48 people killed in less than a month

OK, fellows, we have a problem. Another couple of months like that, and you will see some pretty strict gun control laws. Laws approved of by the majority of the people of the nation.

So you really need to come up with some answers other than foaming at the mouth rants about your freedoms.

Well, I'm with you, boyo. But I NEVER bring up this crap, because, then THEY bring up stats like people killed in car accidents, should we ban cars? sh*t. Well, maybe we SHOULD. But, that is a different board, different topic. But, gee, have all these maniacs with guns going on rampages in old folks homes or in Immigrant Centers or,well you get it. I live near Columbine HS. And, I wonder about how good guns are. Or how some of you folks think the elderly or kids need guns to protect themselves from sickos that love guns? Sickos love guns. And they want their right to bare them preserved, they don't give a darn about anything else.

"When I carry a gun, I don't do so because I am looking for a fight, but because I'm looking to be left alone. The gun at my side means that I cannot be forced, only persuaded. I don't carry it because I'm afraid, but because it enables me to be unafraid. It doesn't limit the actions of those who would interact with me through reason, only the actions of those who would do so by force. "
the munchkin wrangler.: why the gun is civilization.
 
OK, fellows, we have a problem. Another couple of months like that, and you will see some pretty strict gun control laws. Laws approved of by the majority of the people of the nation.

So you really need to come up with some answers other than foaming at the mouth rants about your freedoms.

Well, I'm with you, boyo. But I NEVER bring up this crap, because, then THEY bring up stats like people killed in car accidents, should we ban cars? sh*t. Well, maybe we SHOULD. But, that is a different board, different topic. But, gee, have all these maniacs with guns going on rampages in old folks homes or in Immigrant Centers or,well you get it. I live near Columbine HS. And, I wonder about how good guns are. Or how some of you folks think the elderly or kids need guns to protect themselves from sickos that love guns? Sickos love guns. And they want their right to bare them preserved, they don't give a darn about anything else.

"When I carry a gun, I don't do so because I am looking for a fight, but because I'm looking to be left alone. The gun at my side means that I cannot be forced, only persuaded. I don't carry it because I'm afraid, but because it enables me to be unafraid. It doesn't limit the actions of those who would interact with me through reason, only the actions of those who would do so by force. "
the munchkin wrangler.: why the gun is civilization.

I knew there was something I liked about you and your from Brooklyn too,hottest Women are from NYC and particularly Brooklyn,I know I 'm married to one who Graduated from Mid wood, great lady.
She also has 5 guns and there is no way she will give them up.
 
Well, I'm with you, boyo. But I NEVER bring up this crap, because, then THEY bring up stats like people killed in car accidents, should we ban cars? sh*t. Well, maybe we SHOULD. But, that is a different board, different topic. But, gee, have all these maniacs with guns going on rampages in old folks homes or in Immigrant Centers or,well you get it. I live near Columbine HS. And, I wonder about how good guns are. Or how some of you folks think the elderly or kids need guns to protect themselves from sickos that love guns? Sickos love guns. And they want their right to bare them preserved, they don't give a darn about anything else.

"When I carry a gun, I don't do so because I am looking for a fight, but because I'm looking to be left alone. The gun at my side means that I cannot be forced, only persuaded. I don't carry it because I'm afraid, but because it enables me to be unafraid. It doesn't limit the actions of those who would interact with me through reason, only the actions of those who would do so by force. "
the munchkin wrangler.: why the gun is civilization.

I knew there was something I liked about you and your from Brooklyn too,hottest Women are from NYC and particularly Brooklyn,I know I 'm married to one who Graduated from Mid wood, great lady.
She also has 5 guns and there is no way she will give them up.

There is definitely something about a good looking woman carrying.
 
The problem with right wingers is they can't put their finger on why there is so much violence in our nation with guns.


The truth IS that guns don't kill people. People kill people. Conservatives will agree.


The other truth is that our CULTURE is the reason we have such gun violence. We are the most aggressive nation in the world right now on the global stage. Why shouldn't it be the same at home?


How are citizens supposed to watch their government bomb the crap out of apartment buildings with women and children inside (yes, this happens) and not feel like we get to do that too.



Our government leads by example.


Just ask the Indians.
 
Politicalchic, that must make me a conservative. Uber Conservative. i don't know how many times i have been threatened by people WITH guns, and that is no joke. Last time I listed details, one of you kindred told me I needed therapy. Won't mention names, but after reading all those HOSTILE posts in response, it was like the pot calling the kettle black. Hostile and aggressive people with firearms. I don't own a gun, either. I am no threat to you. I just want some of you folks to get real and stop this paranoid shit. I know that won't happen anytime soon.
 
