76% of GOP Voters Believe Most Reporters Biased Against Trump

What's not to despise?

Lewd. Crude. Crass. Boorish. Ignorant. Arrogant. Unstable. Unreliable. Impractical. Emotional. Impulsive. Demagogic. Megalomaniacal. Lying. Dangerous.

Incompetent.

Totally unfit for high office.

Small wonder that they hammer-away at The Creature 24 x 7.

If you honestly think about what you just said there, you will realize that you described Hillary Clinton almost perfectly.

The only thing you missed was: riding on her rapist impeached husband's claim to fame.
Close, anyway...

We had two very crappy choices on November 8, 2016.

1. Corrupt, sane competency

2. Corrupt, unstable incompetency

Unfortunately, 'corrupt sane competency' lost.

The lesser of two very great evils.

However, that apt description of one applies in-spades to He Who Must Not Be Named...

You honestly think Hillary is, was, or could forever be considered sane?
 
What's not to despise?

Lewd. Crude. Crass. Boorish. Ignorant. Arrogant. Unstable. Unreliable. Impractical. Emotional. Impulsive. Demagogic. Megalomaniacal. Lying. Dangerous.

Incompetent.

Totally unfit for high office.

Small wonder that they hammer-away at The Creature 24 x 7.

Total horseshit, of course.
 
Snowflakes love polls, but this one says the public thinks their news is fake.


Voters are still critical of the news coverage President Trump is getting and continue to believe most reporters are out to get him.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that only 34% of Likely U.S. Voters rate the media coverage of the president as good or excellent. Forty-four percent (44%) describe the coverage of Trump as poor. Both findings are up slightly from January just before Trump took office and are consistent with views of the media coverage of last year's Clinton. vs. Trump presidential campaign. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

Fifty percent (50%) think most reporters are biased against the president, up two points from January. Just four percent (4%) think most reporters are biased in Trump's favor, a 12-point drop from the previous survey. Forty percent (40%) think the majority of reporters try to be fair and balanced, up from 31%.

So? 88% of Republicans thought electing a birther and con man was a good idea.
and a great plan to eliminate ISIS ,,,,,,etc etc the man is a total fraud a loud mouthed bully with teams of lawyers behind him How many does he have now ? 3 ?
ISIS is already on it's way to becoming extinct, moron.
 
Snowflakes love polls, but this one says the public thinks their news is fake.


Voters are still critical of the news coverage President Trump is getting and continue to believe most reporters are out to get him.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that only 34% of Likely U.S. Voters rate the media coverage of the president as good or excellent. Forty-four percent (44%) describe the coverage of Trump as poor. Both findings are up slightly from January just before Trump took office and are consistent with views of the media coverage of last year's Clinton. vs. Trump presidential campaign. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

Fifty percent (50%) think most reporters are biased against the president, up two points from January. Just four percent (4%) think most reporters are biased in Trump's favor, a 12-point drop from the previous survey. Forty percent (40%) think the majority of reporters try to be fair and balanced, up from 31%.

So? 88% of Republicans thought electing a birther and con man was a good idea.
It's a better idea than electing an evil criminal.
 
Snowflakes love polls, but this one says the public thinks their news is fake.


Voters are still critical of the news coverage President Trump is getting and continue to believe most reporters are out to get him.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that only 34% of Likely U.S. Voters rate the media coverage of the president as good or excellent. Forty-four percent (44%) describe the coverage of Trump as poor. Both findings are up slightly from January just before Trump took office and are consistent with views of the media coverage of last year's Clinton. vs. Trump presidential campaign. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

Fifty percent (50%) think most reporters are biased against the president, up two points from January. Just four percent (4%) think most reporters are biased in Trump's favor, a 12-point drop from the previous survey. Forty percent (40%) think the majority of reporters try to be fair and balanced, up from 31%.

Telling the truth about Trump is , just telling the truth, something he never does.

When do snowflakes like you ever tell the truth?
 
What's not to despise?

Lewd. Crude. Crass. Boorish. Ignorant. Arrogant. Unstable. Unreliable. Impractical. Emotional. Impulsive. Demagogic. Megalomaniacal. Lying. Dangerous.

Incompetent.

Totally unfit for high office.

Small wonder that they hammer-away at The Creature 24 x 7.
And yet he won and his party continues to win. Amazing that.
 
What's not to despise?

Lewd. Crude. Crass. Boorish. Ignorant. Arrogant. Unstable. Unreliable. Impractical. Emotional. Impulsive. Demagogic. Megalomaniacal. Lying. Dangerous.

Incompetent.

Totally unfit for high office.

Small wonder that they hammer-away at The Creature 24 x 7.
Who was your candidate?
 
What's not to despise?

Lewd. Crude. Crass. Boorish. Ignorant. Arrogant. Unstable. Unreliable. Impractical. Emotional. Impulsive. Demagogic. Megalomaniacal. Lying. Dangerous.

Incompetent.

Totally unfit for high office.

