A few question's for atheists ?

[Yoda]

Why do most atheists defend Neo-darwinism when Neo-darwinism can't give a logical explanation supported by evidence as to the origins of life ?

Why do they reject the possibility of creation ?

Why do SO many republican Christians defend socioeconomic Darwinism when it is such a blood thirsty and un Christ like way of life? Why do those Christians reject love, mutual responsibility, or any HINT of rational reciprocity?

Because you don't believe what they believe in exactly the same way. That's why the Christian right views Islam as evil, and why Christians look down on other Christians of different denominations. If you don't believe that they are 100% right, then you're going to hell. That's my observation from being raised in a christian home anyway.

 

[Youwerecreated]

The biological imperative of the simplest organism is survival. How is this complicated?

Where did this imperative come from ? How do you know it's biological ?

So are you saying this natural system is a thinker and intelligent ?

The fact that even single cell bacteria have basic "healing" mechanisms, such as enzymes that repair damage to their cell walls. That pretty much makes it biological. So much for that extensive research.

Thank you for your evidence of micro-adaptations.

Now explain how defense mechanisms can cause us to have this strong will to survive ?

 

[Youwerecreated]

So is deism.

Wrong.

Design through necessity is evidence of a creator.

Or would you tackle this question;How would a naturalist explain necessities to survive coming about by a non-intelligent , non-thinking process ?

What necessity was there for the design?

Necessities to life ,heart ,lungs,brains,blood,veins going where they need to,arteries,liver,intestines,now how bout oxygen,water , and the all important biggie, cells.
,
That looks like design by necessity to me.

 

[Skull Pilot]

Anyone who has a belief system argues from the standpoint of their view,human nature.

Atheism is a belief system not based on evidence.

So is deism.

Wrong.

Design through necessity is evidence of a creator.

Or would you tackle this question;How would a naturalist explain necessities to survive coming about by a non-intelligent , non-thinking process ?

If you want to talk design then take into account the poor design of the human body.

We are easily injured as our heart and vital organs and genital are exposed and poorly protected.
The knee joint and lumbar region of the back are extremely weak etc etc etc.

And natural selection is just as good an explanation as design. It also accounts for the poor design elements as mutation tend to be a series of very minor changes that have an effect on survival; quick fixes if you will.

 

[Mr Natural]

So is deism.

Wrong.

Design through necessity is evidence of a creator.

Or would you tackle this question;How would a naturalist explain necessities to survive coming about by a non-intelligent , non-thinking process ?

If you want to talk design then take into account the poor design of the human body.

We are easily injured as our heart and vital organs and genital are exposed and poorly protected.
The knee joint and lumbar region of the back are extremely weak etc etc etc.

And natural selection is just as good an explanation as design. It also accounts for the poor design elements as mutation tend to be a series of very minor changes that have an effect on survival; quick fixes if you will.

Not only that, but of all the animals , we're the weakest physically.

If there were an intelligent designer up there making us in his own image, wouldn't he also made us physically superior ?

 

[Youwerecreated]

So is deism.

Wrong.

Design through necessity is evidence of a creator.

Or would you tackle this question;How would a naturalist explain necessities to survive coming about by a non-intelligent , non-thinking process ?

If you want to talk design then take into account the poor design of the human body.

We are easily injured as our heart and vital organs and genital are exposed and poorly protected.
The knee joint and lumbar region of the back are extremely weak etc etc etc.

And natural selection is just as good an explanation as design. It also accounts for the poor design elements as mutation tend to be a series of very minor changes that have an effect on survival; quick fixes if you will.

If design was involved with life it was a poor design

Surgeons have to saw through bone to get to the vitals.

The human body is a work of art but has suffered from over 6,000 years of poor genetics being passed from generation to generation.

Natural selection can't explain why we would have all the vital organs in place for life ?

Natural selection is what keeps the gene pool strong and helps keeping the group alive and removing the weaker genes.

If there was no natural selection we and all organisms would die off.

Natural selection is what would work against evolution because it would remove mutations that are not solidified in the gene pool.

How could a non-thinking and non-intelligent natural process think and create all the vital organs it would take for an organism to live ?

