96% of Clintons Charity Donations Went to Clinton Foundation

[Juan de Fuca]

Unlike the Clinton Foundation, the primary beneficiary of the Trump Foundation isn't himself.

Do some reading before posting bullshit.

Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent, Assertive Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch

None

"When anyone contributes to the Clinton Foundation, it actually goes toward fat salaries, administrative bloat, and lavish travel. Between 2009 and 2012, the Clinton Foundation raised over $500 million dollars according to a review of IRS documents by The Federalist (2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008). A measly 15 percent of that, or $75 million, went towards programmatic grants. More than $25 million went to fund travel expenses. Nearly $110 million went toward employee salaries and benefits. And a whopping $290 million during that period — nearly 60 percent of all money raised — was classified merely as ‘other expenses.’ "

It seems your site makes up a lot of numbers that have no basis in fact. https://www.clintonfoundation.org/files/clinton_foundation_report_public_9-10-13.pdf

 

[bripat9643]

Unlike the Clinton Foundation, the primary beneficiary of the Trump Foundation isn't himself.

Do some reading before posting bullshit.

Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent, Assertive Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch

None

"When anyone contributes to the Clinton Foundation, it actually goes toward fat salaries, administrative bloat, and lavish travel. Between 2009 and 2012, the Clinton Foundation raised over $500 million dollars according to a review of IRS documents by The Federalist (2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008). A measly 15 percent of that, or $75 million, went towards programmatic grants. More than $25 million went to fund travel expenses. Nearly $110 million went toward employee salaries and benefits. And a whopping $290 million during that period — nearly 60 percent of all money raised — was classified merely as ‘other expenses.’ "

CharityWatch vs. Rushbo? You're kidding, right?!?!

The article is by politifact, dumbass.

 

[IcebergSlim]

And everyone knows the Clinton Foundation is just a money laundering scam. Charity watchdog Charity Navigator won't even rank them they are so far out there on the fringe.

96 Percent Of Hillary’s Charitable Donations In 2015 Went To Clinton Foundation

Charity Navigator apparently ranks CHARITIES......which do not operate the same as charitable FOUNDATIONS......

and what, pray tell, is the issue with Hillary directing most of her giving to the Foundation?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Unlike the Clinton Foundation, the primary beneficiary of the Trump Foundation isn't himself.

Do some reading before posting bullshit.

Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent, Assertive Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch

None

"When anyone contributes to the Clinton Foundation, it actually goes toward fat salaries, administrative bloat, and lavish travel. Between 2009 and 2012, the Clinton Foundation raised over $500 million dollars according to a review of IRS documents by The Federalist (2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008). A measly 15 percent of that, or $75 million, went towards programmatic grants. More than $25 million went to fund travel expenses. Nearly $110 million went toward employee salaries and benefits. And a whopping $290 million during that period — nearly 60 percent of all money raised — was classified merely as ‘other expenses.’ "

You're kidding, right?

You couldn't possibly be stupid enough to provide a link to a Politifact article refuting your quote as "Mostly False" as your source, could you?

 

[IcebergSlim]

Who wudda thunk the clintons were such charitable people ....to themselves.....

They could,care fucking less about their poor....

How is giving money to their FOUNDATION being charitable to themselves?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Unlike the Clinton Foundation, the primary beneficiary of the Trump Foundation isn't himself.

Do some reading before posting bullshit.

Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent, Assertive Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch

None

"When anyone contributes to the Clinton Foundation, it actually goes toward fat salaries, administrative bloat, and lavish travel. Between 2009 and 2012, the Clinton Foundation raised over $500 million dollars according to a review of IRS documents by The Federalist (2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008). A measly 15 percent of that, or $75 million, went towards programmatic grants. More than $25 million went to fund travel expenses. Nearly $110 million went toward employee salaries and benefits. And a whopping $290 million during that period — nearly 60 percent of all money raised — was classified merely as ‘other expenses.’ "

CharityWatch vs. Rushbo? You're kidding, right?!?!

The article is by politifact, dumbass.

It sure is - and they rate your quote as "Mostly False".

 

[easyt65]

Charity?

Slush Fund...

 

[IcebergSlim]

Unlike the Clinton Foundation, the primary beneficiary of the Trump Foundation isn't himself.

Do some reading before posting bullshit.

Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent, Assertive Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch

None

"When anyone contributes to the Clinton Foundation, it actually goes toward fat salaries, administrative bloat, and lavish travel. Between 2009 and 2012, the Clinton Foundation raised over $500 million dollars according to a review of IRS documents by The Federalist (2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008). A measly 15 percent of that, or $75 million, went towards programmatic grants. More than $25 million went to fund travel expenses. Nearly $110 million went toward employee salaries and benefits. And a whopping $290 million during that period — nearly 60 percent of all money raised — was classified merely as ‘other expenses.’ "

You're kidding, right?

You couldn't possibly be stupid enough to provide a link to a Politifact article refuting your quote as "Mostly False" as your source, could you?

Have you met Bripat?

Go on, Bri...show the Doc your Tiara.....

