Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The police don't agree w/your bogus assessment.
In my initial response, I gave the example of "a guy in a uniform holding you", that's a cop and/or store security.I never said a word about the Cops. The Police don't prosecute, Mister Webster.
They don't convict either.
And you should stick with social justice and leave REAL Justice to those that have an IQ.
This poll DOES NOT give adequate information about the safe guards of their sampling methodology. Chances are just as good they skewed their results for a story. From what little information we have, it sounds like their sampling base could be profiled as generally one type of user. Internet based, not having a regular job, at home with mom and dad, disabled, single moms, or retirees with internet access, etc.This latest survey (post the redacted Mueller report,) is a bit of "bad news" for Trump.....not only in his attempts to obstruct justice, but ALSO of his incompetence in such attempts.
As a reminder to the simple math challenged, Trump sycophants, 64% is almost 2 out of 3 voters.
Bad news for Trump: 64% of Americans think attempting and failing to obstruct justice is as bad as obstructing justice
Even if some polls meant anything, this is SurveyMonkey. If the owners of this site paid the 20 bones a month to be a member, they could create surveys, select their own sample groups, and push their own agenda.Polls mean nothing. That said, at this point it seems that 64% of people in America asked (as opposed to just Americans) are as stupid as bat guano.
It's a stupid example, anyhow, since there was no example of trying to obstruct justice.In my initial response, I gave the example of "a guy in a uniform holding you", that's a cop and/or store security.I never said a word about the Cops. The Police don't prosecute, Mister Webster.
They don't convict either.
And you should stick with social justice and leave REAL Justice to those that have an IQ.
The minute you ATTEMPT to steal...you're EFFED!
Period.
This latest survey (post the redacted Mueller report,) is a bit of "bad news" for Trump.....not only in his attempts to obstruct justice, but ALSO of his incompetence in such attempts.
As a reminder to the simple math challenged, Trump sycophants, 64% is almost 2 out of 3 voters.
Bad news for Trump: 64% of Americans think attempting and failing to obstruct justice is as bad as obstructing justice
Trump never attempted it, moron.This latest survey (post the redacted Mueller report,) is a bit of "bad news" for Trump.....not only in his attempts to obstruct justice, but ALSO of his incompetence in such attempts.
As a reminder to the simple math challenged, Trump sycophants, 64% is almost 2 out of 3 voters.
Bad news for Trump: 64% of Americans think attempting and failing to obstruct justice is as bad as obstructing justice
To attempt murder, you actually have to do something.only as much as attempted murder is as bad as murder
or attempted robbery is as bad as robbery,,,
Well, YES, my dear Trump ass kisser........Because a failed attempt makes one an INCOMPETENT murderer or robber....
LOL
Jake, you're so beyond fucked it's incredible. You're actually worse than the last Japanese solider still holding out in the jungles of New Guinea refusing to admit WWII is over.
Oh.....you din't like my post, Frankie????..................Is it me.....or the cited survey that you don't like????.............LMAO
(stay on topic, "deplorable")
Jake, as I've said for the past 2 years, you fuckers made a YUGE mistake in going after Trump in the first place; even worse, your coup failed!
I think both the right and left have gone off the deep end here. Trump is not going to be charged with any crime, at least not while he is in office. He may or may not be facing impeachment which is not a legal process but a political process to remove a goverment official from office for misconduct, such as perjury of oath, abuse of authority, bribery, intimidation, misuse of assets, failure to supervise, dereliction of duty, unbecoming conduct, refusal to obey a lawful order, chronic intoxication, tax evasion, etc.... In other words if Trump in the opinion of congress is guilty of misconduct he can be removed from office. That's it.only as much as attempted murder is as bad as murderThis latest survey (post the redacted Mueller report,) is a bit of "bad news" for Trump.....not only in his attempts to obstruct justice, but ALSO of his incompetence in such attempts.
As a reminder to the simple math challenged, Trump sycophants, 64% is almost 2 out of 3 voters.
