51% Of American Muslims Want Sharia... (NOT in All Caps Now..)

[NYcarbineer]

99% of RWnuts think America is a Christian nation, and want the laws to be adjusted accordingly...

...aka the Christian version of Sharia.

Christians do not call for the murder of non Christians,

Neither does sharia. Run along.

BS, the Koran calls for the elimination of non muslim infidels. sharia is the law of the Koran, you run along, boy

Do you know what is sharia?

The Bible called for genocide.

I thought you were a Christian, you don't know the difference between the old and new Testament and what that's supposed to mean to Christians, Jake? I'm not a Christian and I know that.

Anyway, we have Millions of Muslims doing that today and no Christians. And you don't see the difference?

Are you sure the true Christians are the ones who throw the Old Testament under the bus?

 

[NYcarbineer]

99% of RWnuts think America is a Christian nation, and want the laws to be adjusted accordingly...

...aka the Christian version of Sharia.

Christians do not call for the murder of non Christians,

GW Bush murdered tens of thousands in Iraq.

And btw, would you like me to repost some of the names of USMB posters who have called for nuking Mecca?

I'm guessing some of them think they're Christians.

people

Neither does sharia. Run along.

BS, the Koran calls for the elimination of non muslim infidels. sharia is the law of the Koran, you run along, boy

Do you know what is sharia?

The Bible called for genocide.

Jesus changed that. He taught love and tolerance

Did he teach that homosexuals should be treated as second class citizens, because that has certainly been the Christian conservative view for as long as there have been Christian conservatives.

no sick person should as a second class citizen, homosexuality is a

GW Bush murdered tens of thousands in Iraq.

And btw, would you like me to repost some of the names of USMB posters who have called for nuking Mecca?

I'm guessing some of them think they're Christians.

people

Do you know what is sharia?

The Bible called for genocide.

Jesus changed that. He taught love and tolerance

How many self-identified Christians love their enemies?

hate the sin, love the sinner. the vast majority believe that

That my friend is the biggest lie ever told on USMB.

Cite me the Christian posters who ever proclaimed their love for Osama Bin Laden.

stupid question, move on child

It was your claim, support it with evidence. If the vast majority of Christians love the sinner, then the vast majority must have loved Bin Laden.

Or, they must love the ISIS fighters.

Fuck, Christian conservatives can't even love the innocent Muslims, let alone the guilty.

 

[Picaro]

Do you know what is sharia?

The Bible called for genocide.

Hey Jake, since you're now a 'Bible Scholar n Theologian N Stuff', can you kindly type out by hand the entire book that 'call for genocide' is in, so we can all see the context and why it's in that particular point in that book, instead of, say, God tattooing it on your forehead, for instance?

 

[JakeStarkey]

99% of RWnuts think America is a Christian nation, and want the laws to be adjusted accordingly...

...aka the Christian version of Sharia.

Christians do not call for the murder of non Christians,

Neither does sharia. Run along.

BS, the Koran calls for the elimination of non muslim infidels. sharia is the law of the Koran, you run along, boy

Do you know what is sharia?

The Bible called for genocide.

I thought you were a Christian, you don't know the difference between the old and new Testament and what that's supposed to mean to Christians, Jake? I'm not a Christian and I know that.

Anyway, we have Millions of Muslims doing that today and no Christians. And you don't see the difference?

I am not concerned what a shallow thinker like you perceives, other than to make sure your shallowness is noted.

I read the writings of Father Abraham in the three great religions regularly. I understand them; they are no mystery.

That you don’t get it is obvious.

 

[JakeStarkey]

No sane American wants the country's laws run on the evangelicals' interpretation of what the Bible means.

 

[Picaro]

No sane American wants the country's laws run on the evangelicals' interpretation of what the Bible means.

No sane American takes you seriously, either, so how is that going to work out in your delusions?

Try removing all the 'ebul evangelical stuff' from our Declaration of Independence, Constitution, and bodies of Federal and state laws, and let's see what's left that hasn't been 'influenced' by Xians.

 

[deltex1]

So why are we importing the tool of our own nation's demise?

Welcome to Obama's 'Fundamental Change'! Unfortunately there are a LOT of Americans (Liberals) whose light hasn't come on yet.

