Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
and while not the sole cause, it was a contributing factor that the points that were damaged by the plane crash weakend the structural supports and put extra loads onto the existing supportsMine is the same as the conclusion of the American Society of Civil Engineers, of which I have been a member for almost 30 years. The unabated fires brought the buildings down: The floor trusses softened and drooped, the columns then lost lateral support and buckled at their weakest points, which were bolted connections in 20' lengths. When one 40' section gave way the building above that level dropped, "free fall", to the sections below, which were not designed to handle those dynamic loads. Therefore the failure progressed to the entire building.
I would like to see a correlation between these kooks and what percentage are Democrats. I'm certain that it would be a high number; close to 100%.and while not the sole cause, it was a contributing factor that the points that were damaged by the plane crash weakend the structural supports and put extra loads onto the existing supports
it was a combination effect
thats why these troofer morons have to ignore the science
I would like to see a correlation between these kooks and what percentage are Democrats. I'm certain that it would be a high number; close to 100%.
What the fuck are you talking about? The KKK is the terrorist wing of the Democrat Party, created when they lost the Civil War, and carried in to the present by guys like Robert "Sheets" Byrd, Democrat West Virginia.That makes no point at all. It's the same as that 100% of the KKK is republican.
most i have dealt with are libertarian to total anachistsI would like to see a correlation between these kooks and what percentage are Democrats. I'm certain that it would be a high number; close to 100%.
What the fuck are you talking about? The KKK is the terrorist wing of the Democrat Party, created when they lost the Civil War, and carried in to the present by guys like Robert "Sheets" Byrd, Democrat West Virginia.
fixedThat makes no point at all. It's the same as SAYING that 100% of the KKK is republican.
see my fixWhat the fuck are you talking about? The KKK is the terrorist wing of the Democrat Party, created when they lost the Civil War, and carried in to the present by guys like Robert "Sheets" Byrd, Democrat West Virginia.
About half of Libtardians are Democrats who figured out economics, but are still clinging to liberal social issues. Anarchists tend to be children of far-left Liberals who want to shock their parents.most i have dealt with are libertarian to total anachists
few are dems but thats mostly because they want to blame everything on Bush
they are the minority
actually, thats not true eitherThe modern versions of things are never the same as when they started. The oiginal republicans and democrats use to work together more, but now they just keep attacking each other for instance. Most KKK members today are republican ... most likely. Not like they actually tell anyone who they are all the time.
actually, thats not true either
Wow you're full of fucked-up, baseless theories. So Republicans shed blood to stop racist Democrat policies, but that's not contentious compared with modern times, when the Republicans and Democrats each adopted each others positions to become really hateful of each other.The modern versions of things are never the same as when they started. The oiginal republicans and democrats use to work together more, but now they just keep attacking each other for instance. Most KKK members today are republican ... most likely. Not like they actually tell anyone who they are all the time.
what part of what she said isn't true? seems about right to me.
what he saidThat's because you're as shit-fer-brains dumb as she is.
Mine is the same as the conclusion of the American Society of Civil Engineers, of which I have been a member for almost 30 years. The unabated fires brought the buildings down: The floor trusses softened and drooped, the columns then lost lateral support and buckled at their weakest points, which were bolted connections in 20' lengths. When one 40' section gave way the building above that level dropped, "free fall", to the sections below, which were not designed to handle those dynamic loads. Therefore the failure progressed to the entire building.
sigh, the tower fell right into WTC 7so you read their conclusion.. did you read how they arrived at it ...that was fema's findings..but it was agenda driven science full of contradictions and allowances for along series of highly improbable phenomenon all occurring one after the other..it was a completely flawed study and was based mainly on fire ..which did nothing to explain the collapse of building 7 not jet fuel yet it falls in the same controlled manner the only 3 buildings to fall due to fire ever
big deal it was a massive building and had only small fires many buildings have suffered fire greater stress and not collapsed..even nist has not concluded on wtc 7..no sorry does not even come close to a explanation ..it could if really stretched explain some sort of even tipping or partial collapse but not in the manner it occurred
YouTube - wtc 7 collapse 7 SECS
now you are back to talking bullshit againbig deal it was a massive building and had only small fires many buildings have suffered fire greater stress and not collapsed..even nist has not concluded on wtc 7..no sorry does not even come close to a explanation ..it could if really stretched explain some sort of even tipping or partial collapse but not in the manner it occurred
YouTube - wtc 7 collapse 7 SECS
now you are back to talking bullshit again
you totally ignore the facts and bring up some BS video and make an unfounded claim
a 60k gallon tank of diesel fuel ruptured from the damage done by the colapse of the tower into WTC7, it also took out 2/3rds of the south face of the building
damaged the support structures as well
thus putting more stress on the remaining supports, the fire burned unabated for HOURS
it finally just colapsed because the support structures lost their ability to stand
now you are back to talking bullshit again
you totally ignore the facts and bring up some BS video and make an unfounded claim
a 60k gallon tank of diesel fuel ruptured from the damage done by the colapse of the tower into WTC7, it also took out 2/3rds of the south face of the building
damaged the support structures as well
thus putting more stress on the remaining supports, the fire burned unabated for HOURS
it finally just colapsed because the support structures lost their ability to stand
