You need $6 million to be 'wealthy' in the Bay Area

[Political Junky]

SF is a worldwide popular city, but it has its cost.

Charles Schwab study concludes that you need $6 million to be 'wealthy' in the Bay Area

A new Charles Schwab survey says that in order to be considered "wealthy" in the Bay Area, you need a net worth of at least $6 million. A net worth of $1 million is the baseline for being "comfortable."
<more>

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Liberal utopia's are always the most expensive.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

What do leftists have against the poor?

 

[Toro]

$6 million isn't wealthy.

$600 million is wealthy.

 

[ClosedCaption]

What do leftists have against the poor?

Right, their bumper sticker replies change depending on the story.

This story the goofball above you said liberal areas are always expensive.

Next thread he'll be saying how liberal areas are always poor.

Just depends on the story and they have their auto responses ready to go

 

[WildBillKelsoe]

$6 million isn't wealthy.

$600 million is wealthy.

If I had 6 million bucks I'd be a rich motherfucker.

 

[WildBillKelsoe]

What do leftists have against the poor?

Right, their bumper sticker replies change depending on the story.

This story the goofball above you said liberal areas are always expensive.

Next thread he'll be saying how liberal areas are always poor.

Just depends on the story and they have their auto responses ready to go

He said liberal areas are the most expensive and he's absolutely right.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

$6 million isn't wealthy.

$600 million is wealthy.

If I had 6 million bucks I'd be a rich motherfucker.

Certainly would if you lived most any place else.

 

[Political Junky]

What do leftists have against the poor?

Liberals are the only ones doing anything to help the poor.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

$6 million isn't wealthy.

$600 million is wealthy.

I'll happily take $6 million

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

This story the goofball above you said liberal areas are always expensive.

Next thread he'll be saying how liberal areas are always poor.

Actually, both are correct

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

What do leftists have against the poor?

Liberals are the only ones doing anything to help the poor.

1965 - 18% of Americans living below the "poverty" line

2016 - Trillions of dollars later spent on the Great Society Welfare programs, 18% of Americans living below the "poverty" line.

Keep up the good work!

 

[mdk]

What do leftists have against the poor?

Liberals are the only ones doing anything to help the poor.

Surely you jest.

 

[ClosedCaption]

What do leftists have against the poor?

Liberals are the only ones doing anything to help the poor.

1965 - 18% of Americans living below the "poverty" line

2016 - Trillions of dollars later spent on the Great Society Welfare programs, 18% of Americans living below the "poverty" line.

Keep up the good work!

Are you one of those people that think that welfare programs are supposed to get rid of poor people?

Same token, do you think safety nets are supposed to stop falls?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

What do leftists have against the poor?

Right, their bumper sticker replies change depending on the story.

This story the goofball above you said liberal areas are always expensive.

Next thread he'll be saying how liberal areas are always poor.

Just depends on the story and they have their auto responses ready to go

He meant white leftists.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

What do leftists have against the poor?

Liberals are the only ones doing anything to help the poor.

They're helping them stay poor.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

What do leftists have against the poor?

Liberals are the only ones doing anything to help the poor.

1965 - 18% of Americans living below the "poverty" line

2016 - Trillions of dollars later spent on the Great Society Welfare programs, 18% of Americans living below the "poverty" line.

Keep up the good work!

Are you one of those people that think that welfare programs are supposed to get rid of poor people?

Same token, do you think safety nets are supposed to stop falls?

To Dimocrats, safety nets are hammocks.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

What do leftists have against the poor?

Liberals are the only ones doing anything to help the poor.

Sure. Like in Flint, Detroit, Chicago and Baltimore

Thannnnnnnnnnk you for all your help

 

[Syriusly]

I find it funny that Conservatives are so dismissive of Capitalism and the laws of supply and demand.

The reason why the Bay Area is so expensive is because demand is higher than supply.

More people want to live here than want to live in Montana or Alabama.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

What do leftists have against the poor?

Liberals are the only ones doing anything to help the poor.

1965 - 18% of Americans living below the "poverty" line

2016 - Trillions of dollars later spent on the Great Society Welfare programs, 18% of Americans living below the "poverty" line.

Keep up the good work!

Are you one of those people that think that welfare programs are supposed to get rid of poor people?

Same token, do you think safety nets are supposed to stop falls?

To Dimocrats, safety nets are hammocks.

Excellent metaphor!