Obama admittedly was / has:

- Sired by an Anti-American, anti-colonialist father who wanted the US eliminated as a world power and influence...

- Tutored by Communist Frank Marshall Davis...

- Studied Socialist Saul Alinsky - even quoted him during an Inauguration speech

- Mentored for decades by a hate-spewing racist anti-American 'pastor',

- Friends with a domestic terrorist who bombed his own country and killed cops

- Declared he would stand with Muslims if the political winds blow ugly

- Declared the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam (Convert to Islam or die, as in no future for YOU...sound familiar)

- Armed the terrorist group the Muslim Brotherhood

- Armed Al Qaeda

- Dragged the US into the middle of a civil war between a dictator we put into power - WHO WAS JUST BEGINNING TO HELP US COMBAT TERRORISTS IN NTHRN AFRCIA - and Al Qaeida, perpetrators of 9/11/01 and 9/11/12, to help Al Qaeida kill Qadaffi and take over their own nation as a safe haven....all this at a time when Obama was declaring Al Qaeida was on the run!

- Supplied, Armed, Trained, & Protected ISIS, dropped leaflets to them, after the Paris attack, to warn them that French and Russian bombers were coming to drop bombs on the ISIS Black Market oil facilities Obama was protecting that funded 50% of their terrorist activities - to include the Paris attack (can you say 'aiding and abetting the enemy'?!)

- Mocked Americans over their concerns for our national security and their safety, even after he admitted his 'vetting process' was virtually non-existent - claiming all they had to fear after the Paris attacks were 'widows and orphans' - only to have the terrorist to whom his administration gave a visa murder 12 Americans in California

Obama has sacrificed American lives for his personal political benefit / re-election. He has defended Islam by blaming a video for the needless murder of 4 Americans, by calling a terrorist attack a case of 'workplace violence', by sending out his AG to threaten Americans with punishment if they exercised their right to Free Speech, by having his DHS openly declare Conservatives (who he called his 'enemies' and whom he used his IRS to target) greater threats than Islamic extremists, & has lectured the very same Americans he has bullied and vilified who are being targeted by Radical Islamists.


Obama has failed to protect Iraq, a nation our nation's soldiers had liberated at great cost, by allowing ISIS to freely enter Iraq without opposition, while he supplied/armed/trained/protected them and called them a 'JV Team'.



Despite admitting his vetting process is virtually non-existent...

Despite his FBI already spread beyond the breaking point investigating 1,000 cases involving ISIS threats in the US...

Despite ISIS declaring they are going to infiltrate the refugees...

Despite his CIA warning ISIS IS infiltrating the 'refugees' coming in...

Despite more successful terrorist attacks having been carried out under his administration than any in our nation's history...

Despite the American body count directly tied to his policies and actions Obama CONTINUES to bring in hundreds of un-vetted Muslims from a civil war-torn nation - a war between terrorists Obama has supported and a dictator - that is the home base for ISIS!


Arizona, Tennessee, Texas, California, Benghazi, Florida...while the bodies keep piling up Obama's DHS is declaring the enemy is AMERICANS and works to 'ban' the words 'Jihad' and 'Sharia' as Obama refuses to say the words 'Radical Islam' and 'Islamic extremists' because 'it means we are at war with all of Islam'.


Why is he still President? Nothing to see here...move along.


You are being redirected...

All caps is sooooooo offensive...worse than beheading.

 

[NYcarbineer]

GW Bush murdered tens of thousands in Iraq.

And btw, would you like me to repost some of the names of USMB posters who have called for nuking Mecca?

I'm guessing some of them think they're Christians.

people

Do you know what is sharia?

The Bible called for genocide.

Jesus changed that. He taught love and tolerance

How many self-identified Christians love their enemies?

------------------------- what a silly question with an unknowable answer Carbineer .

If you or anyone else here who's a Christian simply answered it, we'd know that much.

Go ahead, tell us how much you love the Muslim terrorists.

------------------------------- you just keep getting sillier and sillier Carbineer .

Did Jesus say to love your enemies or not?

 

[JakeStarkey]

No sane American wants the country's laws run on the evangelicals' interpretation of what the Bible means.