The problem with right wingers is they can't put their finger on why there is so much violence in our nation with guns.


The truth IS that guns don't kill people. People kill people. Conservatives will agree.


The other truth is that our CULTURE is the reason we have such gun violence. We are the most aggressive nation in the world right now on the global stage. Why shouldn't it be the same at home?


How are citizens supposed to watch their government bomb the crap out of apartment buildings with women and children inside (yes, this happens) and not feel like we get to do that too.



Our government leads by example.


Just ask the Indians.

If you are going to make such an assertion, I would like to see documentation showing crime rates during peacetime vs. crime rates during wartime, please.
 
Indians were not keen on science or physics . They lost, and I pity them. I bet they wish they had NOW, though.
 
48 people ? That's a little over a month in the small city of Baltimore. Funny, Baltimore has supposedly "tough" gun laws. Seems to be working well for the criminals .......

Once again the confusion sets in.

Criminals don't give a fuck about "gun laws" - have you noticed that? I have. And they don't give a fuck because.....wait for it....they're criminals! :lol:

But firearms control laws aren't about crime control, they're about harm minimisation from the private ownership/use/possession of firearms.


No confusion here mate, if enough criminals get blasted by gun toting, law abiding citizens, i'm thinking crime goes down.......

No confusion? But your statement has no bearing on what I posted :confused:
 
48 people ? That's a little over a month in the small city of Baltimore. Funny, Baltimore has supposedly "tough" gun laws. Seems to be working well for the criminals .......


Let's add Queen Ann and watch 'em go crazy:

In a comprehensive study of all public multiple shooting incidents in America between 1977 and 1999, economists John Lott and Bill Landes found that the only public policy that reduced both the incidence and casualties of such shootings were concealed-carry laws. Not only are there 60 percent fewer gun massacres after states adopt concealed-carry laws, but the death and injury rate of such rampages are reduced by 80 percent.
From an Ann Coulter column, January 29, 2009

Lott eh?

:lol:
 
48 people ? That's a little over a month in the small city of Baltimore. Funny, Baltimore has supposedly "tough" gun laws. Seems to be working well for the criminals .......

Once again the confusion sets in.

Criminals don't give a fuck about "gun laws" - have you noticed that? I have. And they don't give a fuck because.....wait for it....they're criminals! :lol:

But firearms control laws aren't about crime control, they're about harm minimisation from the private ownership/use/possession of firearms.

"...firearm makes it easier for a mugger to do his job. That, of course, is only true if the mugger's potential victims are mostly disarmed either by choice or by legislative fiat--it has no validity when most of a mugger's potential marks are armed. People who argue for the banning of arms ask for automatic rule by the young, the strong, and the many, and that's the exact opposite of a civilized society. A mugger, even an armed one, can only make a successful living in a society where the state has granted him a force monopoly."

the munchkin wrangler.: why the gun is civilization.

What has that go to do with my point?
 
Lots of the following has been known for a long time, but the update from Australia is interesting. The Switzerland info really nails things down and it has been that way there for decades.





A LITTLE GUN HISTORY

In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
------------------------------

In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 Million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
------------------------------

Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, a total of 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
------------------------------

China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated
------------------------------

Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
---- ------------- -------------

Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
------------------------------

Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million educated people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
-----------------------------

Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century after gun control was established: 56 million.
------------------------------

It has now been 12 months since gun owners in Australia were forced by new law to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed by their own Government, a program costing Australia taxpayers more than $500 million dollars. The first year results are now in:

List of 7 items:

Australia-wide, homicides are up 3.2 percent.

Australia-wide, assaults are up 8.6 percent.

Australia-wide, armed robberies are up 44 percent (yes, 44 percent)!

In the state of Victoria alone, homicides with firearms are now up 300 percent. Note that while the law-abiding citizens turned them in, the criminals did not, and criminals still possess their guns!

While figures over the previous 25 years showed a steady decrease in armed robbery with firearms, this has changed drastically upward in the past 12 months, since criminals now are guaranteed that their prey is unarmed.

There has also been a dramatic increase in break-ins and assaults of the ELDERLY. Australian politicians are at a loss to explain how public safety has decreased, after such monumental effort, and expense was expended in successfully ridding Australian society of guns. The Australian experience and the other historical facts above prove it.

You won't see this data on the US evening news, or hear politicians disseminating this information.

Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun-control laws adversely affect only the law-abiding citizens.

Take note my fellow Americans, before it's too late!

The next time someone talks in favor of gun control, please remind them of this history lesson.

