YouGov poll (Scientific poll) finds Clinton won debate comfortably

[Mad Scientist]

Sure........

 

[NYcarbineer]

It's one of the bylaws of the Rightwing Cult that members must reject the validity of ANY and EVERY poll that has results that the right doesn't like.

...meanwhile you cling for life to the polls you like.

By "the polls you like", do you mean scientific ones?

When did I say so? I don't pay attention to polling, I can make up my own mind thankyouverymuch.

You spend a lot of time in poll threads for a guy who doesn't pay attention to polls.

Liar. If someone tries to make them an issue and declare victory I may comment on it. That doesn't mean I take the poll seriously. The subject is them, not the poll. That needed to be explained to you, huh?

All I know is you're wrong because polls properly done are reasonably accurate snapshots.

 

[JakeStarkey]

weasel does not care about "reasonably accurate snapshots," he only cares about DJT winning.

 

[Rozman]

All we need to know is that Trump said he won...
So that's it...

No one Else's opinion has any merit ...
Only Trump's....

 

[NYcarbineer]

LMAO.....did any of you loons look at the demographics? 40% said they only saw clips of it or never watched any of the debate. Yeah that's real scientific .LMAO

How does that compare to demographics of "click who you think won!" internet polls?

Nie deflection....your poll is shit. Thread ender

It's a not a deflection, it goes directly to standard and consistency.

NOTHING is known about the clicks in the internet polls.

So if you say that a poll where 40% of respondents didn't see the entire debate is junk, then you MUST reasonably admit that polling where clickers were not required to see ANY debate, or even be actual humans is...well some word a lot more damning than junk.

Online polls often allow you to vote as often as you like. Hardcore RW cultists are obviously going to take advantage of that opportunity.

 

[AntonToo]

All we need to know is that Trump said he won...
So that's it...

No one Else's opinion has any merit ...
Only Trump's....

View attachment 91383

Lets not equalize opinions and facts about opinions.

 

[The VOR]

LMAO.....did any of you loons look at the demographics? 40% said they only saw clips of it or never watched any of the debate. Yeah that's real scientific .LMAO

How does that compare to demographics of "click who you think won!" internet polls?

Nie deflection....your poll is shit. Thread ender

It's a not a deflection, it goes directly to standard and consistency.

NOTHING is known about the clicks in the internet polls.

So if you say that a poll where 40% of respondents didn't see the entire debate is junk, then you MUST reasonably admit that polling where clickers were not required to see ANY debate, or even be actual humans is...well some word a lot more damning than junk.

Online polls often allow you to vote as often as you like. Hardcore RW cultists are obviously going to take advantage of that opportunity.

But, but, but, but, only because they have absolutely nothing better to do with their lives.

 

[paperview]

Trumpsters bragging about these sloppy polls are hilarious.

There was a lot of movements by alt-right script kiddies and relentless trolls who voted over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over.....

The Freepers started back in the 90's doing that, and showing / sharing ways of how to manipulate online polls. They'd have huge threads devoted to it: "Freep this Poll!!" -- and within short order, zooooooop. Hundreds voting hundreds, even thousands of times over, en mass.

Then they all sit back and congratulate themselves on what a splendid job they did.

That's what's happening in alt-right sites right now and places who have undying devotion to Trump, like Stormfront and Daily Stormer.

Trump has in kind rewarded them for their magnificent movements.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

And

every time the far right lies and says Trump won.

Here in the Texas Hill Country, many hard core GOP cons are very disappointed in Trump.

I was a bit disappointed in Trump's performance myself.

That said, I personally wouldn't care if he were caught in a compromising position with a goat. I will vote for him over any Democrat, and especially Hillary Clinton.