No sane American takes you seriously, either, so how is that going to work out in your delusions?Try removing all the 'ebul evangelical stuff' from our Declaration of Independence, Constitution, and bodies of Federal and state laws, and let's see what's left that hasn't been 'influenced' by Xians.

The Declaration and Constitution were written primarily by Episcopalians, Quakers, Congregationalists, and deists. The only "evangelical" that you could possibly define in your presentist terms would be Patrick Henry. You truly are ignorant about American history, as well as immoral when you present.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Do you know what is sharia?

The Bible called for genocide.

Hey Jake, since you're now a 'Bible Scholar n Theologian N Stuff', can you kindly type out by hand the entire book that 'call for genocide' is in, so we can all see the context and why it's in that particular point in that book, instead of, say, God tattooing it on your forehead, for instance?

Samuel. God ordered the Israelites to commit a genocide of the Amalekites.

 

[Picaro]

No sane American wants the country's laws run on the evangelicals' interpretation of what the Bible means.

No sane American takes you seriously, either, so how is that going to work out in your delusions?Try removing all the 'ebul evangelical stuff' from our Declaration of Independence, Constitution, and bodies of Federal and state laws, and let's see what's left that hasn't been 'influenced' by Xians.

The Declaration and Constitution were written primarily by Episcopalians, Quakers, Congregationalists, and deists. The only "evangelical" that you could possibly define in your presentist terms would be Patrick Henry. You truly are ignorant about American history, as well as immoral when you present.

Wrong again, Jake; see, you know nothing about American history, either. They did 'write it down', but the primary influences were those ebul Xian evangelicals who led the First Great Awakening. They also had the greatest influence on the Bill of Rights. The First Amendment is itself taken directly from Baptists, it's one of their own unique founding principles, and the rest are derivative of ebul Xian influences, not to mention the whole concept of 'all men are created equal' is also very Xian.

The reason the above sect's members were the ones 'writing it down' is because their state had state religions, and many continued to have state religions for several more decades as well Massachusetts was t he last change their state Constitution, in 1833.

The 'Deist' claim is also dishonest as well. The one guy who claimed to be a 'deist' was in fact a Christian. Can you guess who?

You still haven't gotten back to us on that 'genocide' thing. Are you having trouble locating that?

 

[NYcarbineer]

No sane American wants the country's laws run on the evangelicals' interpretation of what the Bible means.

No sane American takes you seriously, either, so how is that going to work out in your delusions?Try removing all the 'ebul evangelical stuff' from our Declaration of Independence, Constitution, and bodies of Federal and state laws, and let's see what's left that hasn't been 'influenced' by Xians.

The Declaration and Constitution were written primarily by Episcopalians, Quakers, Congregationalists, and deists. The only "evangelical" that you could possibly define in your presentist terms would be Patrick Henry. You truly are ignorant about American history, as well as immoral when you present.

Wrong again, Jake; see, you know nothing about American history, either. They did 'write it down', but the primary influences were those ebul Xian evangelicals who led the First Great Awakening. They also had the greatest influence on the Bill of Rights. The First Amendment is itself taken directly from Baptists, it's one of their own unique founding principles, and the rest are derivative of ebul Xian influences, not to mention the whole concept of 'all men are created equal' is also very Xian.

The reason the above sect's members were the ones 'writing it down' is because their state had state religions, and many continued to have state religions for several more decades as well Massachusetts was t he last change their state Constitution, in 1833.

The 'Deist' claim is also dishonest as well. The one guy who claimed to be a 'deist' was in fact a Christian. Can you guess who?

You still haven't gotten back to us on that 'genocide' thing. Are you having trouble locating that?

The genocide was posted.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

99% of RWnuts think America is a Christian nation, and want the laws to be adjusted accordingly...

...aka the Christian version of Sharia.

You are out of your mind, providing there was one to begin with.

99% of the conservative Christians on this board defended Kim Davis when she tried to use her religion to assert a right to circumvent the Constitution.

That is how it goes with those people.

Businesses have a right to refuse business to anyone for any reason. That's not circumventing the constitution, that's you apparently not knowing what Constitutional rights are. Nobody has a right to force a business to serve them. If they refuse you, go to their competitor.

You are ignorant on the subject. Businesses cannot refuse to serve anyone for any reason.