Micro-adaptations;

Fact #1 produce the same kind of plant or animal because of the DNA code barrier. Never will a cow produce a non-cow.

Micro-adaptations ;

Fact #2 result from the sorting or the loss of genetic information.

Fact # 3 scientist know of no way for nature to add appreciable amounts of new & beneficial genetic information to a gene pool.

Neo-darwinism is based on three false assumptions.

1. Mutations create new & beneficial genetic data.
2. Natural selection lets the mutant gene take over the population.
3. Needs long ages for this to happen millions of years ,given enough time they claim a bacteria cell overcame the law of abiogenesis and all mathematical possibility and came to life and then mutated its way to everything alive now,whew talk about faith. and they say it ended up the thing they call the ultimate mutation,you and I.

Here is a problem for you darwinist.

All observed mutations after millions of observations,mutations are caused by the sorting or loss of pre-existing genetic data. This is Gene Depletion. Gene depletion applies to Micro-adaptations and mutations,so they get weaker and weaker until they're removed by Natural Selection.

NATURAL SELECTION PREVENTS EVOLUTION FROM BEING POSSIBLE.

So you're being taught mutations + Natural Selection leads to Neo-darwinian Evolution.

But real science reveals based on millions of observations; DNA code barrier + Gene depletion + Natural Selection is what prevents Macro-evolution. Macro-evolution is an impossibility.

 

[Youwerecreated]

Wrong.

Design through necessity is evidence of a creator.

Or would you tackle this question;How would a naturalist explain necessities to survive coming about by a non-intelligent , non-thinking process ?

If you want to talk design then take into account the poor design of the human body.

We are easily injured as our heart and vital organs and genital are exposed and poorly protected.
The knee joint and lumbar region of the back are extremely weak etc etc etc.

And natural selection is just as good an explanation as design. It also accounts for the poor design elements as mutation tend to be a series of very minor changes that have an effect on survival; quick fixes if you will.

Not only that, but of all the animals , we're the weakest physically.

If there were an intelligent designer up there making us in his own image, wouldn't he also made us physically superior ?

Weaker how ? we can bring to extinction any organism alive even ourselves,who goes to look at animals in zoos gorillas and tigers or humans ? What we lack in land speed or vision or strength we make up for in reasonong skills.

The bible said all animals are in subjection to man.

Faulty reasoning.

 

[Mr Natural]

If you want to talk design then take into account the poor design of the human body.

We are easily injured as our heart and vital organs and genital are exposed and poorly protected.
The knee joint and lumbar region of the back are extremely weak etc etc etc.

And natural selection is just as good an explanation as design. It also accounts for the poor design elements as mutation tend to be a series of very minor changes that have an effect on survival; quick fixes if you will.

Not only that, but of all the animals , we're the weakest physically.

If there were an intelligent designer up there making us in his own image, wouldn't he also made us physically superior ?

Weaker how ? we can bring to extinction any organism alive even ourselves,who goes to look at animals in zoos gorillas and tigers or humans ? What we lack in land speed or vision or strength we make up for in reasonong skills.

The bible said all animals are in subjection to man.

Faulty reasoning.

Tell you what, pal, you go spend the night in the Savannah with nothing more than the clothes on your back and see how long you last and how superior you feel.

 

[Youwerecreated]

Not only that, but of all the animals , we're the weakest physically.

If there were an intelligent designer up there making us in his own image, wouldn't he also made us physically superior ?

Weaker how ? we can bring to extinction any organism alive even ourselves,who goes to look at animals in zoos gorillas and tigers or humans ? What we lack in land speed or vision or strength we make up for in reasonong skills.

The bible said all animals are in subjection to man.

Faulty reasoning.

Tell you what, pal, you go spend the night in the Savannah with nothing more than the clothes on your back and see how long you last and how superior you feel.

You know smart people will admit when they're wrong.

We have the means to control populations of organisms man is in control deal with it ,pal.

Besides a dumb person would do as you ask, i thonght man has become intelligent

 

[Mr Natural]

Weaker how ? we can bring to extinction any organism alive even ourselves,who goes to look at animals in zoos gorillas and tigers or humans ? What we lack in land speed or vision or strength we make up for in reasonong skills.