Exactly

You see, that is the thing with you partisan hacks. You lame fucks don't even care who is actually running for whatever office. All partisan idiots like you just go into the voting booth and vote straight republican [ticket]

A recent development. Prior to 2000, I considered everyone. No longer. I don't consider the Democratic Party to be an American political party. They've become a weird hybrid of Euro-Fascism and Democratic Socialism combined with a nonsensically wacky New Age worldview reminiscent of a amusement ride at Disney World, which I won't name here due to its earworm theme song.

They lack any coherent idea of human nature.

I now vote straight ticket. Give me a reason to change, and I may consider it. But don't hold your breath.

 

[AntonToo]

I don't consider the Democratic Party to be an American political party.

This should go into a book on how to tell you are crazy.

 

[JakeStarkey]

"euro-fascism" "Democratic Socialism" "New Age"

Billy, you are a dork if you truly believe any of that, and you certainly cannot talk sensibly about those terms.

What we do face is an Alt Right philosophy rooted in cultural and racial taboos and a far right hodge-podge of social cons and corporatists.

And watch a screeching VigilEssentials appear below.

 

[Vigilante]

"euro-fascism" "Democratic Socialism" "New Age"

Billy, you are a dork if you truly believe any of that, and you certainly cannot talk sensibly about those terms.

What we do face is an Alt Right philosophy rooted in cultural and racial taboos and a far right hodge-podge of social cons and corporatists.

Again JakeAss confirms he's a fucking Socialist/DemocRAT!...

 

[JakeStarkey]

from Merriam: "a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition." Yup, Donald is going to make America great again.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

I don't consider the Democratic Party to be an American political party.

This should go into a book on how to tell you are crazy.

Their location does not make them American.

 

[AntonToo]

I don't consider the Democratic Party to be an American political party.

This should go into a book on how to tell you are crazy.

Their location does not make them American.

Their passport does.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

"euro-fascism" "Democratic Socialism" "New Age"

Billy, you are a dork if you truly believe any of that, and you certainly cannot talk sensibly about those terms.

You are one of them, so your words are mere amusement.

 

[Iceweasel]

...meanwhile you cling for life to the polls you like.

By "the polls you like", do you mean scientific ones?

When did I say so? I don't pay attention to polling, I can make up my own mind thankyouverymuch.

You spend a lot of time in poll threads for a guy who doesn't pay attention to polls.

Liar. If someone tries to make them an issue and declare victory I may comment on it. That doesn't mean I take the poll seriously. The subject is them, not the poll. That needed to be explained to you, huh?

All I know is you're wrong because polls properly done are reasonably accurate snapshots.

And a snapshot doesn't tell the whole story. No poll had Trump winning the nomination. No poll had him breaking records for votes or contributions. You can live by polling, not me.

 

[JakeStarkey]

"euro-fascism" "Democratic Socialism" "New Age"

Billy, you are a dork if you truly believe any of that, and you certainly cannot talk sensibly about those terms.

You are one of them, so your words are mere amusement.

You prove my point: you are a dork.

dork dôrk/ noun informal

1. a dull, slow-witted, or socially inept person.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

I don't consider the Democratic Party to be an American political party.

This should go into a book on how to tell you are crazy.

Their location does not make them American.

Their passport does.

Nope. We're talking philosophy here. Democrats would dispense with the Constitution if possible. It's just an impediment to their goals.

What the Democrats seek is diametrically opposed to American founding philosophy.

 

[JakeStarkey]

By "the polls you like", do you mean scientific ones?

When did I say so? I don't pay attention to polling, I can make up my own mind thankyouverymuch.

You spend a lot of time in poll threads for a guy who doesn't pay attention to polls.

Liar. If someone tries to make them an issue and declare victory I may comment on it. That doesn't mean I take the poll seriously. The subject is them, not the poll. That needed to be explained to you, huh?

All I know is you're wrong because polls properly done are reasonably accurate snapshots.

And a snapshot doesn't tell the whole story. No poll had Trump winning the nomination. No poll had him breaking records for votes or contributions. You can live by polling, not me.

You think Trump's handlers don't follow the polls by the second?