Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I dont care one way or another if you post your video, lol
but wings get clipped right on off, and this one did not start on fire because the wing tanks were filled with water!
It was a test to see how well the plane would perform in a crash
otherwise all that fog you see would be huge massive inferno of flames.
.
No lamp post involved and the fireball occured when the plane struck the ground.... and it was still moving pretty good.
So that was a complete fail on your part. Want to try again?
Sheesh, I provided 4 instances where an actual plane struck an actual light post and survived mostly intact even though two of them were airborne at the time... and you respond with a video of an intentional crash into an object clearly not a lamp post which was probably specifically reinforced to withstand the forces involved as part of the test AND it still does not burst into flames when the wing hits the object and the plane continues going until it crashes into the ground and then and only then does it burst into a fireball.
You have not really thought this whole thing through, huh?
Conspiracy theorists usually don't think any further than their one point. In this case he can't think further than the light poles.
1.) Is it a lamp post
Answer NO!
YES
2.) Does it explode into a fireball as soon as the wing is struck?
Answer NO!
THE WING IS FILLED WITH WATER DUH!!!
3.) Is it a large commercial aircraft
Answer NO!
YES
4.) Does it come to a stop before 100 meters
Answer unable to determine.
YES
So you missed entirely on 3 items and are inconclusive on the 4th.
WRONG, you are demonstrating that you are incapable of understanding how to perform a side by side comparison. Better stick with your official report then, you are unteachable.
like I said, you ignore tha mountain of data and cling to this one minor curiosity as if it cancels out the whole thing. that's ok if you want to believe it but don't expect us to.
well see since physics calls bullshit you need to explain how these miracles took place, and I will remind you that we are talking about the events between the impact of the first pole and the last pole. So I expect someone has an explanation how these miracles took place.
Physics does not call bull shit. that only exists in your deranged mind.
No lamp post involved and the fireball occured when the plane struck the ground.... and it was still moving pretty good.
So that was a complete fail on your part. Want to try again?
Sheesh, I provided 4 instances where an actual plane struck an actual light post and survived mostly intact even though two of them were airborne at the time... and you respond with a video of an intentional crash into an object clearly not a lamp post which was probably specifically reinforced to withstand the forces involved as part of the test AND it still does not burst into flames when the wing hits the object and the plane continues going until it crashes into the ground and then and only then does it burst into a fireball.
You have not really thought this whole thing through, huh?
Conspiracy theorists usually don't think any further than their one point. In this case he can't think further than the light poles.
oh dont kid yourself, this is only the beginning, if so many people were not victims this would be the best comedy I have seen in a long time, however this is the problem at hand that needs to be sorted out but thats ok.
Wrong, what you are proving is that you are an unrepetant liar.
Conspiracy theorists usually don't think any further than their one point. In this case he can't think further than the light poles.
oh dont kid yourself, this is only the beginning, if so many people were not victims this would be the best comedy I have seen in a long time, however this is the problem at hand that needs to be sorted out but thats ok.
If this needs to be sorted out, why don't you or Bobby (never sat in a jet cockpit) Balsamo take it into a court of law and get the "perps" prosecuted for the "inside job"??
well see since physics calls bullshit you need to explain how these miracles took place, and I will remind you that we are talking about the events between the impact of the first pole and the last pole. So I expect someone has an explanation how these miracles took place.
Physics does not call bull shit. that only exists in your deranged mind.
really?
so you really believe that a 400 pound pole hit at 500 mph that is snapped in 1/2 just bounced right on off the wing do ya?
When a teenee lil ole birdie goes right on through it at 1/2 the speed?
Do tell us what miracle applies then?
oh dont kid yourself, this is only the beginning, if so many people were not victims this would be the best comedy I have seen in a long time, however this is the problem at hand that needs to be sorted out but thats ok.
If this needs to be sorted out, why don't you or Bobby (never sat in a jet cockpit) Balsamo take it into a court of law and get the "perps" prosecuted for the "inside job"??
I dont need my hair parted and I prefer that when I drink a beer I can at least digest it before it pours back out, and judges feel the same way I am sure.
If this needs to be sorted out, why don't you or Bobby (never sat in a jet cockpit) Balsamo take it into a court of law and get the "perps" prosecuted for the "inside job"??
