MarathonMike
Diamond Member
False equivalence fallacy #21943. Fail. Next.Different reactions to similar events, I guess.
![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
False equivalence fallacy #21943. Fail. Next.Different reactions to similar events, I guess.
![]()
I agree. Why the poster even suggested it is beyond me.Only the simplistic, binary mind of a winger would come up with such a question. No.
He’s postNothing wrong with binary thinking.
The separator is, you're either pro-Constitutional or post-Constitutional.
Dear USMB reader's already know where you stand.