16 prominent GOP lawyers ask for "expeditious impeachment"

[the other mike]

Why Pelosi won't hold a formal vote on impeachment.

 

[Coyote]

TDS overload.

So some lawyers want to circumvent due process. Color me shocked. Time for them to give up their law license and seek help.

What due process? Impeachment is not a legal court. Did Clinton have “due process”?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

If you want to drag people in front of Congress from the Executive............well you need to vote......

False. They can just start an inquiry into impeachment proceedings, then call them.

Oh look, they are doing exactly that.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

TDS overload.

So some lawyers want to circumvent due process. Color me shocked. Time for them to give up their law license and seek help.

What due process? Impeachment is not a legal court. Did Clinton have “due process”?

He knew who his accusers were.

I'm leaning toward the whistleblower being a Schiff construct - that he himself is the whistleblower, and that is the reason for the secrecy. Without some evidence, I have no reason to believe otherwise.

 

[Ricky LIbtardo]

TDS overload.

So some lawyers want to circumvent due process. Color me shocked. Time for them to give up their law license and seek help.

What due process? Impeachment is not a legal court. Did Clinton have “due process”?

yup, the House voted to start an impeachment inquiry, which Pelosi is refusing to do. Gave Clintoon the right of to call witnesses and discovery. Pelosi is chicken, she doesn't want the swing districts on record. She overplayed her hand. Funny stuff.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

If you want to drag people in front of Congress from the Executive............well you need to vote......

False. They can just start an inquiry into impeachment proceedings, then call them.

Oh look, they are doing exactly that.

And look, they aren't showing up.

 

[eagle1462010]

If you want to drag people in front of Congress from the Executive............well you need to vote......

False. They can just start an inquiry into impeachment proceedings, then call them.

Oh look, they are doing exactly that.

The Executive Branch has told Pelosi to go pound sand until a vote occurs.....

Without it they can claim executive priveledge...........all day long.............Congress does NOT have the power to USERP the CONSTITUTION...............This is another fishing expedition like the last 3 years........

You want obstruction.............You got it..........It's called equal branches of the gov't and Executive Priviledge............Good luck in the courts with it.........You are going to need it.

 

[eagle1462010]

TDS overload.

So some lawyers want to circumvent due process. Color me shocked. Time for them to give up their law license and seek help.

What due process? Impeachment is not a legal court. Did Clinton have “due process”?

Congress voted ...............duh..............Vote or pound sand.......

 

[Coyote]

TDS overload.

So some lawyers want to circumvent due process. Color me shocked. Time for them to give up their law license and seek help.

What due process? Impeachment is not a legal court. Did Clinton have “due process”?

yup, the House voted to start an impeachment inquiry, which Pelosi is refusing to do. Gave Clintoon the right of to call witnesses and discovery. Pelosi is chicken, she doesn't want the swing districts on record. She overplayed her hand. Funny stuff.

No vote is required for an impeachment inquiry.

Clinton’s was an impeachment proceeding.

 

[Coyote]

If you want to drag people in front of Congress from the Executive............well you need to vote......

False. They can just start an inquiry into impeachment proceedings, then call them.

Oh look, they are doing exactly that.

The Executive Branch has told Pelosi to go pound sand until a vote occurs.....

Without it they can claim executive priveledge...........all day long.............Congress does NOT have the power to USERP the CONSTITUTION...............This is another fishing expedition like the last 3 years........

You want obstruction.............You got it..........It's called equal branches of the gov't and Executive Priviledge............Good luck in the courts with it.........You are going to need it.

Neither does the president have the power to usurp the Constitution (as you so often reminded us under Democratic presidents).

 

[eagle1462010]

If you want to drag people in front of Congress from the Executive............well you need to vote......

False. They can just start an inquiry into impeachment proceedings, then call them.

Oh look, they are doing exactly that.

The Executive Branch has told Pelosi to go pound sand until a vote occurs.....

Without it they can claim executive priveledge...........all day long.............Congress does NOT have the power to USERP the CONSTITUTION...............This is another fishing expedition like the last 3 years........

You want obstruction.............You got it..........It's called equal branches of the gov't and Executive Priviledge............Good luck in the courts with it.........You are going to need it.

Neither does the president have the power to usurp the Constitution (as you so often reminded us under Democratic presidents).

Well then ......Houston we have a problem................The Congress and the Executive Dept are flipping each other off.........

Time to go to the 3rd branch of gov't..............lol

 

[Ricky LIbtardo]

TDS overload.

So some lawyers want to circumvent due process. Color me shocked. Time for them to give up their law license and seek help.

What due process? Impeachment is not a legal court. Did Clinton have “due process”?

yup, the House voted to start an impeachment inquiry, which Pelosi is refusing to do. Gave Clintoon the right of to call witnesses and discovery. Pelosi is chicken, she doesn't want the swing districts on record. She overplayed her hand. Funny stuff.

