georgephillip
Diamond Member
If Republicans stand for limited government, why did they champion two illegal wars they didn't bother to pay for along with Medicare Part D?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If Republicans stand for limited government, why did they champion two illegal wars they didn't bother to pay for along with Medicare Part D?
What "Revolution?"If Republicans stand for limited government, why did they champion two illegal wars they didn't bother to pay for along with Medicare Part D?
wars like the Revolution are to promote freedom and so are warranted. Medicare part D was very Republican in that Democrats wanted to spend even more than Republicans.
Of course neither party is pure in action since elections in America are decided by independents. Over your head?
What "Revolution?"If Republicans stand for limited government, why did they champion two illegal wars they didn't bother to pay for along with Medicare Part D?
wars like the Revolution are to promote freedom and so are warranted. Medicare part D was very Republican in that Democrats wanted to spend even more than Republicans.
Of course neither party is pure in action since elections in America are decided by independents. Over your head?
What "Revolution?"wars like the Revolution are to promote freedom and so are warranted. Medicare part D was very Republican in that Democrats wanted to spend even more than Republicans.
Of course neither party is pure in action since elections in America are decided by independents. Over your head?
American Revolution, War in Iraq, Afghanistan, all wars against big liberal governments.
What "Revolution?"
American Revolution, War in Iraq, Afghanistan, all wars against big liberal governments.
Seriously? You're claiming the British Monarchy in 1776, Sadaam Hussein's dictatorship, and the Taliban Theocracy were "liberal" governments? Wow.