mdk
Diamond Member
- Sep 6, 2014
- 40,558
- 14,042
stephanie, an exception for those who conscientiously object has been given to her, but kim has CHOSEN to not accept it.
When she chose to force her religion on to her employees by threatening to fire them if they did their job, and on to the citizens, it was no longer her personal religious objection, it was infringing on the rights of others.
where did she threaten to fire them? She couldn't do that even if she wanted to. It seems like everyday there is more nonsense added onto this case to make it all right to treat people who disagrees with homosexual as a crime. and that is a dangerous line we are walking. And it's shameful to see so many of you who I thought were more upstanding people to side with the Jailing of this person all over some piece of paper. I don't know, but this whole thing has turned me off to being asked to be accepting of homosexuals when they aren't going to be accepting of others in the country.
Oh, girl please. Suddenly this case has turned you off of accepting gay people. lol. You can lie to yourself until the cows come home but don't expect the rest of us to buy into your mummer's farce.
Last edited: