21 Years Ago Today We Were Bombed By A Gun Toting, anti-Government RWer

[Fair&Balanced]

"suck it" I'll have to remember that retort in the threads where liberals are whining (virtually every thread I've read since being here)

 

[easyt65]

Just curious...

Does the OP 'celebrate' the anniversary of each bombing perpetrated by Obama's buddy, Bill Ayers? Will he 'celebrate' the anniversary of the 12 murders by the terrorist to whom Obama gave a visa and welcomed into the country? Will the OP 'celebrate' the anniversary of the murders, rapes, and robberies of Americans by the violent, criminal illegals Obama has allowed and helped bring into this coutry?

No. The OP is not interested in any of those because his bitter partisan hatred will not allow him to.

 

[Londoner]

an anarchist is now automatically RW?

McVeigh was intensely interested in the 2nd Amendment, which put him squarely on the right. He was a military man who railed against what he called the tyrannical federal government. He was outspoken in his criticism of the Clinton's Waco Seige, specifically the government's trampling of the first amendment (the religious rights of the Branch Davidians; the right to peacefully congregate) and the second amendment (their right to bear arms as a form of protection from a tyrannical government).

Tim McVeigh was categorically and self-admittedly on the Right. He was among the first wave of Rightwing Americans to be infected by talk radio, which prodded unstable people with poor educations to "take their country back".

McVeigh's mass murder was pure Rightwing Terrorism. He followed Rightwing ideology to its rational conclusion, which mandates that citizens take their country back by force if necessary.

 

[kaz]

an anarchist is now automatically RW?

McVeigh was intensely interested in the 2nd Amendment, which put him squarely on the right. He was a military man who railed against what he called the tyrannical federal government. He was outspoken in his criticism of the Clinton's Waco Seige, specifically the government's trampling of the first amendment (the religious rights of the Branch Davidians; the right to peacefully congregate) and the second amendment (their right to bear arms as a form of protection from a tyrannical government).

Tim McVeigh was categorically and self-admittedly on the Right. He was among the first wave of Rightwing Americans to be infected by talk radio, which prodded unstable people with poor educations to "take their country back".

McVeigh's mass murder was pure Rightwing Terrorism. He followed Rightwing ideology to its rational conclusion, which mandates that citizens take their country back by force if necessary.

"Infected by right radio," you need to stop getting your stupid, useless opinions from MS-NBC, LOL. The irony.

And taking the country back isn't a reference to violence, baa, baa sheep

 

[Rambunctious]

McVeigh was intensely interested in the 2nd Amendment, which put him squarely on the right. He was a military man who railed against what he called the tyrannical federal government. He was outspoken in his criticism of the Clinton's Waco Seige, specifically the government's trampling of the first amendment (the religious rights of the Branch Davidians; the right to peacefully congregate) and the second amendment (their right to bear arms as a form of protection from a tyrannical government).

Tim McVeigh was categorically and self-admittedly on the Right. He was among the first wave of Rightwing Americans to be infected by talk radio, which prodded unstable people with poor educations to "take their country back".

McVeigh's mass murder was pure Rightwing Terrorism. He followed Rightwing ideology to its rational conclusion, which mandates that citizens take their country back by force if necessary.

If McVeigh is from the right than Osama Bin Laden is from the left.

 

[Hossfly]

an anarchist is now automatically RW?

McVeigh was a gun toting, anti-Government Libertarian. He was in fact a RWer.

ted Kaczynski was also anti-government.

Was he a libertarian, a 'RWer'?

or an anarchist?

He wouldn't be left or right wing because he was an anarchist. Plus he was a whacko He was trying to bring down the government because of Waco. People like him don't have a political agenda. They just want revenge and carnage.

 

[HenryBHough]

Reflecting on the headline....

"21 Years Ago Today We Were Bombed By A Gun Toting, anti-Government RWer"

Clear the OP would prefer the job had been outsourced to one of his ISIS buddies...and here we thought liberals said they wanted to keep jobs in America.....

 

[kaz]

an anarchist is now automatically RW?

McVeigh was a gun toting, anti-Government Libertarian. He was in fact a RWer.

ted Kaczynski was also anti-government.

Was he a libertarian, a 'RWer'?

or an anarchist?

He wouldn't be left or right wing because he was an anarchist. Plus he was a whacko He was trying to bring down the government because of Waco. People like him don't have a political agenda. They just want revenge and carnage.

Clearly he didn't represent the right. But his views were more right driven just like the Unibomber's views where more left driven. In the end, they were both whack jobs. McVeigh was right about Waco and Ruby Ridge, but it's mental illness to think the response to government murdering innocent people is to murder more innocent people

 

[kaz]

Reflecting on the headline....

"21 Years Ago Today We Were Bombed By A Gun Toting, anti-Government RWer"

Clear the OP would prefer the job had been outsourced to one of his ISIS buddies...and here we thought liberals said they wanted to keep jobs in America.....

Note the President would say the thread title too, but the President won't identify most of those attempting to commit mass murder in the world as Muslim. Truth is nothing to these people

 

[Uncensored2008]

15 years ago the trade center buildings were knocked down by members of the religion of peace...you know...Obama's buddies!

There is nothing in that act that can be used to impugn the enemies of the party, so Cruella is not concerned with that attack.

 

[Iceweasel]

an anarchist is now automatically RW?

McVeigh was a gun toting, anti-Government Libertarian. He was in fact a RWer.

So you define RW however it pleases you.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Cruella, can you point to anyone on the right who has excused McVeigh or is upset that the scumbag was put down like the rabid dog he was?

Didn't think so.

