10 stupid myths liberals believe

Remodeling Maidiac

Diamond Member
Jun 13, 2011
101,230
46,212
2,315
Kansas City
1. I'll have the most transparent administration.

2. I'm gonna close gitmo

3. I will pass comprehensive immigration reform in my first year.

4. I will rein in the overreach of the executive branch.

5. I will work across the isle to build concensus

6. If you like your insurance you can keep it. Period

7. Red lines have consequences

8. Obama isn't a liberal

9. Obama had a real job prior to the Senate

10. Obama has been a good president
 
Here's one that they have had for decades and still have:

Liberals believe that wealth is finite. It is the over-riding misconception that is at the heart of their dogma. They believe that wealth is finite and therefor if someone has wealth, someone else cannot have it. They believe that the rich are hoarding wealth and they think that that is the reason the poor cannot get out of poverty. They believe that there is only so much wealth and that is someone has it then they got it from someone else.

They cannot understand that wealth is created, they cannot understand that there is no limit to the amount of wealth that is available. They can't understand it and in fact they WON'T understand it. If they did, it would undermine all of their core beliefs.

IMO it is the most important myth that the democrats think is true.
 
Last edited:
libs are tolerant because they say they are. disagree with them on that and they will bury you in an avalanche of hate

libs aren enver wrong. they say its not that they think they cant be wron; it's just that they insist their minds are so much better than every body elses that they have already thought everything that can be thought out; and in some kind of weird coincidence; all things in the universe came down on the side of Progressive ideology. so no need to apologize for anything; even thier own failures right in thier (and our) faces; it has to be somebody elses fault


idiots and hypocrites
 
liberals believed in the cheapest campaign slogan in history: "change"
idiots and hypocrites
 
1. I'll have the most transparent administration.

2. I'm gonna close gitmo

3. I will pass comprehensive immigration reform in my first year.

4. I will rein in the overreach of the executive branch.

5. I will work across the isle to build concensus

6. If you like your insurance you can keep it. Period

7. Red lines have consequences

8. Obama isn't a liberal

9. Obama had a real job prior to the Senate

10. Obama has been a good president
I'm a liberal.

And there's only one item on your list I believe.
 
Liberals love to give out money to help other people..................

Problem is they give out other people's money..........................
 
Liberalism is a Psychology

But what is the explanation? Why do seemingly good, intelligent people take positions that cause so much harm in the face of all the facts? I’ve finally stumbled upon the answer, and it’s so stunningly simple, yet profound in its implications, that it’s absolutely mind-boggling. Liberalism isn’t a political ideology; it’s a psychology - the psychology of self-satisfaction to be precise.
 
You wont pay anything more for your health coverage if you have a pre-existing condition, not ONE Cent..

Banning guns will lower violence and protect children.

Raising the Minimum wage will prpvide more jobs and lessen poverty
 
Liberals love to give out money to help other people..................

Problem is they give out other people's money..........................

reagan_facts.jpg


Liberals believe in 'tax and spend' government. PAY as you go. Conservatives, starting with the great socialist Ronald Reagan, believe in 'BORROW and spend' government. Borrow and burden future generations with the bill that was run up on the Beijing credit card.

The results are in...the Reagan revolution was as big of a failure of ideology as the other great failure of the 20th century...the Bolshevik revolution.

Reagan+increased+national+debt.jpg


snapshotinside-020911.jpg


"The debt explosion has resulted not from big spending by the Democrats, but instead the Republican Party's embrace, about three decades ago, of the insidious doctrine that deficits don't matter if they result from tax cuts."
David Stockman - Director of the Office of Management and Budget for U.S. President Ronald Reagan.

feddebt1.png
 
Nice graphs and pretty pictures............

Picturing times when Global Derivatives went out of the Solar System.............

So the too big to fail types can play with Fiat currency in a Pyramid scheme..........

Which they have done again..........with the Feds help haven't they........As they now borrow time just to pay the Margins..............

And as you ignore the actually amounts of debt while under Obama...................

Under Reagan the economy improved...........5 years with Obama............still waiting...Job participation rate sucks...............Some recovery.
 
Nice graphs and pretty pictures............

Picturing times when Global Derivatives went out of the Solar System.............

So the too big to fail types can play with Fiat currency in a Pyramid scheme..........

Which they have done again..........with the Feds help haven't they........As they now borrow time just to pay the Margins..............

And as you ignore the actually amounts of debt while under Obama...................

Under Reagan the economy improved...........5 years with Obama............still waiting...Job participation rate sucks...............Some recovery.

The economy has improved substantially under Obama.

The Stock Market, alone, is just amazing.

It's gained 10,000 points.
 
Nice graphs and pretty pictures............

Picturing times when Global Derivatives went out of the Solar System.............

So the too big to fail types can play with Fiat currency in a Pyramid scheme..........

Which they have done again..........with the Feds help haven't they........As they now borrow time just to pay the Margins..............

