The5thHorseman
Platinum Member
- Nov 22, 2022
- 12,136
- 6,575
- Thread starter
- #61
4%.I noticed you didn't subtract Obama's 2009 spending. Or TARP.
See?
Now, before you start running the Excuse Narrative, how about acknowledging the obvious?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
4%.I noticed you didn't subtract Obama's 2009 spending. Or TARP.
Toddster,390,000 cars X 30,000 = $11.7 billion. Meh.
Toddster,
Are you cheering for the death of American Auto and economic devastation through the Heartland?
Say something clever about unions.
4%.
See?
Now, before you start running the Excuse Narrative, how about acknowledging the obvious?
You forgot the economic multiplier effect.390,000 cars X 30,000 = $11.7 billion. Meh.
Where you're gonna be in 3 posts...What are you mumbling about now?
Toddster,Am I?
Toddster,
What are you bitching about?
Do you have any idea?
I'm the one doing your math, Toddy...No idea about your idiocy.
I'm the one doing your math, Toddy...
Bush was the one who put TARP into the budget. Bush wrote it, Bush signed it.Let me know when you subtract that Obama spending, and TARP, from fiscal 2009.
Bush was the one who put TARP into the budget. Bush wrote it, Bush signed it.
Bush owns it.
The Troubled Asset Relief Program, popularly known as TARP, was a program created under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008. It was approved by Congress and signed into law by President George W. Bush on October 3, 2008.
And he owns the increase in the budget. And the increase in the debt that year.I know. And then it was repaid. At a profit.
Bush owns the repayment and the profit.
Quit dropping your horse biscuits all over USMB, you are making a mess!As many of you may have noticed, this here Horseman has zero tolerance for Graduates of the Maria Bartiromo School of Duh!
Accordingly, one of her attentives has been taking a ferocious macing at the side of my steed (why he clings to my stirrup, I cannot fathom).
Specifically, we are examining the conceit that "Democrats spend like drunken sailors" and are therefore not only complicit in, but largely responsible, for our current level of Debt Held by The Public.
To do so, we will compares CAGRs (Compound Annual Growth Rates) of spending and revenue collection for each POTUS going back to 1979.
The numbers are as follows (in billions)
At t=0, Sept 30, 1981
Spending - 678.2 Revenue - 599.3
Reagan (end of term)
Spending - 1143
Revenue - 991
Annual Growth Rates
6.7%/6/4%
Bush
Spending - 1409
Revenue -1154
5.36/3.88
Clinton
Spending - 1862
Revenue - 1991
3.5/7.05
Bush II
Spending - 3517
Revenue - 2105
8.3/0.7
Obama
Spending - 3981
Revenues - 3316
1.56/5.8
Trump
Spending - 4.7*
Revenues - 3.5*
5.7/1.8
* to avoid the bitter tears and recriminations, I have used Grifty's last WH Budget request, and extrapolated the deficit based on trend. Subtracting this from Outlays should be equal to Revenues.
Will this require further elaboration?
And he owns the increase in the budget. And the increase in the debt that year.
It's no different than buying a house, and going into debt. And then selling the house at a profit ten years later. The eventual profit doesn't change the debt you put yourself in when you bought it.
The government and the US economy are TWO SEPARATE THINGS!!!If it is all Congress, why does Grifty keep yakking about his economy?
You're a fucking idiotThe government and the US economy are TWO SEPARATE THINGS!!!
Got anything to say about the facts, Mikey?Quit dropping your horse biscuits all over USMB, you are making a mess!
Why?Let me know when you subtract that Obama spending, and TARP, from fiscal 2009.
Why?
YOU do that math for us, Toddy...
You bragged about finding 4th and 8th roots....turns out ypu struggle with the Ordinal Property...