I dont need my hair parted and I prefer that when I drink a beer I can at least digest it before it pours back out, and judges feel the same way I am sure.
So you're just here JAQing around, huh??
Quelle surprise.
I dont care one way or another if you post your video, lol
but wings get clipped right on off, and this one did not start on fire because the wing tanks were filled with water!
It was a test to see how well the plane would perform in a crash
otherwise all that fog you see would be huge massive inferno of flames.
.
No lamp post involved and the fireball occured when the plane struck the ground.... and it was still moving pretty good.
So that was a complete fail on your part. Want to try again?
Sheesh, I provided 4 instances where an actual plane struck an actual light post and survived mostly intact even though two of them were airborne at the time... and you respond with a video of an intentional crash into an object clearly not a lamp post which was probably specifically reinforced to withstand the forces involved as part of the test AND it still does not burst into flames when the wing hits the object and the plane continues going until it crashes into the ground and then and only then does it burst into a fireball.
You have not really thought this whole thing through, huh?
Conspiracy theorists usually don't think any further than their one point. In this case he can't think further than the light poles.
I dont need my hair parted and I prefer that when I drink a beer I can at least digest it before it pours back out, and judges feel the same way I am sure.
So you're just here JAQing around, huh??
Quelle surprise.
I am here to have fun, why are you here?
) Bobby (11.6 G) Balsamo or Pope Dickie (Cardboard Boxes) Gage.
Wrong, what you are proving is that you are an unrepetant liar.
forget the breakaway, you can balance the pole on bubble gum ok.
thats about as max breakaway as you can get! LMAO
so do your math based on a pole that is simply balanced pointing straight up.
That should help reduce your confusion and still come up with the same answer.
The basic wing structure remains intact
Wrong, what you are proving is that you are an unrepetant liar.
forget the breakaway, you can balance the pole on bubble gum ok.
thats about as max breakaway as you can get! LMAO
so do your math based on a pole that is simply balanced pointing straight up.
That should help reduce your confusion and still come up with the same answer.
No link eh? I did not think you would provide one. LOL
So how come an FAA test on a DC-7 hitting TWO telephone poles shows the plane smashing through the 14 inch diameter pole which hits the inside of the wing while the weaker oustside wing is sheared off by the 13 inch diameter, yet the plane continues on for well over a 100 meters ... Now this is pretty cool got to the 1:08 mark
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHZY0-XUmMA"]DC7 Crash Test - YouTube[/ame]The basic wing structure remains intact
Imagine that.
I already told you that the part of the plane with the strongest axial loading was between the engines and the body and that is where your 1:08 point is talking about.
and why did you add an inch to the pole ratings?
and all poles have ratings despite the material, what is the difference then that you seem to get so excited about between the poles in the demonstration and poles outside the pent? also I told you and again you dodge it.
forget the breakaway, you can balance the pole on bubble gum ok.
The plane sheared off two utility poles and knocked over two others... The pilot managed to land the plane with no injuries to the 96 people on board.
One person was killed and another injured Tuesday when the small plane they were in crashed into a bank parking lot in Bolingbrook, Ill., police said... Federal Aviation Administration spokeswoman Elizabeth Isham Cory said the plane was "heavily damaged" after hitting a tree, a light pole and vehicles in the Chase Bank branch parking lot, the Chicago Tribune reported.
A World War II-era training plane struck a utility pole and knocked off part of a wing on a landing approach to Whiteman Airport in Pacoima on Monday, then landed safely at Van Nuys Airport, authorities said.
A United Airlines Boeing 727 jetliner, taking off from Denver Thursday, struck a radio installation 15 feet off the ground when a sudden wind change robbed the plane of its ability to make a normal climb.
The pilots, unaware they had hit anything, found after climbing several thousand feet that they could not pressurize the fuselage. They made a safe landing back at Denver's Stapleton International Airport.
BANGALORE: The Bengaluru International Airport (BIA) was closed for nearly two hours on Thursday night after an IndiGo aircraft hit three runway edge lights while landing.
Though the aircraft came to a safe halt, the poles came down, plunging the runway into darkness around 8.45pm. The plane was arriving from New Delhi.
ORLANDO - A small plane crashed into a utility pole while trying to make an emergency landing on a golf course Tuesday, seriously injuring the two people aboard.
