meaner gene
Diamond Member
- Feb 11, 2017
- 21,936
- 18,180
Are guilty vs Claimed guilty.
Do you think they mean the same thing?
Do you think they mean the same thing?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't you morons realize that no one is swallowing this horseshit?We had a terrorist name of trump who tried to take this country over after we the people voted him out by several million of us. He murdered and injured a lot of good people that day, laid waste to our nation's Capitol, and where were you and the rest of these republicans who are always pretending to be on the side of law and order?
What?This is obviously a mistake. Groups of vibrancy and courage only strengthen our communities, they don't weaken them. Do you know who weakens communities of strength, adversity, and courage?
The police.
More importantly, racist, white police.
I am willing to bet that the DA in this case is not a person of triumph, and challenge. I bet he is probably an evil white, Christian.
Don't you morons realize that no one is swallowing this horseshit?
I used the word claim in both the posts you quoted, Moron.Before you show your stupidiy, let me warn you what you claimed before, vs what you claim now.
Which has now morphed into.
You went from "ARE GUILTY" to "claimed guilty"
You do know that's a big difference.
When is your education done?Sorry if I believed that you understood English.
I know that not everybody who posts here is a native English speaker. But they should at least understand simple English (grade school level)
What?They have it on video.
The difference is you LIED about what I claimed.I used the word claim in both the posts you quoted, Moron.![]()
Once more. I never said he was guilty.The original claim in your failed scenario is he is guilty of a crime.
No they don't, moron.They have it on video.
I never said YOU said anything, Dumbass. I addressed the claim in the failed scenario you came up withThe difference is you LIED about what I claimed.
Once more. I never said he was guilty.
It never stops showing. He still believes the fact that the UN inspectors never found any WMD proves that there were none.I never said YOU said anything, Dumbass. I addressed the claim in the failed scenario you came up with
Your stupidity is showing again, Stupid.
I never said YOU said anything, Dumbass.
And who posted my scenario?The original claim in your failed scenario is he is guilty of a crime.
Try to figure it out in your own, Cletus.And who posted my scenario?
Your lies are getting deeper and deeper. I suggest you stop digging.
It never stops showing. He still believes the fact that the UN inspectors never found any WMD proves that there were none.
You used the words "it doesn't prove their non-existence" and "it proves their non-existence." Why do you imagine those two statements are identical?Logic failure.
When group A, finds nothing, it doesn't prove their non-existence.
When group B, finds nothing, it proves their non-existence.
What's the difference between group A and group B other than who you are willing to believe?
I clarified.You used the words "it doesn't prove their non-existence" and "it proves their non-existence." Why do you imagine those two statements are identical?
Because he is a moron.You used the words "it doesn't prove their non-existence" and "it proves their non-existence." Why do you imagine those two statements are identical?
Why do you call people "snowflakes", jerkwad?As I said previously, snowflakes used to damn-near argue to the death that election fraud did not exist. Then election fraud was caught / exposed so often - and still is - snowflakes were FORCED to abandon their original argument and switch to ' NOT ENOUGH TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE' ... BUT CASES LIKE THIS PROVE EVEN THAT IS A LIE.
3 votes...it was smart of them to not get greedy & pad the numberd...they fudged just enough.