That can, so long as they aren't owned by the government. In some cases, they're not allowed to tell you what that reason is, but they ARE allowed to refuse service to anyone for any reason. They usually don't, because they'd lose customers to their competitors, but they're allowed.

 

[kaz]

Christians do not call for the murder of non Christians,

Neither does sharia. Run along.

BS, the Koran calls for the elimination of non muslim infidels. sharia is the law of the Koran, you run along, boy

Do you know what is sharia?

The Bible called for genocide.

I thought you were a Christian, you don't know the difference between the old and new Testament and what that's supposed to mean to Christians, Jake? I'm not a Christian and I know that.

Anyway, we have Millions of Muslims doing that today and no Christians. And you don't see the difference?

I am not concerned what a shallow thinker like you perceives, other than to make sure your shallowness is noted.

I read the writings of Father Abraham in the three great religions regularly. I understand them; they are no mystery.

That you don’t get it is obvious.

It's funny how you repeatedly can't address the points made by a "shallow thinker" like me. But a good question to ask in church this week would be the difference between the old and new testaments. Hint, they aren't the same to Christians ...

 

[Pumpkin Row]

Neither does sharia. Run along.

BS, the Koran calls for the elimination of non muslim infidels. sharia is the law of the Koran, you run along, boy

Do you know what is sharia?

The Bible called for genocide.

I thought you were a Christian, you don't know the difference between the old and new Testament and what that's supposed to mean to Christians, Jake? I'm not a Christian and I know that.

Anyway, we have Millions of Muslims doing that today and no Christians. And you don't see the difference?

I am not concerned what a shallow thinker like you perceives, other than to make sure your shallowness is noted.

I read the writings of Father Abraham in the three great religions regularly. I understand them; they are no mystery.

That you don’t get it is obvious.

It's funny how you repeatedly can't address the points made by a "shallow thinker" like me. But a good question to ask in church this week would be the difference between the old and new testaments. Hint, they aren't the same to Christians ...

Liberals like to ignore that, so they can bash Christians more easily.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Picaro is stupid: not in intellect but that (1) he won't learn and (2) he thinks others are not as smart as is he. He has merely confused terms and periods, as do the ignorant like him.

He simply ignores that’s the great number of members at the Convention were not members of evangelical denominations. They were Quaker, Episcopal Congregational, one Catholic, and a confused John Jay, supposedly an “evangelical” the which no one can prove. He can’t refute the truth of this.

The first great awakening was not evangelical in the 2nd great awakening sense in which he tries to define it. The second began more than a dozen years after the Constitutional Convention. The first awakening was about Christian conversion and organizational realignment, not the 'evangelical awakening' that Picaro incorrectly thinks.

Thomas Jefferson and the Baptists occurred AFTER the Convention, a member of which Jefferson was not. Jefferson was clearly a deist, as his statement of being a Christian in a sect of one. His Jefferson bible cleaned out all the miraculous stuff the Baptists and other evangelicals dearly loved and clearly stated that TJ loved the morals of Jesus. There is no statement of Christian acceptance of Jesus as Lord and Savior.

Ethan Allan was a deist when not being agnostic.

Benjamin Franklin was a poly-theist when not being a deist.

Madison was a very weak Christian (at best) who held the evangelicals in horror.

If Picaro tried this argument in college, the professor would flunk it immediately and tell Picaro not to speak again until the reading and research were done.
Picaro is stupid: not in intellect but that (1) he won't learn and (2) he thinks others are not as smart as is he. He has merely confused terms and periods, as do the ignorant like him.

He simply ignores that’s the great number of members at the Convention were not members of evangelical denominations. They were Quaker, Episcopal Congregational, one Catholic, and a confused John Jay, supposedly an “evangelical” the which no one can prove. He can’t refute the truth of this.

The first great awakening was not evangelical in the 2nd great awakening sense in which he tries to define it. The second began more than a dozen years after the Constitutional Convention. The first awakening was about Christian conversion and organizational realignment, not the 'evangelical awakening' that Picaro incorrectly thinks.

