Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
On the contrary, I've probably read more of Lott's drivel than most posters here, given that 2aguy thinks the sun shines out of his posterior, despite him losing every academic position he ever held, and his "research" having been thoroughly debunked.Yeah, you wouldn’t want to read anything that disagrees with your fantasy story.
Really? Care to provide a link to back up your statement?Well, according to Suck My Dick.com, England is a Muslim terrorist state.
Correction, it's been available in Google for at least ten years and is widely known internationally. So it would be far more accurate for you to state that YOU have never heard of it. Here's a link, knock yourself out...His pissant web site, that NO ONE has ever heard of,
www.travelsafe-abroad.com
A year ago, true. Here's a link to what really goes on and what steps are being taken to improve things (spoiler alert, no guns involved):Well....the muslim mayor of London did say that the city is not safe for women or girls....
Rape, beatings, robberies.......just send those poor women to the NHS and get them patched up.....no need to stop the rapes, robberies or murders....
London streets not safe for women or girls, admits Sadiq Khan
‘It’s really important people like me in positions of power and influence take steps to address that’www.independent.co.uk
news.sky.com
Really? Care to provide a link to back up your statement?
Correction, it's been available in Google for at least ten years and is widely known internationally. So it would be far more accurate for you to state that YOU have never heard of it. Here's a link, knock yourself out...
Most Dangerous and Safest Countries Index
Click on the name of the country to see more information regarding its safety.
A year ago, true. Here's a link to what really goes on and what steps are being taken to improve things (spoiler alert, no guns involved):
The Great Debate: Are women safe on our streets? The key facts
The Great Debate: Are women safe on our streets? The key facts
o why don't you morons list the actual violent crimes against travelers? Oh my ALLAH (tip of the hat to the Caliphate that rules England) - while England has far more violent crimes per 100,000 visitors than the USA does, those Yanks let the PEASANTS have arms? What would Henry the VIII say? (Well, now days in Londonstan he'd have to say "Allahu Akbar")
If women in the UK wear a burka, then they are safe from being raped.
Submit to the ruling Caliphate.
Yup, you definitely voted for Trump, and are an excellent example of what Isaac Asimov was talking about.Like you did?
I was hesitant to make up a fake site like suckmydick.com, because it might turn out to be a gay porn site and you'd spend the next 20 hours at it - which it looks like is what happened..
This is a lie.
Women in Europe are not prohibited from protecting themselves.
Well, "discerning" is one word to describe a mind, so is "closed", "biased", "bigoted", "credulous", "rigid", "pig headed", "persuadable", etc etc.
All I have done is presented evidence that well regulated firearms laws in a country result in less gun violence in that that country. Nothing at all to do with any Post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy. I believe I have demonstrated the "necessary relationship" (whatever that means) by presenting sufficient examples where this is the case. Go as far out as Mongolia and the pattern holds true (30 gun deaths), or even a Right wing semi-dictatorship like Hungary (56 gun deaths). The result is consistent. The tighter the gun control, the less risk of being shot and/or killed by firearm. QED
A year ago, true. Here's a link to what really goes on and what steps are being taken to improve things (spoiler alert, no guns involved):
The Great Debate: Are women safe on our streets? The key facts
The Great Debate: Are women safe on our streets? The key facts
Sadly for you, none of those terms describe soeone who remains unswayed by your "proof".Well, "discerning" is one word to describe a mind, so is "closed", "biased", "bigoted", "credulous", "rigid", "pig headed", "persuadable", etc etc.
Oh. Well, OK.All I have done is presented evidence that well regulated firearms laws in a country result in less gun violence in that that country.
Correlation does not prove causation - so, no, you have not.I believe I have demonstrated the "necessary relationship" (whatever that means) by presenting sufficient examples where this is the case
How is it you do not understand that correlation does not prove causation?Still if you look at countries with strict gun controls, their gun death figures are dramatically lower, even allowing for differences in population to those of the USA.
How is it you do not understand that correlation does not prove causation?
Oh? What are they allowed to use. Liar.
Be specific.
You mouthbreathers really need to travel. You have this hilarious trailer park cartoon version of what Europe is like.
Ah yes, the usual cherry picked BS, coupled with your favourite masturbatory fantasy. Pity you didn't read the whole article, although it is a bit dated.LOL.....
More CCTV cameras? Now that is funny....
So when the woman is dragged into an alley by her attacker, they will capture it on video...so when the woman is at the NHS hospital getting treated for her beating and rape, the local Bobbies can come in and tell her, yep, they caught it all on video, but the attacker was hooded, dragged her into an alley with no CCTV coverage, so the likelihood is they will never catch the guy until he rapes enough British women that they eventually catch him by accident.....
AGain.......LOL....
True, nothing I say can convince closed minds, or anyone suffering from cognitive dissonance. I, and many millions like me feel safer living in a society with effective gun control. I can walk about unarmed and not have a constant fear that someone at my local pub, will not take offence at a chance remark and start shooting, or not like the way their hamburger was cooked and start shooting the staff, or having a family argument spiral out of control and start shooting each other, or being so frightened of being burgled, that I'd shoot my wife or daughter, returning late from work or a party. All of the aforementioned are fairly common occurrences in America.Sadly for you, none of those terms describe soeone who remains unswayed by your "proof".
Ah, so you want me to provide a confounder. Interesting. I suppose you are aware of perhaps the most well known and important example of a correlation being clear but causation being in doubt? Smoking and lung cancer in the 1950's, where it was found that the rate of lung cancer had increased dramatically in the proceeding decades. Nobody at the time disputed that there was a correlation between lung cancer and smoking, but to prove that one caused the other would be no mean feat. It took a study involving more than 40,000 doctors in the UK 6 years to show conclusively that smoking really does cause cancer!Correlation does not prove causation - so, no, you have not.
You rest on a post hoc fallacy.
Just like I said
Then you would be well aware of the French laws on self defence:Answer the question retard. My wife and I own a flat in Paris. I know Europe very well.
