bendog
Diamond Member
And Kasich would lose just like Romney and McCain did. RINO'S are not wanted. They achieve NOTHING because they are nothing but right leaning democrats. The people had enough and have decided to either take back our country via a populist or destroy the RINO party trying to do so.Fixed you for good. Tired of the trolling from you.I understand they were all dancing on the rooftop of an apartment building.
I "saw it on TV".
btw OP --- learn how apostrophes work.
I don't think he loses as big as typical republicans do....odd how a Republican can win a LANDSLIDE victory for reelection as governor in NJ but not a presidential race...He's going to lose New Jersey bigly, but interesting story. Thanks
Trump to Indian community: We are going to be best friends
Thank you. Yes its very very telling. I will keep it up. It destroys the lefts illusions and that pisses them off.Of course they can't show the generally top of their class intellectual Hindus, it would spoil the dumb hillbillys image they painted on the Trump supporters.
These posts you are starting are great, because they are very-very telling of how manipulative and controling through such image propaganda these progressives are.
Kasich would be leading Hillary as much as she leads Trump. This was our chance to end obamacare, but 40% of the gop primary voters opted for reality tv.
No. Romney got 47%plus, and that beats Hillary.
Invalid comparison. In 2012 Gary Johnson and Jill Stein combined didn't even pull 1½% of the vote.
Maybe it's an invalid comparison, but the basis for it was that if the GOP had not splintered to nominate Trump with 40% of the primary vote, then perhaps a mainstream candidate could get 47% and win this.
More likely, the gop might have one if they had a trade/immigration hardliner who then pivoted to the middle.
But, the reason I responded is that I've seen some polling suggesting the wind is going out of the libertarian sales. And that may be interesting.