progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 62,662
- 38,431
- 2,615
we are all assembled here for a holy matrimony,,Wut ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
we are all assembled here for a holy matrimony,,Wut ?
That may be true, and I didn't say that California didn't have gun-related homicide. But the fact that the states that have the strictest gun control have comparatively few cities in the top 25 of gun-related homicides is saying something.
But what says a lot more - and what has for years - is how the USA has far more gun-related killings than any other advanced or even semi-advanced society on earth. That is really and truly the end of the debate.
That may be true, and I didn't say that California didn't have gun-related homicide. But the fact that the states that have the strictest gun control have comparatively few cities in the top 25 of gun-related homicides is saying something.
But what says a lot more - and what has for years - is how the USA has far more gun-related killings than any other advanced or even semi-advanced society on earth. That is really and truly the end of the debate.
And you have been shown this before........pay attention this time.....
The Heritage authors'
I stopped reading here. The Heritage is a right wing think tank, which is at the heart of the problem I've discussed at length.
And as I said before, I'm not going to read the equivalent of Genesis in a single post. You can call it a 'win' if you want - I don't care.
Europe murdered 15 million innocent men, women and children in just 6 years after registering, banning and confiscating their guns from the 1920s through the 1930s.....from 1939-1945, the socialists in Europe murdered these people...not war dead, not collateral from the conflict, people rounded up, put on trains and marched into forests and murdered.....
Meanwhile, in the U.S.......our gun murder number for our entire 246 year history?
Around 2,460,000 if you take 10,000 gun murders a year as about the average number........
So......find a small child to tell you which number is actually bigger....maybe you will understand why we won't be giving up our guns any time soon....
You lie about democrat cities......and then you ignore when the evidence shows you lied...
yeah like the nazis were what 300 yrs ago and shit,,,More bullshit history I'm not even going to attempt to rebut because it's clearly more Fox igno-babble. Sure, let's talk about Nazis when we're clearly referring to modern times. Why stop there? Why not talk about the Civil War or the genocide of American Indians -- doesn't fit your narrative.
currently under biden we are lawless and in a civil war,,,Nope, the US is more violent than other modern or even semi-modern societies that aren't lawless or in a civil war.
currently under biden we are lawless and in a civil war,,,
yes it is,, but this is reality,,Your imagination is a wild place.
More bullshit history I'm not even going to attempt to rebut because it's clearly more Fox igno-babble. Sure, let's talk about Nazis when we're clearly referring to modern times. Why stop there? Why not talk about the Civil War or the genocide of American Indians -- doesn't fit your narrative.
They murdered 15 million people in 6 years after taking guns away from people...
Why do you think it cant happen again when it has happened all around the world?
not in our scale,, they are left wing,,Nazism was a right wing movement.
Nope, the US is more violent than other modern or even semi-modern societies that aren't lawless or in a civil war.
BLM / ANTIFA / Black Bloc beg to differYour imagination is a wild place.
Germany from 1934-1945 was a Socialist Government led by a Fascist DictatorNazism was a right wing movement.
Who do you define as “the left”?
I certainly don’t want to get rid of all guns. I own four.
Add Gorsuch to that listI'm saying it's corrupt because we have at least one justice who is getting compensated by a billionaire right wing political megadonor and not reporting it -- that is textbook corruption, plain and simple. If that were a political candidate, he would be looking at a criminal trial. He should be looking at one now but the law doesn't apparently provide a criminal penalty; he can therefore likely only be impeach or otherwise forced to resign.
And then we learned yesterday that Neil Gorsuch apparently has had business transactions with a law firm with matters before the Court -- more textbook corruption. But the same remedy.
Alito is just off his chain -- he doesn't even hide the fact that he doesn't give a fuck about stare decisis anymore; he just writes whatever opinion he feels like writing.
So no, I don't respect this court majority - at all. I will never see it as legitimate. I think millions out there feel similarly, and we will probably ultimately need some sort of bipartisan commission at some point to restore faith in the judiciary, because nobody will respect the current hyper-politicized nominations/confirmations process. Being honest, yes, I would agree that Kagan, Sotomayor, and Brown-Jackson are a product of that same process, so it goes both ways, but that's the point: we need a clean slate of actual jurists, not partisans. People who are capable of ruling on either side of the spectrum based on a legal analysis, not their ideology.
The Court is broken.
not in our scale,, they are left wing,,