WinterBorn
Diamond Member
- Moderator
- #421
The No-Fly list has people on it that only have a similar name. The No-Fly list requires no evidence, no ability to defend yourself, and covers anyone with a name sufficiently similar. In fact, even if you prove you are not the person that was meant to be on the No-Fly list, you still cannot fly. So no, the No-Fly list is not worth its salt.
And how many hijackings have we had since it was put into place? Oh, that's right... ZERO!!!!
And, as I have asked over and over, did he claim to be The Joker in the gun store? Did is display signs of obvious psychosis in front of the clerk? Or did he seem reasonable and normal? Unless you can show any evidence that there was behavior that showed he was crazy, this line of argument is worthless. But his therapist knew he was nuts. And the therapist is required by law to report such insanity.
His therapist didn't give him a machine gun and a 100 round clip. The gun store did that.
Yes I am. But that is not what the 2nd says. It does not say "the right of the militia to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed". It is a right of the people.
The people collectively, not a person individually. If it was so clear, why didn't anyone see it that way until 2008?
The therapist KNEW he was crazy and ignored the law that requires he report him. The gun store clerk did NOT know he was crazy, and since his name was not in the database (due to the therapist violating the law), he sold a customer a gun.
And the phrase "the people" appears in the 1st and 4th amendments as well. Are those collective rights too?