The bible said all animals are in subjection to man.

Faulty reasoning.

Tell you what, pal, you go spend the night in the Savannah with nothing more than the clothes on your back and see how long you last and how superior you feel.

You know smart people will admit when they're wrong.

We have the means to control populations of organisms man is in control deal with it ,pal.

Besides a dumb person would do as you ask, i thonght man has become intelligent

^

Human pride and arrogance on display.

 

[HUGGY]

Tell you what, pal, you go spend the night in the Savannah with nothing more than the clothes on your back and see how long you last and how superior you feel.

You know smart people will admit when they're wrong.

We have the means to control populations of organisms man is in control deal with it ,pal.

Besides a dumb person would do as you ask, i thonght man has become intelligent

^

Human pride and arrogance on display.

If God had controlled his organism when he stuck his dick in Mary he wouldn't have knocked her up.

Just sayin...

 

[Youwerecreated]

Tell you what, pal, you go spend the night in the Savannah with nothing more than the clothes on your back and see how long you last and how superior you feel.

You know smart people will admit when they're wrong.

We have the means to control populations of organisms man is in control deal with it ,pal.

Besides a dumb person would do as you ask, i thonght man has become intelligent

^

Human pride and arrogance on display.

Do you deny humans are superior regardless of strength or speed of animals ?

 

[SillyWabbit]

It all boils down to believable vs. unbelievable.

And it boils down to minding your own business and not worrying about what others do or don’t believe.

Yeah, minding one's own damn business, this is why people post their opinion in an online forum. Yep. That would be it alright.

 

[Youwerecreated]

You know smart people will admit when they're wrong.

We have the means to control populations of organisms man is in control deal with it ,pal.

Besides a dumb person would do as you ask, i thonght man has become intelligent

^

Human pride and arrogance on display.

If God had controlled his organism when he stuck his dick in Mary he wouldn't have knocked her up.

Just sayin...

Are you simply trying to bump your post count ?

 

[Youwerecreated]

It all boils down to believable vs. unbelievable.

And it boils down to minding your own business and not worrying about what others do or don’t believe.

Yeah, minding one's own damn business, this is why people post their opinion in an online forum. Yep. That would be it alright.

 

[SillyWabbit]

And it boils down to minding your own business and not worrying about what others do or don’t believe.

It's very hard to "mind one's own business" when religious types want to dilute science with myth and magic. They have places to worship..and should do their worshipping there.

Excellent, and gays have bedrooms to butt fuck in , they should keep their theory of gayativity there. Glad we agree.

Now it is known to all of us heathens. The Brain sayeth keep thy theory of gayativity in thy butt. Bravo, Sir/Madam, bravo.

(On a side note, how can we trust something that calls itself the Brain?)

 

[Gadawg73]

Why do the ID and creationist pushers have to go into open court and lie?
Why do they bring in so called evidence that a conservative Bush appointed Republican Federal Judge rules as rank fraud?

 

[SillyWabbit]

Why do most atheists defend Neo-darwinism when Neo-darwinism can't give a logical explanation supported by evidence as to the origins of life ?

Why do they reject the possibility of creation ?

Do you reject the possibility of the flying spaghetti monster theory?

I find it very difficult to find an argument against it. Surely if you believe that intelligent design is a possibility, wouldn't the flying spaghetti monster theory also be a possible theory?

Look, don't play games with TFSM. Alright? Things are bad enough without people calling down the wrath of Al Dente.

 

[Youwerecreated]

Why do the ID and creationist pushers have to go into open court and lie?
Why do they bring in so called evidence that a conservative Bush appointed Republican Federal Judge rules as rank fraud?

What does this have to do with this thread ?

Do you really want to cover frauds ? Because there are plenty that evolutionist purposely tried to mislead the public with.

 

[SillyWabbit]

I'll take Darwin and thousands of scientists over a talking snake.

The talking snake had nothing to do with the origins of life.

But there was a talking snake. Right?

Cause, forget Darwin, if I find that talking snake, I'm making me some money, bitches!