61% Americans Say Abortions Should Be Legal!

[Bob Blaylock]

I don't call a 1 week old fetus a baby

I don't call anyone who defends the savage, cold-blooded murder of innocent children, a human being.

Does that make it OK to kill you?

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Legally acceptable unless you want to reinstate slavery and remove the sovereignty people have over their own bodies

Slavery, just like abortion, was based on denying the very humanity of its victims, in order to deny them the most basic of human rights.

You're on the same side that the slavers were on.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Can it live independently? That could determine if it living...

Can a three-year-old live independently?

If you put a toddler out on the streets, to fend for himself, how well will he do?

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Have you seen this thread?

​

​

​

.

No.

Thanks for sharing.

For me, the moment happened when I recognized that I was flushing a human nervous system down the sink in the procedure room. I puked all over the place and quit my job.

I had believed the lie -- that it was just a blob of cells.

A human spine less than the length of my little finger made me puke. I can't imagine what kind of person could dismember a child as they vacuumed it out of its mother's womb.

.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Again... Something you believe...

Kids believe in Santa Claus....

You have been lied to by what ever church you go too...

You are now owned by the Libs..

.



In your cyber dreams, bot.




.

 

[jc456]

Can a three-year-old live independently?

If you put a toddler out on the streets, to fend for himself, how well will he do?

my earlier point.

 

[Blues Man]

I don't call anyone who defends the savage, cold-blooded murder of innocent children, a human being.

Does that make it OK to kill you?

I am by law defined as a person with rights so no.

FYI murder is the UNLAWFUL taking of a life. If abortion is not unlawful then by definition it is not murder.

 

[Blues Man]

Slavery, just like abortion, was based on denying the very humanity of its victims, in order to deny them the most basic of human rights.

You're on the same side that the slavers were on.

A fetus has no rights because a fetus is not yet a person. it is merely a potential person.

 

[jc456]

I am by law defined as a person with rights so no.

FYI murder is the UNLAWFUL taking of a life. If abortion is not unlawful then by definition it is not murder.

so is a baby.

 

[jc456]

A fetus has no rights because a fetus is not yet a person. it is merely a potential person.

sure it is, what else is it? a tree?

 

[NotfooledbyW]

It is a truly complicated decision.
My major distinction is that a woman pregnant for the 2nd time has made a decision to take a life that began as a fling. Her immediate gratification.
Now this is OK for the animal kingdom. But the majority of humans believe in responsibility.

NFBW You say Mr healthmvths #473 “It is a truly complicated decision” to take the life of one’s own fetus and that “….. the majority of humans believe in responsibility.”

LET’s say for the sake of argument that we are addressing abortions that are performed sooner than 13 weeks of gestation. In these cases what does it matter to you if an “irresponsible” couple make a decision to end an unwanted pregnancy. How would you know if their decision is complicated.

I do not think that it is complicated for the woman when it’s her body could be harmed if the government can force nine months of gestation on every woman who is not willing to take the risk.

Why do you think you know the decision is complicated?

 

[Failzero]

I call anyone killing babies baby killers. It's really simple.

And any Democrat is a Democommie

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Let the states decide, and yes people involved in abortions, regardless of their religious affiliations, are murderers when it's about "convenience".

 

[Mac1958]

Now the quite part Democrats don’t want to talk about out loud:

65% said abortion should usually be illegal in the second trimester, and 80% said that about the third trimester.

In other words, if Democrats are forced to fight for their actual position on abortion legislatively, they'll be demolished. Third-term abortions are an 80%-20% loser. Second-term abortions are a 65%-35% loser.

So... will Democrats fight for a federal abortion law promising people the right to an abortion in the first fifteen weeks of pregnancy? The period of time the current Mississippi law permits? The one they're claiming is a monstrosity that strips away women's rights?
BRING ON THE FIGHT!

AP-NORC poll: Most say restrict abortion after 1st trimester

A new poll shows a solid majority of Americans believe most abortions should be legal in the first three months of a woman’s pregnancy, but most say the procedure should usually be illegal in the second and third trimesters.

apnews.com

I'd guess that if the two fucked up parties came out and agreed on a 15-week limit, it would be very popular.

Neither end gets what it wants, but both ends bend. Like adults.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

A fetus has no rights because a fetus is not yet a person. it is merely a potential person.

.



I'll accept abortion when we can make it retroactive.




.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

FYI murder is the UNLAWFUL taking of a life. If abortion is not unlawful then by definition it is not murder.

So, no Jews or other Untermenschen were murdered in Germany and the territories controlled thereby, in the 1930s and 1940s, right?

No millions of people murdered in the Союз Советских Социалистических Республик under Stalin either.

No tens of millions murdered in the late 1950s to early 1960s under China's “Great Leap Forward”.

Nobody murdered in Cambodia under the regime of Pol Pot.

All of those happened in accordance with the laws and policies of the governments that were in power, there, and were therefore not “unlawful”, and by your degenerate logic, not murders.

To hide behind legalities in such a manner is exactly indicative of the sorts of cowardice, sociopathy, and intellectual dishonesty that have come to be among your defining traits.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

A fetus has no rights because a fetus is not yet a person. it is merely a potential person.

Just as black people had no rights in early America. Just as Jews and other Untermenschen had no rights in 1930s-1940s Germany.

 

[initforme]

In order to rid ourselves of abortion it will have to come from the promotion of contraception and NOT having kids People who have abortions never wanted kids in the first place. If a woman has any doubts at all about wanting kids she shouldn't have them until she is all in on them. So as a nation pushing and promoting birth control is of utmost importance.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Let the states decide, and yes people involved in abortions, regardless of their religious affiliations, are murderers when it's about "convenience".

Where is the line on “inconvenience”? If I kill you to take your wallet, and it contains $100, was that murder?

What if there is some way I can get a million dollars for killing you; is that murder?

What if it's a billion dollars?

How much do I have to be able to benefit from your death, for it to not be murder for me to intentionally take your life in order to gain that benefit?

 

[nomadic5]

I am by law defined as a person with rights so no.

FYI murder is the UNLAWFUL taking of a life. If abortion is not unlawful then by definition it is not murder.

FALSE

murder is the taking of an INNOCENT human life

The Nazis would agree w/ you though... I'm sure they used your line here as a defense at Nuremberg