No vote is required for an impeachment inquiry.

Clinton’s was an impeachment proceeding.

Semantics. You don't want the swing state Democrats on record. You think you can win in Congress, Trump wins in the court of public opinion. Oh, and Pocahontas won't be President. Sorry.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

George Conway is not a prominent conservative. George Conway is the Trump hating husband of KellyAnn Conway.

Yes, I knew that, but Bezos' Washington Post reported he was "prominent".

So. The Washington Compost lied. What else is new.

 

[Coyote]

TDS overload.

So some lawyers want to circumvent due process. Color me shocked. Time for them to give up their law license and seek help.

What due process? Impeachment is not a legal court. Did Clinton have “due process”?

He knew who his accusers were.

I'm leaning toward the whistleblower being a Schiff construct - that he himself is the whistleblower, and that is the reason for the secrecy. Without some evidence, I have no reason to believe otherwise.

I doubt that given it was verified by the IG and McGraw, a Trump appointee.

Whistleblowers are protected by law, as is right. Otherwise they would be subject to harassment, firing, death.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

TDS overload.

So some lawyers want to circumvent due process. Color me shocked. Time for them to give up their law license and seek help.

What due process? Impeachment is not a legal court. Did Clinton have “due process”?

He knew who his accusers were.

I'm leaning toward the whistleblower being a Schiff construct - that he himself is the whistleblower, and that is the reason for the secrecy. Without some evidence, I have no reason to believe otherwise.

He is probably a leprechaun, riding a unicorn, because you have no reason to believe otherwise...

No. The only reason you have is trump cultism. Period.

 

[Coyote]

TDS overload.

So some lawyers want to circumvent due process. Color me shocked. Time for them to give up their law license and seek help.

What due process? Impeachment is not a legal court. Did Clinton have “due process”?

yup, the House voted to start an impeachment inquiry, which Pelosi is refusing to do. Gave Clintoon the right of to call witnesses and discovery. Pelosi is chicken, she doesn't want the swing districts on record. She overplayed her hand. Funny stuff.

No vote is required for an impeachment inquiry.

Clinton’s was an impeachment proceeding.

Semantics. You don't want the swing state Democrats on record. You think you can win in Congress, Trump wins in the court of public opinion. Oh, and Pocahontas won't be President. Sorry.

Trump isn’t doing so hot in the court of public opinion.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The Executive Branch has told Pelosi to go pound sand until a vote occurs.....

Neat! And they will do the same thing AFTER a vote occurs. Because that's what guilty people do.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

If you want to drag people in front of Congress from the Executive............well you need to vote......

False. They can just start an inquiry into impeachment proceedings, then call them.

Oh look, they are doing exactly that.

The Executive Branch has told Pelosi to go pound sand until a vote occurs.....

Without it they can claim executive priveledge...........all day long.............Congress does NOT have the power to USERP the CONSTITUTION...............This is another fishing expedition like the last 3 years........

You want obstruction.............You got it..........It's called equal branches of the gov't and Executive Priviledge............Good luck in the courts with it.........You are going to need it.

Neither does the president have the power to usurp the Constitution (as you so often reminded us under Democratic presidents).

Well then ......Houston we have a problem................The Congress and the Executive Dept are flipping each other off.........

Time to go to the 3rd branch of gov't..............lol

SCOTUS is going to have a busy year.

 

[Coyote]

If you want to drag people in front of Congress from the Executive............well you need to vote......

False. They can just start an inquiry into impeachment proceedings, then call them.

Oh look, they are doing exactly that.

The Executive Branch has told Pelosi to go pound sand until a vote occurs.....

Without it they can claim executive priveledge...........all day long.............Congress does NOT have the power to USERP the CONSTITUTION...............This is another fishing expedition like the last 3 years........

You want obstruction.............You got it..........It's called equal branches of the gov't and Executive Priviledge............Good luck in the courts with it.........You are going to need it.

Neither does the president have the power to usurp the Constitution (as you so often reminded us under Democratic presidents).

Well then ......Houston we have a problem................The Congress and the Executive Dept are flipping each other off.........

Time to go to the 3rd branch of gov't..............lol

What if Trump committed a crime, or at the very least a serious breech of using his position to extort a favor to investigate a political opponent. Would you support it?

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

TDS overload.

So some lawyers want to circumvent due process. Color me shocked. Time for them to give up their law license and seek help.

What due process? Impeachment is not a legal court. Did Clinton have “due process”?

He knew who his accusers were.

I'm leaning toward the whistleblower being a Schiff construct - that he himself is the whistleblower, and that is the reason for the secrecy. Without some evidence, I have no reason to believe otherwise.

I doubt that given it was verified by the IG and McGraw, a Trump appointee.

Whistleblowers are protected by law, as is right. Otherwise they would be subject to harassment, firing, death.

No one can be trusted at this point. Evidence is all.