Small wonder that they hammer-away at The Creature 24 x 7.
All you proved is that you're just as biased and petulant and stupid as the snowflakes in the media.
 
What's not to despise?

Lewd. Crude. Crass. Boorish. Ignorant. Arrogant. Unstable. Unreliable. Impractical. Emotional. Impulsive. Demagogic. Megalomaniacal. Lying. Dangerous.

Incompetent.

Totally unfit for high office.

Small wonder that they hammer-away at The Creature 24 x 7.
And yet he won and his party continues to win. Amazing that.
He won the election.
 
What's not to despise?

Lewd. Crude. Crass. Boorish. Ignorant. Arrogant. Unstable. Unreliable. Impractical. Emotional. Impulsive. Demagogic. Megalomaniacal. Lying. Dangerous.

Incompetent.

Totally unfit for high office.

Small wonder that they hammer-away at The Creature 24 x 7.
Who was your candidate?
Hillary the lying criminal, of course.
 
What's not to despise?

Lewd. Crude. Crass. Boorish. Ignorant. Arrogant. Unstable. Unreliable. Impractical. Emotional. Impulsive. Demagogic. Megalomaniacal. Lying. Dangerous.

Incompetent.

Totally unfit for high office.

Small wonder that they hammer-away at The Creature 24 x 7.

If you honestly think about what you just said there, you will realize that you described Hillary Clinton almost perfectly.

The only thing you missed was: riding on her rapist impeached husband's claim to fame.
Close, anyway...

We had two very crappy choices on November 8, 2016.

1. Corrupt, sane competency

2. Corrupt, unstable incompetency

Unfortunately, 'corrupt sane competency' lost.

The lesser of two very great evils.

However, that apt description of one applies in-spades to He Who Must Not Be Named...

There's nothing "sane" about Hillary.
 
It's not just a 'belief', it's fact. Several independent studies have been done on Media Bias. And all have concluded that most Journalists are Left-leaning Democrats. As young impressionable minds in Journalism Schools, they're thoroughly indoctrinated on Communist/Progressive ideology. They then graduate and move onto careers in MSM. And obviously they carry their Left/Democrat bias with them. It is what it is.
 
What's not to despise?

Lewd. Crude. Crass. Boorish. Ignorant. Arrogant. Unstable. Unreliable. Impractical. Emotional. Impulsive. Demagogic. Megalomaniacal. Lying. Dangerous.

Incompetent.

Totally unfit for high office.

Small wonder that they hammer-away at The Creature 24 x 7.

If you honestly think about what you just said there, you will realize that you described Hillary Clinton almost perfectly.

The only thing you missed was: riding on her rapist impeached husband's claim to fame.
Close, anyway...

We had two very crappy choices on November 8, 2016.

1. Corrupt, sane competency

2. Corrupt, unstable incompetency

Unfortunately, 'corrupt sane competency' lost.

The lesser of two very great evils.

However, that apt description of one applies in-spades to He Who Must Not Be Named...

You honestly think Hillary is, was, or could forever be considered sane?
Compared to The Creature? Definitely.
 
What's not to despise?

Lewd. Crude. Crass. Boorish. Ignorant. Arrogant. Unstable. Unreliable. Impractical. Emotional. Impulsive. Demagogic. Megalomaniacal. Lying. Dangerous.

Incompetent.

Totally unfit for high office.

Small wonder that they hammer-away at The Creature 24 x 7.
And yet he won and his party continues to win. Amazing that.
Not really.

The Dems phukked-up five-ways-to-Sunday, over the past several years, and got bitch-slapped for it.

The Creature was the only alternative.

Sad.
 
What's not to despise?

Lewd. Crude. Crass. Boorish. Ignorant. Arrogant. Unstable. Unreliable. Impractical. Emotional. Impulsive. Demagogic. Megalomaniacal. Lying. Dangerous.

Incompetent.

Totally unfit for high office.

Small wonder that they hammer-away at The Creature 24 x 7.
Who was your candidate?
Shrillary.

I voted for her, and felt dirty while doing it, and felt like I needed a shower once I returned home.

I want us to flush the invasion wave of 11-12,000,000 Illegal Aliens out of the country.

I want us to ban immigration from Muslim-dominated lands for a decade or two... or ten.

I want us to throw the Gay Mafia under the bus.

I want all those things.

It's just that - to me - The Creature was far too high a price, to get what I wanted.

That left the HildaBeast... and I was not a happy camper about that... so I held my nose, and cast my vote... wasted, as it turns out.
 
Last edited:
What's not to despise?

Lewd. Crude. Crass. Boorish. Ignorant. Arrogant. Unstable. Unreliable. Impractical. Emotional. Impulsive. Demagogic. Megalomaniacal. Lying. Dangerous.

Incompetent.

Totally unfit for high office.

Small wonder that they hammer-away at The Creature 24 x 7.
All you proved is that you're just as biased and petulant and stupid as the snowflakes in the media.
Mind your manners in the presence of your betters, pissant.
 

Forum List

Back
Top