Bob Blaylock
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #481
I don't call a 1 week old fetus a baby
I don't call anyone who defends the savage, cold-blooded murder of innocent children, a human being.
Does that make it OK to kill you?
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't call a 1 week old fetus a baby
Legally acceptable unless you want to reinstate slavery and remove the sovereignty people have over their own bodies
Can it live independently? That could determine if it living...
.Have you seen this thread?
.Again... Something you believe...
Kids believe in Santa Claus....
You have been lied to by what ever church you go too...
You are now owned by the Libs..
my earlier point.Can a three-year-old live independently?
If you put a toddler out on the streets, to fend for himself, how well will he do?
I don't call anyone who defends the savage, cold-blooded murder of innocent children, a human being.
Does that make it OK to kill you?
Slavery, just like abortion, was based on denying the very humanity of its victims, in order to deny them the most basic of human rights.
You're on the same side that the slavers were on.
so is a baby.I am by law defined as a person with rights so no.
FYI murder is the UNLAWFUL taking of a life. If abortion is not unlawful then by definition it is not murder.
sure it is, what else is it? a tree?A fetus has no rights because a fetus is not yet a person. it is merely a potential person.
It is a truly complicated decision.
My major distinction is that a woman pregnant for the 2nd time has made a decision to take a life that began as a fling. Her immediate gratification.
Now this is OK for the animal kingdom. But the majority of humans believe in responsibility.
And any Democrat is a DemocommieI call anyone killing babies baby killers. It's really simple.
I'd guess that if the two fucked up parties came out and agreed on a 15-week limit, it would be very popular.Now the quite part Democrats don’t want to talk about out loud:
65% said abortion should usually be illegal in the second trimester, and 80% said that about the third trimester.
In other words, if Democrats are forced to fight for their actual position on abortion legislatively, they'll be demolished. Third-term abortions are an 80%-20% loser. Second-term abortions are a 65%-35% loser.
So... will Democrats fight for a federal abortion law promising people the right to an abortion in the first fifteen weeks of pregnancy? The period of time the current Mississippi law permits? The one they're claiming is a monstrosity that strips away women's rights?
BRING ON THE FIGHT!
![]()
AP-NORC poll: Most say restrict abortion after 1st trimester
A new poll shows a solid majority of Americans believe most abortions should be legal in the first three months of a woman’s pregnancy, but most say the procedure should usually be illegal in the second and third trimesters.apnews.com
.A fetus has no rights because a fetus is not yet a person. it is merely a potential person.
FYI murder is the UNLAWFUL taking of a life. If abortion is not unlawful then by definition it is not murder.
A fetus has no rights because a fetus is not yet a person. it is merely a potential person.
Let the states decide, and yes people involved in abortions, regardless of their religious affiliations, are murderers when it's about "convenience".
I am by law defined as a person with rights so no.
FYI murder is the UNLAWFUL taking of a life. If abortion is not unlawful then by definition it is not murder.