YouGov poll (Scientific poll) finds Clinton won debate comfortably

[Vigilante]

Yup, one out of over 20 polls, easily manipulated but idiot, did you look at the demographics?...Tell us about them!

 

[JakeStarkey]

And

every time the far right lies and says Trump won.

Here in the Texas Hill Country, many hard core GOP cons are very disappointed in Trump.

Yeah sure, link the "hard core" ones who are disappointed in Trump. It's easy to type shit

You do it here many times daily.

Just shut up and back up your claim, Fake. I doubt you know any "hard right cons"....seeing you're a dyed in the wool leftard moonbat pretending to be on the right. The sad thing everyone knows it and you keep trying the charade. That defines stupid What difference does some poll make? People will take what they want from the debates, nobody needs morons like the OP cherry picking shit so all you moonbats feel warm and fuzzy

You did it above and below my previous quote. You are a hard Alt Right hater of all things good in America. Polls count, or you would not be whining about them. The OP is scientific, and you hate anything that quantifies and qualifies facts. You are anti-fact. Fact.

Save it and stop with the lame and failed "alt right" BS

You are alt right, anti fact, and believe in cultural and, to a less extent, I might add, racialist taboos. Your guy did not do well.

 

[A Perez]

LOL The people spoke...she lost. But keep trying to convince yourself otherwise

Morning Consult/Politico have a scientific poll too Clinton Bests Trump in Debate, Half of Likely Voters Say - Morning Consult

Oooooh Politico? Stop cherry picking, moron. You do it constantly

The scientific-poll cherries are the only cherries to be picked.

 

[A Perez]

Yup, one out of over 20 polls, easily manipulated but idiot, did you look at the demographics?...Tell us about them!

False, it is not the case that "over 20" scientific polls have been conducted. There have been 4.

 

[NYcarbineer]

LOL The people spoke...she lost. But keep trying to convince yourself otherwise

Of course you think internet polls are more accurate than scientific polls. You're a conservative so you're anti-science and don't understand math.

Where did I say that? Cease making shit up, I'll only make you look the liar and tool you are

You said it in your first post in this thread.

 

[Iceweasel]

LOL The people spoke...she lost. But keep trying to convince yourself otherwise

Are you referring to unscientific polls?

Don't even bother, The very thing that draws Trumpsters to the over-simplicity and hyperbole he sells will prevent them from truly grasping the fundamental difference between scientific and unscientific polling.

It's one of the bylaws of the Rightwing Cult that members must reject the validity of ANY and EVERY poll that has results that the right doesn't like.

...meanwhile you cling for life to the polls you like.

By "the polls you like", do you mean scientific ones?

When did I say so? I don't pay attention to polling, I can make up my own mind thankyouverymuch.

 

[NYcarbineer]

LOL The people spoke...she lost. But keep trying to convince yourself otherwise

Are you referring to unscientific polls?

Don't even bother, it's just too complex for the Trump-predisposed to fully understand the difference.

Yet another one chimes in, the need for left loons to have their beliefs validated by polls continues unabated

Name some polls you accept as valid that do NOT have the results you'd like.

Well Sparky if you really did know me like you think you do you'd know I don't take polls serious. Easy to manipulate. But if this one makes you feel good and gives you the fuzzies have at it. Nobody cares

You cited the polls you liked in your first post.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

LMAO.....did any of you loons look at the demographics? 40% said they only saw clips of it or never watched any of the debate. Yeah that's real scientific .LMAO

 

[Preacher]

She managed to "win" a debate because a moderator was on her side and all her talking heads say she won it. What they don't say is the polls are still swinging towards Trump and Clinton has spent ALL her ammo she has against Trump in 1 debate!

 

[Iceweasel]

That you are incredibly dishonest.

What does it tell you about ABOUT THE POLL you idiot.

That you would vote 4 times tells me you are very dishonest.

 

[Vigilante]

Because the OP and the subversives are lying bastsrds the poll had 40% of the takers say they didn't see the debate or watched only selected clips!!!?!!!

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Because the OP and the subversives are lying bastsrds the poll had 40% of the takers say they didn't see the debate or watched only selected clips!!!?!!!

HAHAHAHAHA "Who do you think won the debate?"

"Well I didn't watch it but Hillary did"

LMAO what a bunch of freaking loons

 

[AntonToo]

That you are incredibly dishonest.

What does it tell you about ABOUT THE POLL you idiot.

That you would vote 4 times tells me you are very dishonest.

if you are out to prove that you are incurably stupid with side of pathetic smallism, then congratulations, you've done it

 

[AntonToo]

LMAO.....did any of you loons look at the demographics? 40% said they only saw clips of it or never watched any of the debate. Yeah that's real scientific .LMAO

How does that compare to demographics of "click who you think won!" internet polls?

 

[NoNukes]

People who are correct on both counts.

 

[JakeStarkey]

I watched it in real time then went back to parts of it.

The difference is that she prepared and cut him every time he offered an opening, which he did far too often.

He (1) must prepare for the next debate, (2) he must stop the nonsense about women, and (3) he dare not explode again ever.

He is on the brink of being pushed or pushing himself off the cliff.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

LMAO.....did any of you loons look at the demographics? 40% said they only saw clips of it or never watched any of the debate. Yeah that's real scientific .LMAO

How does that compare to demographics of "click who you think won!" internet polls?

Nie deflection....your poll is shit. Thread ender

 

[NYcarbineer]

Are you referring to unscientific polls?

Don't even bother, The very thing that draws Trumpsters to the over-simplicity and hyperbole he sells will prevent them from truly grasping the fundamental difference between scientific and unscientific polling.

It's one of the bylaws of the Rightwing Cult that members must reject the validity of ANY and EVERY poll that has results that the right doesn't like.

...meanwhile you cling for life to the polls you like.

By "the polls you like", do you mean scientific ones?

When did I say so? I don't pay attention to polling, I can make up my own mind thankyouverymuch.

You spend a lot of time in poll threads for a guy who doesn't pay attention to polls.

 

[AntonToo]

LMAO.....did any of you loons look at the demographics? 40% said they only saw clips of it or never watched any of the debate. Yeah that's real scientific .LMAO

How does that compare to demographics of "click who you think won!" internet polls?

Nie deflection....your poll is shit. Thread ender

It's a not a deflection, it goes directly to standard and consistency.

NOTHING is known about the clicks in the internet polls.

So if you say that a poll where 40% of respondents didn't see the entire debate is junk, then you MUST reasonably admit that polling where clickers were not required to see ANY debate, or even be actual humans is...well some word a lot more damning than junk.

 

[Iceweasel]

Don't even bother, The very thing that draws Trumpsters to the over-simplicity and hyperbole he sells will prevent them from truly grasping the fundamental difference between scientific and unscientific polling.

It's one of the bylaws of the Rightwing Cult that members must reject the validity of ANY and EVERY poll that has results that the right doesn't like.

...meanwhile you cling for life to the polls you like.

By "the polls you like", do you mean scientific ones?

When did I say so? I don't pay attention to polling, I can make up my own mind thankyouverymuch.

You spend a lot of time in poll threads for a guy who doesn't pay attention to polls.

Liar. If someone tries to make them an issue and declare victory I may comment on it. That doesn't mean I take the poll seriously. The subject is them, not the poll. That needed to be explained to you, huh?