a female

DON"T go there when defending the orange "pussy grabber".......

I look at your avie and am convinced that you are the orange pussy grabber, and should be labeled as such when anyone here responds to your treasonous tirades...
All those legs, up in the air, spread a part. Nat, the pussy grabber. You are one sick dude. You should be in jail.
There ya go...

Treason ?? Trump refuses to protect our country from election hacking and fraud from his pal Putin and you repubs kiss the lying trumps butt?

Obama allowed the hacking and fraud. Trump was merely a candidate then, remember? It was Obama's "leeway" gift to his friend Vladdie. That, and the flexibility to give away our uranium mines.
Trump is gong to get to the bottom of the Obama's love affair with Putie, though. We want the facts on the Obama, Clinton, Putin manage a trois.

 

[edward37]

Trump is so far over his head in dealing with a highly trained KGB agent Putin....He's taking America to the cleaners

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Booker mentioned that current law prevents such polling data to be shared with U.S, PACS, the fact that Manafort shared these same data with a hostile, foreign entity seems to be now fully acceptable.

Polling data can't be shared with PACS or hostile foreigners?
Link?

If I see a poll in the newspaper, can I share it without getting in trouble?
If a PAC or hostile foreigner reads that paper, is the paper in trouble?

Manafort shared internal campaign polling data, dope.

And?

And?

It's not publicly available polling, dope.

Sounds awful! What law was violated? Can you show me?

LOL...

You tell me, dope.

Can't tell me? Shocking!