Thomas Jefferson and the Baptists occurred AFTER the Convention, a member of which Jefferson was not. Jefferson was clearly a deist, as his statement of being a Christian in a sect of one. His Jefferson bible cleaned out all the miraculous stuff the Baptists and other evangelicals dearly loved and clearly stated that TJ loved the morals of Jesus. There is no statement of Christian acceptance of Jesus as Lord and Savior.

Ethan Allan was a deist when not being agnostic.

Benjamin Franklin was a poly-theist when not being a deist.

Madison was a very weak Christian (at best) who held the evangelicals in horror.

If Picaro tried this argument in college, the professor would flunk it immediately and tell Picaro not to speak again until the reading and research were done.

 

[The VOR]

Neither does sharia. Run along.

BS, the Koran calls for the elimination of non muslim infidels. sharia is the law of the Koran, you run along, boy

Do you know what is sharia?

The Bible called for genocide.

I thought you were a Christian, you don't know the difference between the old and new Testament and what that's supposed to mean to Christians, Jake? I'm not a Christian and I know that.

Anyway, we have Millions of Muslims doing that today and no Christians. And you don't see the difference?

I am not concerned what a shallow thinker like you perceives, other than to make sure your shallowness is noted.

I read the writings of Father Abraham in the three great religions regularly. I understand them; they are no mystery.

That you don’t get it is obvious.

It's funny how you repeatedly can't address the points made by a "shallow thinker" like me. But a good question to ask in church this week would be the difference between the old and new testaments. Hint, they aren't the same to Christians ...

I thought is was all god's word, no?

So what you are saying then is that the old testament is bullshit to be ignored by christians --- even though it MAY BE god's word --- and the new testament is the real stuff?

 

[Pumpkin Row]

Picaro is stupid: not in intellect but that (1) he won't learn and (2) he thinks others are not as smart as is he. He has merely confused terms and periods, as do the ignorant like him.

He simply ignores that’s the great number of members at the Convention were not members of evangelical denominations. They were Quaker, Episcopal Congregational, one Catholic, and a confused John Jay, supposedly an “evangelical” the which no one can prove. He can’t refute the truth of this.

The first great awakening was not evangelical in the 2nd great awakening sense in which he tries to define it. The second began more than a dozen years after the Constitutional Convention. The first awakening was about Christian conversion and organizational realignment, not the 'evangelical awakening' that Picaro incorrectly thinks.

Thomas Jefferson and the Baptists occurred AFTER the Convention, a member of which Jefferson was not. Jefferson was clearly a deist, as his statement of being a Christian in a sect of one. His Jefferson bible cleaned out all the miraculous stuff the Baptists and other evangelicals dearly loved and clearly stated that TJ loved the morals of Jesus. There is no statement of Christian acceptance of Jesus as Lord and Savior.

Ethan Allan was a deist when not being agnostic.

Benjamin Franklin was a poly-theist when not being a deist.

Madison was a very weak Christian (at best) who held the evangelicals in horror.

If Picaro tried this argument in college, the professor would flunk it immediately and tell Picaro not to speak again until the reading and research were done.
Picaro is stupid: not in intellect but that (1) he won't learn and (2) he thinks others are not as smart as is he. He has merely confused terms and periods, as do the ignorant like him.

He simply ignores that’s the great number of members at the Convention were not members of evangelical denominations. They were Quaker, Episcopal Congregational, one Catholic, and a confused John Jay, supposedly an “evangelical” the which no one can prove. He can’t refute the truth of this.

The first great awakening was not evangelical in the 2nd great awakening sense in which he tries to define it. The second began more than a dozen years after the Constitutional Convention. The first awakening was about Christian conversion and organizational realignment, not the 'evangelical awakening' that Picaro incorrectly thinks.

Thomas Jefferson and the Baptists occurred AFTER the Convention, a member of which Jefferson was not. Jefferson was clearly a deist, as his statement of being a Christian in a sect of one. His Jefferson bible cleaned out all the miraculous stuff the Baptists and other evangelicals dearly loved and clearly stated that TJ loved the morals of Jesus. There is no statement of Christian acceptance of Jesus as Lord and Savior.

Ethan Allan was a deist when not being agnostic.

Benjamin Franklin was a poly-theist when not being a deist.

Madison was a very weak Christian (at best) who held the evangelicals in horror.

If Picaro tried this argument in college, the professor would flunk it immediately and tell Picaro not to speak again until the reading and research were done.

