easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,165
A minor boy and his mother are suing Twitter, alleging that it benefited from and neglected to remove an exploitative video -- featuring him and another minor -- which was retweeted thousands of times and at least 167,000 views on the platform.
Announced on Wednesday, the federal lawsuit claims that the minor, John Doe, and his mother repeatedly contacted Twitter about the content, but the social media giant allegedly didn't suspend accounts distributing it until a federal agent from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) intervened.
Genocidal, homosexual-murdering, terrorist-supporting, 3rd-world dictators have been able to keep Twitter accounts, while Jack Dorsey and Twitter targeted, censored, and eliminated Twitter accounts of Conservatives.
We have HEARD a lot about 'Twitter Standards / Content Policy', about what they find offensive and being 'unacceptable'....but we have SEEN a will to facilitate content of the worse kind....like this:
Despite being contacted by the victim of Child-Trafficking sexual exploitation and asked to delete both sexually explicit photos and videos of the victim, Jack Dorsey and Twitter refused to do so and told the victim the sexually exploited child porn pictures and videos of him on their site was not a violation of their TOS.
There is now a lawsuit against Twitter ...
"Wednesday's lawsuit was just one of many to emerge in recent months as large content distributors like Pornhub faced mounting scrutiny over Child Sex Abuse Material (CSAM) and sex trafficking victims on their platforms. Tech giants like Facebook and Twitter generally enjoy immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which former President Trump and others have suggested repealing due to apparent political bias in the way platforms censor content."
"John Doe is seeking damages under the federal Trafficking Victims' Protection Reauthorization Act, and claiming the platform was a significant cause of his distress. As the suit noted, recent legislation has clarified that Section 230 doesn't apply to platforms that knowingly facilitate sex trafficking."
Democrats / Politicians jut recently gave Twitter and Facebook Section 230 Immunity with which they have and continue to engage in Child Porn and Child Trafficking facilitation / crime...not just targeting, silencing, and deleting the accounts of Conservatives and Trump supporters.
This law suit will help determine if Section 230 Immunity overrides the federal Trafficking Victims' Protection Reauthorization Act...and if Section 230 Immunity / protection for Big Tech should be stripped.
Announced on Wednesday, the federal lawsuit claims that the minor, John Doe, and his mother repeatedly contacted Twitter about the content, but the social media giant allegedly didn't suspend accounts distributing it until a federal agent from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) intervened.
Genocidal, homosexual-murdering, terrorist-supporting, 3rd-world dictators have been able to keep Twitter accounts, while Jack Dorsey and Twitter targeted, censored, and eliminated Twitter accounts of Conservatives.
We have HEARD a lot about 'Twitter Standards / Content Policy', about what they find offensive and being 'unacceptable'....but we have SEEN a will to facilitate content of the worse kind....like this:
Despite being contacted by the victim of Child-Trafficking sexual exploitation and asked to delete both sexually explicit photos and videos of the victim, Jack Dorsey and Twitter refused to do so and told the victim the sexually exploited child porn pictures and videos of him on their site was not a violation of their TOS.
There is now a lawsuit against Twitter ...
"Wednesday's lawsuit was just one of many to emerge in recent months as large content distributors like Pornhub faced mounting scrutiny over Child Sex Abuse Material (CSAM) and sex trafficking victims on their platforms. Tech giants like Facebook and Twitter generally enjoy immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which former President Trump and others have suggested repealing due to apparent political bias in the way platforms censor content."
"John Doe is seeking damages under the federal Trafficking Victims' Protection Reauthorization Act, and claiming the platform was a significant cause of his distress. As the suit noted, recent legislation has clarified that Section 230 doesn't apply to platforms that knowingly facilitate sex trafficking."
Democrats / Politicians jut recently gave Twitter and Facebook Section 230 Immunity with which they have and continue to engage in Child Porn and Child Trafficking facilitation / crime...not just targeting, silencing, and deleting the accounts of Conservatives and Trump supporters.
This law suit will help determine if Section 230 Immunity overrides the federal Trafficking Victims' Protection Reauthorization Act...and if Section 230 Immunity / protection for Big Tech should be stripped.
Twitter sued by survivor of child sexual exploitation
A minor boy and his mother are suing Twitter, alleging that it benefited from and neglected to remove an exploitative video -- featuring him and another minor -- which was retweeted thousands of times and at least 167,000 views on the platform.
www.foxnews.com