With guns, we are 'citizens'. Without them, we are 'subjects'.

During WWII , one reason the Japanese decided not to invade America because they knew most Americans were ARMED!

If you value your freedom, please spread this anti-gun control message to all of your friends.


The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield, and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental.
SWITZERLAND ISSUES EVERY HOUSEHOLD A GUN! SWITZERLAND 'S GOVERNMENT TRAINS EVERY ADULT THEY ISSUE A RIFLE.
SWITZERLAND HAS THE LOWEST GUN RELATED CRIME RATE OF ANY CIVILIZED COUNTRY IN THE WORLD!!!
IT'S A NO BRAINER! DON'T LET OUR GOVERNMENT WASTE MILLIONS OF OUR TAX DOLLARS IN AN EFFORT TO MAKE ALL LAW ABIDING CITIZENS AN EASY TARGET.

I'm a firm believer of the 2nd Amendment!
If you are too, please forward.

The Australian statistics are crap. As I noted elsewhere this bullshit has been peddled around the net since about 1997. It should die.

Hey Roo where are you stats

Where did you get that crap from anyway? And where did the crap get its info from? Stump it up before you ask me to do your work for you. Posting a piece of crap that has been around for years isn't proving a damn thing.
 
48 people ? That's a little over a month in the small city of Baltimore. Funny, Baltimore has supposedly "tough" gun laws. Seems to be working well for the criminals .......

Once again the confusion sets in.

Criminals don't give a fuck about "gun laws" - have you noticed that? I have. And they don't give a fuck because.....wait for it....they're criminals! :lol:

But firearms control laws aren't about crime control, they're about harm minimisation from the private ownership/use/possession of firearms.

Once again DUMB ASS. In America EVERY Gun Control law is SOLD as CRIME CONTROL. And YOUR current laws on guns were ALSO sold as CRIME CONTROL. Already linked you twice to the article that proves YOUR current law was billed as crime prevention after a shooting spree that left 35 dead.

First things first. Fuck you too.

Now, you know why your politicians are forced to lie to you? Because of the 2nd Amendment, that's why. There is a right to firearms in your constitution. That means that if that right is going to be abrogated in any way the legislation has to be carefully crafted so as not to fail that test (eg gun ban in DC). But if the legislation is to get passed it has to be camouflaged as being about crime control. People are shit scared of crime - and rightly so - and anything that seeks to reduce crime must, on the face of it - be a good thing. The truth is it's a load of bollocks but you and your legislators are stuck with it because your constitution has been interpreted as giving everyone the right to own/use/possess a firearm.
 
What the hey? Australians don't like American crime or gun control. Somehow, who cares? It's touching, but I doubt your typical Aussie gives a care, either way.

Your right

Most Australians think Americans are fucking stupid for putting up with the 2nd Amendment. I don't think that way.

Most Australians think America is crime ridden and totally dangerous. It isn't, I know that.

I don't care about US firearms control laws, that's not my business but I do have an interest in the topic of firearms control laws. Get it? I don't give a flying fuck about your situation. You can resolve it but you choose not to but I don't care. I do care when I see absolute bullshit peddled about crime and firearms control laws in my country and I do care about the crap that people post about firearms control laws in general.
 
The Australian statistics are crap. As I noted elsewhere this bullshit has been peddled around the net since about 1997. It should die.

"Since Australia banned private ownership of most guns in 1996, crime has risen dramatically on that continent, prompting critics of U.S. gun control efforts to issue new warnings of what life in America could be like if Congress ever bans firearms.
After Australian lawmakers passed widespread gun bans, owners were forced to surrender about 650,000 weapons, which were later slated for destruction, according to statistics from the Australian Sporting Shooters Association.

The bans were not limited to so-called "assault" weapons or military-type firearms, but also to .22 rifles and shotguns. The effort cost the Australian government about $500 million, said association representative Keith Tidswell.

Though lawmakers responsible for passing the ban promised a safer country, the nation's crime statistics tell a different story: "

Crime up Down Under

Thanks for the link.

I recognise it, I've read it before. I remember Keith Tidswell being referenced.

Where the article falls down completely is in trying to link the firearms control laws with an increase in crime. There's no causation at work.

Tidswell was rightly cranky with Howard for his populist crap after Port Arthur. It was a stupid, disgraceful and typically populist move by Howard. The ASSA was right in protesting the stupidity.

But you have to understand this country and crime to see that the attempt to link rates of crime with the two stupid gun buybacks is futile. We don't have a high ownership of firearms. We don't have CCW laws because of an everyday fear of crime. We have firearms for sport, not for self defence.

