When is the last time you saw someone claim that the world is only 7,000 years old?
5781 years old......
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When is the last time you saw someone claim that the world is only 7,000 years old?
How do they know? You can't carbon date something made of stone.
Because carbon dating is flawed!But the whacko religious nuts say that the earth is only 7,000 years old, so how could this be?
Think they look for organic remains in the same area/layer.How do they know? You can't carbon date something made of stone.
Ask them? What the hell kind of a discussion is that?Ask them.
Because carbon dating is flawed!
Whacko? Your tolerance is showing!
Right , And NAGPRA and the SmithsonianCarbon dating is just one tool archaeologists use to date antiquities.
Right , And NAGPRA and the Smithsonian
Are tools to bury those dates if they go against a narrative
They are out to CYA on the Clovis Theory of MigrationThey're all out to get you.
They are out to CYA on the Clovis Theory of Migration
We go to Non Native American Tribal affiliation to early Human Finds and thus negating NAGPRA Rights & considerations to finds 15-45 Thousand years old ( or older )![]()
Clovis debunked: America's first settlers did not take the ice-free corridor
A leading theory for human settlement of the Americas, the ice-free corridor hypothesis, has just been debunked. Where do we go from here?bigthink.com
Not one of them stand up name another if there are so manyCarbon dating is just one tool archaeologists use to date antiquities.
M'kay? So?The point is this is further proof that there was human life before the last ice age.
Carbon dating is science. Everything else is based on assumption.
So explain to me why the Smithsonian would not display these .M'kay? So?