And as you ignore the actually amounts of debt while under Obama...................

Under Reagan the economy improved...........5 years with Obama............still waiting...Job participation rate sucks...............Some recovery.

The economy has improved substantially under Obama.

The Stock Market, alone, is just amazing.

It's gained 10,000 points.

LOL

As it did up until 2008..........with 85 BILLION a month of Federal Reserve currency to play with................

It's not equitable growth, it's all BS..............if you look at the graphs of what's going on now you may see something familiar.....................

Job growth............lol.............Labor participation down, stagnant, as poverty has increased with cost's of living going up.................

Your a tool.
 
Nice graphs and pretty pictures............

Picturing times when Global Derivatives went out of the Solar System.............

So the too big to fail types can play with Fiat currency in a Pyramid scheme..........

Which they have done again..........with the Feds help haven't they........As they now borrow time just to pay the Margins..............

And as you ignore the actually amounts of debt while under Obama...................

Under Reagan the economy improved...........5 years with Obama............still waiting...Job participation rate sucks...............Some recovery.

Can't read charts huh?

Under Reagan the economy improved...for WHOM?

Plutocracy-cycle.jpg


Reagan: The Great American Socialist

Let's go back to the early 1980's. In 1981, Reagan signed a law that sharply reduced the income tax for the wealthiest Americans and corporations. The president asserted his program would create jobs, purge inflation and, get this, trim the budget deficit. However, following the tax cut, the deficit soared from 2.5 percent of GDP to over 6 percent, alarming financial markets, sending interest rates sky high, and culminating in the worst recession since the 1930's.

Soon the president realized he needed new revenues to trim the deficit, bring down interest rates and improve his chances for reelection. He would not rescind the income tax cut, but other taxes were acceptable. In 1982, taxes were raised on gasoline and cigarettes, but the deficit hardly budged. In 1983, the president signed the biggest tax rise on payrolls, promising to create a surplus in the Social Security system, while knowing all along that the new revenue would be used to finance the deficit.

The retirement system was looted from the first day the Social Security surplus came into being, because the legislation itself gave the president a free hand to spend the surplus in any way he liked. Thus began a massive transfer of wealth from the poor and the middle class, especially the self-employed small businessman, to the wealthy. The self-employment tax jumped as much as 66 percent.

In 1986, Reagan slashed the top tax rate further. His redistributionist obsession led to a perversity in the law. The wealthiest faced a 28 percent tax rate, while those with lower incomes faced a 33 percent rate; in addition, the bottom rate climbed from 11 percent to 15 percent. For the first time in history, the top rate fell and the bottom rate rose simultaneously. Even unemployment compensation was not spared. The jobless had to pay income tax on their benefits. A year later, the man who would not spare unemployment compensation from taxation called for a cut in the capital gains tax. Thus, Reagan was a staunch socialist, totally committed to his cause of wealth redistribution towards the affluent.

How much wealth transfer has occurred through Reagan's policies? At least $3 trillion.

The Social Security hike generated over $2 trillion in surplus between 1984 and 2007, and if it had been properly invested, say, in AAA corporate bonds it could have earned another trillion by now. At present, the fund is empty, because it has been used up to finance the federal deficits resulting from frequent cuts in income tax rates. If this is not redistribution of wealth from the poor to the rich, what else is?

Thus, Reagan was the first Republican socialist - and a great one, because his wealth transfer occurred on a massive scale. His accomplishment dwarfs even FDR's, and if today the small businessman suffers a crippling tax burden, he must thank Reagan the redistributionist. However, FDR took pains to help the poor, while Reagan took pains to help the wealthiest like himself.


"The excuse cannot be used that Congress massively increased Reagan's budget proposals. On the contrary, there was never much difference between Reagan's and Congress's budgets, and despite propaganda to the contrary, Reagan never proposed a cut in the total budget."
Murray N. Rothbard - former Dean of the Austrian School, an economist, economic historian, and libertarian political philosopher
 
Last edited:
Again, the leftist attack Reagan because their own policies suck................

After Peanut head the inflation was through the roof.............Mr. Stagflation himself.............Reagan killed the inflation first and then we had massive economic improvements.............Most of the increase in debt was the rebuilding of the military which was very much needed..........

He had cuts that would have stopped a good deal of the debt, but could not get them passed as Gov't has always been for more more more...............which is why we are in the dump again......

Add in the Free Trade..........and millions of jobs lost to the third world.
 
1. I'll have the most transparent administration.

2. I'm gonna close gitmo

3. I will pass comprehensive immigration reform in my first year.

4. I will rein in the overreach of the executive branch.

5. I will work across the isle to build concensus

6. If you like your insurance you can keep it. Period

7. Red lines have consequences

8. Obama isn't a liberal

9. Obama had a real job prior to the Senate

10. Obama has been a good president
I'm a liberal.

And there's only one item on your list I believe.

Weird since almost all of them are true.
 

Forum List

Back
Top