Bad news for Trump: 64% of Americans think attempting and failing to obstruct justice is as bad as obstructing justice
or attempted robbery is as bad as robbery,,,
This latest survey (post the redacted Mueller report,) is a bit of "bad news" for Trump.....not only in his attempts to obstruct justice, but ALSO of his incompetence in such attempts.
As a reminder to the simple math challenged, Trump sycophants, 64% is almost 2 out of 3 voters.
Bad news for Trump: 64% of Americans think attempting and failing to obstruct justice is as bad as obstructing justice
Actually, in legal terms it is, 100%.
Here's a helpful primer I happened across yesterday: I like this guy. He's a video law class.
This latest survey (post the redacted Mueller report,) is a bit of "bad news" for Trump.....not only in his attempts to obstruct justice, but ALSO of his incompetence in such attempts.
As a reminder to the simple math challenged, Trump sycophants, 64% is almost 2 out of 3 voters.
Bad news for Trump: 64% of Americans think attempting and failing to obstruct justice is as bad as obstructing justice
Actually, in legal terms it is, 100%.
Here's a helpful primer I happened across yesterday: I like this guy. He's a video law class.
He's slick, but he's also slimy, just as Mueller is. By suggesting the President may be guilty of obstruction but falsely claiming he can't indict him, despite the fact there is no case law to support that claim, and by suggesting the Democrat controlled House is where the President can get a fair hearing, Mueller makes a mockery of his own claim to "fairness".
This latest survey (post the redacted Mueller report,) is a bit of "bad news" for Trump.....not only in his attempts to obstruct justice, but ALSO of his incompetence in such attempts.
As a reminder to the simple math challenged, Trump sycophants, 64% is almost 2 out of 3 voters.
Bad news for Trump: 64% of Americans think attempting and failing to obstruct justice is as bad as obstructing justice
Actually, in legal terms it is, 100%.
Here's a helpful primer I happened across yesterday: I like this guy. He's a video law class.
He's slick, but he's also slimy, just as Mueller is. By suggesting the President may be guilty of obstruction but falsely claiming he can't indict him, despite the fact there is no case law to support that claim, and by suggesting the Democrat controlled House is where the President can get a fair hearing, Mueller makes a mockery of his own claim to "fairness".
Those were as he points out, Mueller's own ground rules from the outset. That means he can find evidence but (thinks he) cannot indict.
Now, the question of whether that's true (that a sitting POTUS can't be indicted) isn't at all settled. There's no known reason that can't happen. So it's a self-limitation.
Now as for Nat thread I am questioning why Nat is using a foreign owned site to support his opinion against Trump but then complains about Russia and Wikileaks?
This latest survey (post the redacted Mueller report,) is a bit of "bad news" for Trump.....not only in his attempts to obstruct justice, but ALSO of his incompetence in such attempts.
As a reminder to the simple math challenged, Trump sycophants, 64% is almost 2 out of 3 voters.
Bad news for Trump: 64% of Americans think attempting and failing to obstruct justice is as bad as obstructing justice
Actually, in legal terms it is, 100%.
Here's a helpful primer I happened across yesterday: I like this guy. He's a video law class.
He's slick, but he's also slimy, just as Mueller is. By suggesting the President may be guilty of obstruction but falsely claiming he can't indict him, despite the fact there is no case law to support that claim, and by suggesting the Democrat controlled House is where the President can get a fair hearing, Mueller makes a mockery of his own claim to "fairness".
Those were as he points out, Mueller's own ground rules from the outset. That means he can find evidence but (thinks he) cannot indict.
Now, the question of whether that's true (that a sitting POTUS can't be indicted) isn't at all settled. There's no known reason that can't happen. So it's a self-limitation.
A). Trump did not attempt to obstruct justice. Just the latest new lie from the left after calling him a pussy grabber, a child molester, and a Nazi whose money all came from his father.
