Tresha91203
Platinum Member
The listening device is illegal. It is illegal to record audio of someone (within range of the child) without their expressed consent. The school cannot break the law. The school has no choice. The parent CAN attach a GPS device to her child as long as it has no audio capability, but the parent would not choose a legal device. Why did the parent refuse to use a legal GPS device? Why would the parent run to media complaining that the school would not allow her to use an illegal listening device? It is certainly less hassle to follow the law.
They are allowing it with the understanding she does not turn it on while he is at school.
Because she would be breaking the law if she did. GPS devices are dirt cheap. She could have just attached one to her child and avoided all the drama and fake outrage over not allowing illegal eavesdropping on innocent people. The school informed her of this and she ran to the media with half the story so she could play martyr.
Spy Mini GPS Tracking Finder Device Auto Car Pets Kids Motorcycle Tracker Track | eBay
The school provided one set of answers to the media and one to the mom.
It is a GPS device. He's 6. It's fake outrage to you.
Let that child wander from the school one time and slap 'em with a lawsuit so big lots of people can rethink this.
A GPS device is a GREAT idea, one I fully support. A listening device is not necessary. In fact, if activated, it is ILLEGAL. Why do you refuse to acknowledge that the whole issue is the illegal listening compatibility, not the tracking of her child? Instead of attaching a GPS device to her child to ensure his safety, she misrepresented the situation to cause division and manufactured anger. She was more interested in drama and 15 minutes of fame than legally protecting her child.