 

[leftwinger]

To bolster its case, CARLY for America noted that the Clinton Foundation spent 12 percent of its revenue on travel and conferences and 20 percent of its revenue on salaries. That’s true. But the Form 990 specifically breaks out those travel, conference and salary expenses that are used for “program service expenses” versus those that are used for management or fundraising

Go look at form 990 PDF eye-opening. $227mil cash on hand. Two of biggest donations to Presidential & Climate? WTH? Someone post this PDF please. It is in one of ComradV links.

I guess threads mergerd b4 I cud post

 

[IsaacNewton]

Trump has built a wall between his tax returns and the light of day.

 

[IcebergSlim]

Charity?

Slush Fund...

Now if I call you an idiot, will you suffer another attack of the vapors?

The foundation files an audited return.........readily available for your viewing....

 

[konradv]

Unlike the Clinton Foundation, the primary beneficiary of the Trump Foundation isn't himself.

Do some reading before posting bullshit.

Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent, Assertive Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch

None

"When anyone contributes to the Clinton Foundation, it actually goes toward fat salaries, administrative bloat, and lavish travel. Between 2009 and 2012, the Clinton Foundation raised over $500 million dollars according to a review of IRS documents by The Federalist (2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008). A measly 15 percent of that, or $75 million, went towards programmatic grants. More than $25 million went to fund travel expenses. Nearly $110 million went toward employee salaries and benefits. And a whopping $290 million during that period — nearly 60 percent of all money raised — was classified merely as ‘other expenses.’ "

CharityWatch vs. Rushbo? You're kidding, right?!?!

The article is by politifact, dumbass.

The title of the article is
Rush Limbaugh says Clinton Foundation spends just 15 percent on charity, 85 percent on overhead

 

[bripat9643]

Unlike the Clinton Foundation, the primary beneficiary of the Trump Foundation isn't himself.

Do some reading before posting bullshit.

Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent, Assertive Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch

None

"When anyone contributes to the Clinton Foundation, it actually goes toward fat salaries, administrative bloat, and lavish travel. Between 2009 and 2012, the Clinton Foundation raised over $500 million dollars according to a review of IRS documents by The Federalist (2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008). A measly 15 percent of that, or $75 million, went towards programmatic grants. More than $25 million went to fund travel expenses. Nearly $110 million went toward employee salaries and benefits. And a whopping $290 million during that period — nearly 60 percent of all money raised — was classified merely as ‘other expenses.’ "

You're kidding, right?

You couldn't possibly be stupid enough to provide a link to a Politifact article refuting your quote as "Mostly False" as your source, could you?

The article I provided a link to says the Clintons are the primary beneficiaries of the Clinton Foundation. I even quoted the text where it says that. Apparently you can't read.

 

[bripat9643]

Unlike the Clinton Foundation, the primary beneficiary of the Trump Foundation isn't himself.

Do some reading before posting bullshit.

Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent, Assertive Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch

None

"When anyone contributes to the Clinton Foundation, it actually goes toward fat salaries, administrative bloat, and lavish travel. Between 2009 and 2012, the Clinton Foundation raised over $500 million dollars according to a review of IRS documents by The Federalist (2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008). A measly 15 percent of that, or $75 million, went towards programmatic grants. More than $25 million went to fund travel expenses. Nearly $110 million went toward employee salaries and benefits. And a whopping $290 million during that period — nearly 60 percent of all money raised — was classified merely as ‘other expenses.’ "

CharityWatch vs. Rushbo? You're kidding, right?!?!

The article is by politifact, dumbass.

The title of the article is
Rush Limbaugh says Clinton Foundation spends just 15 percent on charity, 85 percent on overhead

So? The article evaluates the claim and says he's correct, dumbass.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Unlike the Clinton Foundation, the primary beneficiary of the Trump Foundation isn't himself.

Do some reading before posting bullshit.

Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent, Assertive Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch

None

"When anyone contributes to the Clinton Foundation, it actually goes toward fat salaries, administrative bloat, and lavish travel. Between 2009 and 2012, the Clinton Foundation raised over $500 million dollars according to a review of IRS documents by The Federalist (2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008). A measly 15 percent of that, or $75 million, went towards programmatic grants. More than $25 million went to fund travel expenses. Nearly $110 million went toward employee salaries and benefits. And a whopping $290 million during that period — nearly 60 percent of all money raised — was classified merely as ‘other expenses.’ "

You're kidding, right?

You couldn't possibly be stupid enough to provide a link to a Politifact article refuting your quote as "Mostly False" as your source, could you?

The article I provided a link to says the Clintons are the primary beneficiaries of the Clinton Foundation. I even quoted the text where it says that. Apparently you can't read.

No, the link you provided goes into explicit detail on how the quote you posted is "Mostly False", along with the other claims made on Rush's show (which is where your quote came from).

Did you bother to read it before you posted it?

 

[konradv]

Unlike the Clinton Foundation, the primary beneficiary of the Trump Foundation isn't himself.

Do some reading before posting bullshit.

Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent, Assertive Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch

None

"When anyone contributes to the Clinton Foundation, it actually goes toward fat salaries, administrative bloat, and lavish travel. Between 2009 and 2012, the Clinton Foundation raised over $500 million dollars according to a review of IRS documents by The Federalist (2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008). A measly 15 percent of that, or $75 million, went towards programmatic grants. More than $25 million went to fund travel expenses. Nearly $110 million went toward employee salaries and benefits. And a whopping $290 million during that period — nearly 60 percent of all money raised — was classified merely as ‘other expenses.’ "

You're kidding, right?

You couldn't possibly be stupid enough to provide a link to a Politifact article refuting your quote as "Mostly False" as your source, could you?

The article I provided a link to says the Clintons are the primary beneficiaries of the Clinton Foundation. I even quoted the text where it says that. Apparently you can't read.

Like I said, I'll take Charity Watch's word over your cherry-picked cites.

 

[bripat9643]

Unlike the Clinton Foundation, the primary beneficiary of the Trump Foundation isn't himself.

Do some reading before posting bullshit.

Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent, Assertive Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch

None

"When anyone contributes to the Clinton Foundation, it actually goes toward fat salaries, administrative bloat, and lavish travel. Between 2009 and 2012, the Clinton Foundation raised over $500 million dollars according to a review of IRS documents by The Federalist (2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008). A measly 15 percent of that, or $75 million, went towards programmatic grants. More than $25 million went to fund travel expenses. Nearly $110 million went toward employee salaries and benefits. And a whopping $290 million during that period — nearly 60 percent of all money raised — was classified merely as ‘other expenses.’ "

You're kidding, right?

You couldn't possibly be stupid enough to provide a link to a Politifact article refuting your quote as "Mostly False" as your source, could you?

Have you met Bripat?

Go on, Bri...show the Doc your Tiara.....

You and the doctor both have a PHD in stupid.

 

[IcebergSlim]

and yet the only liars here are the ones claiming chelaea clinton gets a seven figure salary from the clinton foundation

so what were you saying about ethics?

Why don't you condemn Hillary for her lying?

yeah, not happy with her over that - and not that it changes what she's done but donald trump and the truth dont have a working relationship either.

that said, in this thread the only liars are the ones claiming chelsea clinton gets a seven figure salary from the clinton foundation.

and yet you don't seem to have a problem with that

Hillary Lies - 678

Trump Lies - 25

Which is worse?

seriously? where are you getting those numbers?

Damn...you really are completely lost.

If you think Trump is a bigger liar than Cankles, you got a screw loose.

5. More about Trump

Ninety-five of the 158 fact-checks of claims made by Trump have been rated False or Pants on Fire. Add in Mostly False and that accounts for 123 (78 percent) of all of Trump’s fact-checked claims.


6. More about Clinton

Just 16 of Clinton’s 120 rated statements ended up as False or Pants on Fire. By contrast, 53 percent of the statements we fact-checked were rated True or Mostly True.​

What 650 fact-checks of the presidential candidates tell us


Are you gonna need a quick primer on The Ordinal Property of Numbers?

 

[IcebergSlim]

Unlike the Clinton Foundation, the primary beneficiary of the Trump Foundation isn't himself.

Do some reading before posting bullshit.

Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent, Assertive Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch

None

"When anyone contributes to the Clinton Foundation, it actually goes toward fat salaries, administrative bloat, and lavish travel. Between 2009 and 2012, the Clinton Foundation raised over $500 million dollars according to a review of IRS documents by The Federalist (2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008). A measly 15 percent of that, or $75 million, went towards programmatic grants. More than $25 million went to fund travel expenses. Nearly $110 million went toward employee salaries and benefits. And a whopping $290 million during that period — nearly 60 percent of all money raised — was classified merely as ‘other expenses.’ "

You're kidding, right?

You couldn't possibly be stupid enough to provide a link to a Politifact article refuting your quote as "Mostly False" as your source, could you?

Have you met Bripat?

Go on, Bri...show the Doc your Tiara.....

You and the doctor both have a PHD in stupid.

Tell the Doc how your GoFunMe project is faring........

 

[sealybobo]

This just goes to show what a couple of total douche bags the Clintons are.

96 Percent Of Hillary’s Charitable Donations In 2015 Went To Clinton Foundation​

Hillary Clinton and her husband Bill deducted $1,042,000 in charitable contributions last year — $1 million of which went to their own family non-profit, the Clinton Foundation.

Clinton released her tax forms on Friday in a move that is seen as a way to pressure Donald Trump to release his taxes. The GOP nominee has refused to release the records, saying that he is under a routine audit.​

That's their charity supid

As I already stated, the Clintons are the primary beneficiaries of the Clinton Foundation.

Oh that's true but don't hate the player, hate the game. Rich people and business owners know how to game the system. I know this guy who owns a business and he has a foundation too. The foundation is a tax shelter. They pay themselves a salary and very little goes to the people the charity is designed to help.

I bet the Clinton's give millions. My friend gives very little.