Meanwhile Obama continues to release gitmo terrorists....

 

[kaz]

an anarchist is now automatically RW?

McVeigh was a gun toting, anti-Government Libertarian. He was in fact a RWer.

So you define RW however it pleases you.

That she called him a member of the Libertarian party and a right winger in the same post shows what an air headed twit she is

 

[kaz]

Cruella, can you point to anyone on the right who has excused McVeigh or is upset that the scumbag was put down like the rabid dog he was?

Didn't think so.

Meanwhile Obama continues to release gitmo terrorists....

Everyone I've known on the right was glad he was juiced

 

[Londoner]

Just curious...

Does the OP 'celebrate' the anniversary of each bombing perpetrated by Obama's buddy, Bill Ayers? Will he 'celebrate' the anniversary of the 12 murders by the terrorist to whom Obama gave a visa and welcomed into the country? Will the OP 'celebrate' the anniversary of the murders, rapes, and robberies of Americans by the violent, criminal illegals Obama has allowed and helped bring into this coutry?

No. The OP is not interested in any of those because his bitter partisan hatred will not allow him to.

Of course there is leftwing terrorism. And of course Ayres was a leftwing terrorist.

His violence was not against people but symbols of power - and he was never convicted of killing anyone. Perhaps this is also true of McVeigh, but he killed 168 people. This is like comparing Clinton's negligence on Benghazi to Bush's negligence RE 9/11 where he ignored the Aug 9 memo and left the eastern seaboard undefended.

But the worse part of your indignation is that you are truly the pot calling the kettle black - your partisan hatred far exceeds that of the OP.

 

[Iceweasel]

He was an atheist Democrat.

Actually he was an agnostic mental whack job

According to Wiki..

In a 1996 interview, McVeigh professed belief in "a God", although he said he had "sort of lost touch with" Catholicism and "I never really picked it up, however I do maintain core beliefs."

Timothy McVeigh - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

That's what happens when you use a source like wikipedia. McVeigh was a Christian in his younger days. And anti-government mass murdering isn't a core Christian value. He was mostly inspired by Waco and Ruby Ridge.

 

[Carla_Danger]

He was an atheist Democrat.

Actually he was an agnostic mental whack job

According to Wiki..

In a 1996 interview, McVeigh professed belief in "a God", although he said he had "sort of lost touch with" Catholicism and "I never really picked it up, however I do maintain core beliefs."

Timothy McVeigh - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

That's what happens when you use a source like wikipedia. McVeigh was a Christian in his younger days. And anti-government mass murdering isn't a core Christian value. He was mostly inspired by Waco and Ruby Ridge.

You did not hear me claim he was a RW Christian terrorist, did you?

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

Did they ever find out who the unidentified real bomber was?

Context of 'August 7, 1995: Unidentified Leg Found in Oklahoma City Bombing Rubble; Defense Lawyer Says Leg May Belong to ‘Real Bomber’'

 

[Carla_Danger]

Just curious...

Does the OP 'celebrate' the anniversary of each bombing perpetrated by Obama's buddy, Bill Ayers? Will he 'celebrate' the anniversary of the 12 murders by the terrorist to whom Obama gave a visa and welcomed into the country? Will the OP 'celebrate' the anniversary of the murders, rapes, and robberies of Americans by the violent, criminal illegals Obama has allowed and helped bring into this coutry?

No. The OP is not interested in any of those because his bitter partisan hatred will not allow him to.

Of course there is leftwing terrorism. And of course Ayres was a leftwing terrorist.

His violence was not against people but symbols of power - and he was never convicted of killing anyone. Perhaps this is also true of McVeigh, but he killed 168 people. This is like comparing Clinton's negligence on Benghazi to Bush's negligence RE 9/11 where he ignored the Aug 9 memo and left the eastern seaboard undefended.

But the worse part of your indignation is that you are truly the pot calling the kettle black - your partisan hatred far exceeds that of the OP.

Thank you. I agree. I have no problem calling Ayers a left wing terrorist, because that's exactly what he was.

 

[easyt65]

Just curious...

Does the OP 'celebrate' the anniversary of each bombing perpetrated by Obama's buddy, Bill Ayers? Will he 'celebrate' the anniversary of the 12 murders by the terrorist to whom Obama gave a visa and welcomed into the country? Will the OP 'celebrate' the anniversary of the murders, rapes, and robberies of Americans by the violent, criminal illegals Obama has allowed and helped bring into this coutry?

No. The OP is not interested in any of those because his bitter partisan hatred will not allow him to.

Of course there is leftwing terrorism. And of course Ayres was a leftwing terrorist.

His violence was not against people but symbols of power - and he was never convicted of killing anyone. Perhaps this is also true of McVeigh, but he killed 168 people. This is like comparing Clinton's negligence on Benghazi to Bush's negligence RE 9/11 where he ignored the Aug 9 memo and left the eastern seaboard undefended.

But the worse part of your indignation is that you are truly the pot calling the kettle black - your partisan hatred far exceeds that of the OP.

Bill Ayers" terrorism was not against people but was a symbol of power ?! WHAT LIBERAL EXCUSE-MAKING, JUSTIFYING BULLSHIT!

Ayers and his band of liberal terrorists targeted 1st responders and killed policemen. So how in the hell was his terrorism not against people? I am sure the family of those they killed would disagree with you.

Seems you're saying 'no harm no foul' when liberals engage in terrorism, trying to minimize their murder and carnage. Thanks for proving my point about blind, ignorant partisanship.

Terrorism is to be condemned, not used as a partisan political weapon as the OP has tried to do.