I could go on and on but I'll leave it at that.
 
The Australian statistics are crap. As I noted elsewhere this bullshit has been peddled around the net since about 1997. It should die.

"Since Australia banned private ownership of most guns in 1996, crime has risen dramatically on that continent, prompting critics of U.S. gun control efforts to issue new warnings of what life in America could be like if Congress ever bans firearms.
After Australian lawmakers passed widespread gun bans, owners were forced to surrender about 650,000 weapons, which were later slated for destruction, according to statistics from the Australian Sporting Shooters Association.

The bans were not limited to so-called "assault" weapons or military-type firearms, but also to .22 rifles and shotguns. The effort cost the Australian government about $500 million, said association representative Keith Tidswell.

Though lawmakers responsible for passing the ban promised a safer country, the nation's crime statistics tell a different story: "

Crime up Down Under

Thanks for the link.

I recognise it, I've read it before. I remember Keith Tidswell being referenced.

Where the article falls down completely is in trying to link the firearms control laws with an increase in crime. There's no causation at work.

Tidswell was rightly cranky with Howard for his populist crap after Port Arthur. It was a stupid, disgraceful and typically populist move by Howard. The ASSA was right in protesting the stupidity.

But you have to understand this country and crime to see that the attempt to link rates of crime with the two stupid gun buybacks is futile. We don't have a high ownership of firearms. We don't have CCW laws because of an everyday fear of crime. We have firearms for sport, not for self defence.

I could go on and on but I'll leave it at that.

Ya, no link to the fact no guns made crime easier. No link to the gun grab that violent crimes and murders went way up. No link to the loss of the right to own guns to the rapid increase of home invasions and burglary. Sure thing Mate.

And once again, your last draconian laws were in DIRECT response to a shooting spree that left 35 dead and the claim the Government made was that banning guns WOULD reduce crime. The laws were touted as CRIME CONTROL.
 
Ya, no link to the fact no guns made crime easier. No link to the gun grab that violent crimes and murders went way up. No link to the loss of the right to own guns to the rapid increase of home invasions and burglary. Sure thing Mate.

And once again, your last draconian laws were in DIRECT response to a shooting spree that left 35 dead and the claim the Government made was that banning guns WOULD reduce crime. The laws were touted as CRIME CONTROL.

You're on. I've got a few things to do but I accept your challenge.
 
OK, fellows, we have a problem. Another couple of months like that, and you will see some pretty strict gun control laws. Laws approved of by the majority of the people of the nation.

So you really need to come up with some answers other than foaming at the mouth rants about your freedoms.

If you are proposing an all out ban....the recent number of gun deaths would pale in comparison to what you would see if an all out ban hit. I bet the body bag factory would be in 24/7 operation.

These are harsh words.....and you'd be better served having a gun before trying to take one. But of course , you'd have someone else do you're dealings for you though....like a true pussy.
 
Last edited:
The problem with right wingers is they can't put their finger on why there is so much violence in our nation with guns.


The truth IS that guns don't kill people. People kill people. Conservatives will agree.


The other truth is that our CULTURE is the reason we have such gun violence. We are the most aggressive nation in the world right now on the global stage. Why shouldn't it be the same at home?


How are citizens supposed to watch their government bomb the crap out of apartment buildings with women and children inside (yes, this happens) and not feel like we get to do that too.



Our government leads by example.


Just ask the Indians.

WE are the most aggressive nation on the global stage? Really? We live in a world where nations openly support terrorists and people whose stated goal is to either kill or enslave all Jews, warlords cause starvation, genocide, and devastation for power, and rogue nations try to develop nuclear weapons in order to threaten, if not destroy, others. Meanwhile, the big, bad, aggressive United States runs itself broke and ragged trying to feed and protect people and can't even muster the stones to stop a pissant country like Mexico from actually ENCOURAGING its people to violate our border at will. Our elected leaders run all over the world apologizing to everyone they can find like a bunch of simpering schoolgirls, and nations that engage in slave trafficking sit on the UN Human Rights Committee and sneer at us. But WE are horrible and aggressive. Do you also describe people as "aggressive" if they step in and stop their neighbor from beating his wife and kid to death?

Name for me, please, the last nation the US conquered and subjugated for imperialist purposes.
 
OK, fellows, we have a problem. Another couple of months like that, and you will see some pretty strict gun control laws. Laws approved of by the majority of the people of the nation.

So you really need to come up with some answers other than foaming at the mouth rants about your freedoms.

I knew this would happen when Obama took office...
 

Forum List

Back
Top