That post is twice as long as it needed to be.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Picaro is stupid: not in intellect but that (1) he won't learn and (2) he thinks others are not as smart as is he. He has merely confused terms and periods, as do the ignorant like him.

He simply ignores that’s the great number of members at the Convention were not members of evangelical denominations. They were Quaker, Episcopal Congregational, one Catholic, and a confused John Jay, supposedly an “evangelical” the which no one can prove. He can’t refute the truth of this.

The first great awakening was not evangelical in the 2nd great awakening sense in which he tries to define it. The second began more than a dozen years after the Constitutional Convention. The first awakening was about Christian conversion and organizational realignment, not the 'evangelical awakening' that Picaro incorrectly thinks.

Thomas Jefferson and the Baptists occurred AFTER the Convention, a member of which Jefferson was not. Jefferson was clearly a deist, as his statement of being a Christian in a sect of one. His Jefferson bible cleaned out all the miraculous stuff the Baptists and other evangelicals dearly loved and clearly stated that TJ loved the morals of Jesus. There is no statement of Christian acceptance of Jesus as Lord and Savior.

Ethan Allan was a deist when not being agnostic.

Benjamin Franklin was a poly-theist when not being a deist.

Madison was a very weak Christian (at best) who held the evangelicals in horror.

If Picaro tried this argument in college, the professor would flunk it immediately and tell Picaro not to speak again until the reading and research were done.
Picaro is stupid: not in intellect but that (1) he won't learn and (2) he thinks others are not as smart as is he. He has merely confused terms and periods, as do the ignorant like him.

He simply ignores that’s the great number of members at the Convention were not members of evangelical denominations. They were Quaker, Episcopal Congregational, one Catholic, and a confused John Jay, supposedly an “evangelical” the which no one can prove. He can’t refute the truth of this.

The first great awakening was not evangelical in the 2nd great awakening sense in which he tries to define it. The second began more than a dozen years after the Constitutional Convention. The first awakening was about Christian conversion and organizational realignment, not the 'evangelical awakening' that Picaro incorrectly thinks.

Thomas Jefferson and the Baptists occurred AFTER the Convention, a member of which Jefferson was not. Jefferson was clearly a deist, as his statement of being a Christian in a sect of one. His Jefferson bible cleaned out all the miraculous stuff the Baptists and other evangelicals dearly loved and clearly stated that TJ loved the morals of Jesus. There is no statement of Christian acceptance of Jesus as Lord and Savior.

Ethan Allan was a deist when not being agnostic.

Benjamin Franklin was a poly-theist when not being a deist.

Madison was a very weak Christian (at best) who held the evangelicals in horror.

If Picaro tried this argument in college, the professor would flunk it immediately and tell Picaro not to speak again until the reading and research were done.

That post is twice as long as it needed to be.

Because Picaro is four timesstupider than necessary.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

BS, the Koran calls for the elimination of non muslim infidels. sharia is the law of the Koran, you run along, boy

Do you know what is sharia?

The Bible called for genocide.

I thought you were a Christian, you don't know the difference between the old and new Testament and what that's supposed to mean to Christians, Jake? I'm not a Christian and I know that.

Anyway, we have Millions of Muslims doing that today and no Christians. And you don't see the difference?

I am not concerned what a shallow thinker like you perceives, other than to make sure your shallowness is noted.

I read the writings of Father Abraham in the three great religions regularly. I understand them; they are no mystery.

That you don’t get it is obvious.

It's funny how you repeatedly can't address the points made by a "shallow thinker" like me. But a good question to ask in church this week would be the difference between the old and new testaments. Hint, they aren't the same to Christians ...

I thought is was all god's word, no?

So what you are saying then is that the old testament is bullshit to be ignored by christians --- even though it MAY BE god's word --- and the new testament is the real stuff?

It's like everyone who hates Christians reads from the same handbook. No, the old Testament was rules for Jews, as they were selected as God's people for spreading "the word", when they began bringing the word to the Gentiles and the final sacrifice was made, God made a new covenant. Christians do not follow Moses' law, because they're not Jews. Nothing about the Old Testament is 'BS', the rules are just no longer followed because of Christ's sacrifice.