geauxtohell
Choose your weapon.
You're the one making things up. Iraq was in material breach of many resolutions, many of them threatening military action. We simply acted on that when the UN proved too gutless to enforce their own resolutions. That and the fact Kofi Annan was sucking Saddam's dick for money.
LMAO.
The UN did not support us going into Iraq in any way. We did not have a "mandate" in any shape or form.
And, the last time I checked, it wasn't the job of the United States to unilaterally enforce UN resolutions. That's what the security council is for.
Are you always this dishonest?
Are you always this ignorant?
Here's part of Resolution 1441:
Looks like authorization to me. The U.S ambassador to the UN at the time thought so too.Recalling that its resolution 678 (1990) authorized Member States to use all necessary means to uphold and implement its resolution 660 (1990) of 2 August 1990 and all relevant resolutions subsequent to Resolution 660 (1990) and to restore international peace and security in the area,
Then why didn't the UN enforce it?
I don't know if you are ignorant or deliberately obtuse, but the United States is not in the business of enforcing UN mandates.